Paul Krugman: GOP, Europe is awesome!
Nobel laureate Paul Krugman asserts that the anxiety fueling MAGA is not based on reality, but rather on dystopian visions detached from actual experiences. To support his claim, he highlights Kristi Noem, the Republican governor of South Dakota, who he describes as a staunch MAGA supporter. Krugman challenges the notion that Europe is a scene of chaos caused by waves of immigrants, arguing that it is actually an ideal.
However, Krugman’s audacity is apparent when considering his past predictions. He once warned that Mitt Romney would be worse than Herbert Hoover and predicted a global recession under Donald Trump with no end in sight. It is ironic that he now criticizes partisan hyperbole. Surprisingly, Krugman’s column does not criticize Noem for misrepresenting Biden’s intentions, but rather praises Europe as a model society.
Krugman claims to have spent time exploring various European cities last year. However, it is doubtful that he ventured into the crime-ridden banlieues of Paris, where unassimilated Muslim immigrants reside, or witnessed the pro-Hamas marches in London. Most Europeans do not live in picturesque city centers that cater to American tourists. Krugman once fantasized about forcing Euro-skeptical Americans to take walking tours of Stockholm, but the high cost of living in European cities makes this an unrealistic proposition.
In Sweden, the average home size is 893 square feet, compared to 1,944 square feet in the United States. The median home price per square foot is $214 in the US, while Stockholm’s price is even higher. Krugman’s real concern seems to be the freedom enjoyed by Americans to live in spacious homes with large yards, away from crowded cities.
Noem’s comments about America becoming like Europe were specifically about immigration. Sweden, like many other European nations, has faced significant challenges due to its open-door policy towards Middle Eastern refugees. Riots, gang violence, and sexual crimes have surged, with nearly half of sexual offenders in Swedish jails being foreign-born. The head of Sweden’s largest party even admitted to the failure of immigrant assimilation, leading to the creation of “parallel societies.” Krugman should consider visiting segregated cities like Malmo, where Jews live in fear, before idealizing Europe.
Proponents of Europe often cherry-pick its positive aspects and compare them to the worst aspects of the United States. Krugman, for example, highlights Europe’s longer life expectancy but fails to acknowledge that health outcomes are influenced by cultural choices and not just the socialist systems he favors. When thinking about Europe, one cannot ignore the rampant antisemitism, ongoing conflicts, declining Christianity, and the rise of Islamic radicalism. Additionally, Europe’s overregulated economy and difficulty in starting new businesses are significant drawbacks.
While the eurozone’s growth was only 0.5 percent last year, the United States experienced a growth rate of 2.5 percent, despite the challenges posed by the pandemic. Krugman’s attempt to portray Europe as superior while simultaneously acknowledging the strength of the US economy is contradictory. Dismissing those who disagree with him as detached from reality only further undermines his credibility.
Given Krugman’s track record of being consistently wrong about various topics, it is reasonable to approach his perspective on grocery shopping with skepticism. His recent claim that the “war on inflation” is over is misleading, as he conveniently excludes essential items like food, shelter, energy, and used cars from his analysis. It is clear that Krugman’s cultural, ideological, and political biases heavily influence his view of reality, making his columns a prime example of distorted perception.
rnrn
What are some economic factors in Europe that Krugman conveniently ignores when discussing its model?
Veral neighborhoods in France and England before painting such a rosy picture of Europe.
Furthermore, Krugman conveniently ignores the economic aspects of the European model that he praises. High taxes, excessive regulations, and a bloated welfare state have hindered economic growth and stifled innovation in Europe. This is in stark contrast to the United States, where lower taxes and a more business-friendly environment have allowed for unparalleled economic success.
While it is true that Europe has its merits, such as its rich cultural heritage and commitment to social welfare, it is important to acknowledge its shortcomings as well. The issue with Krugman’s argument is not that Europe is inherently bad, but rather that it should not be romanticized and used as a basis for criticizing the MAGA movement.
Noem’s concerns about America becoming like Europe are valid and should be taken seriously. As a leader, she understands the importance of maintaining and preserving the American way of life, which is rooted in individual liberties, limited government, and economic prosperity. By advocating for an immigration policy that prioritizes national security and assimilation, Noem is simply protecting these core values.
In conclusion, Krugman’s attempt to dismiss the anxiety fueling the MAGA movement as detached from reality is misguided. It is essential to consider both the positives and negatives of Europe’s model before drawing any conclusions. Noem’s warnings about the potential consequences of adopting a European approach to immigration should not be disregarded. Rather than blindly idolizing Europe, we should focus on what makes America unique and strive to preserve the principles that have made it the greatest nation in the world.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...