Syrian and Iraqi officials furious over US strikes
Officials Condemn US Strike on Iran-Backed Militias
Officials in Syria and Iraq have strongly criticized the United States for its recent overnight strike on several Iran-backed militias. They argue that these attacks will only worsen the already unstable situation in both countries.
Violation of Iraqi Sovereignty
“These strikes constitute a violation of Iraqi sovereignty and undermine the efforts of the Iraqi government,” stated Brig. Gen. Yahya Rasool, a spokesperson for Iraq’s military, on Friday.
The US approved the strike on seven sites, targeting three in Iraq and four in Syria. More than 125 precision munitions were used in these strikes, which were carried out in retaliation for a drone attack that killed three American soldiers at a small US military post in northeast Jordan last weekend. The United States has accused the Islamic Resistance in Iraq, an umbrella group of Iran-backed militias, of being responsible for the attack.
Strategic Targets Hit
“The facilities that were struck included command and control operations, intelligence centers, rockets and missiles, unmanned aerial vehicle storages, and logistics and munition supply chain facilities of militia groups and their IRGC sponsors who facilitated attacks against US and Coalition forces,” stated CENTCOM in a press release.
The retaliatory attack resulted in at least 16 deaths and 25 injuries, according to the Iraqi government. The Biden administration has warned that this will not be the last of such attacks.
Despite the response, some conservatives have criticized the Biden administration for waiting too long to take action following the Sunday strike that claimed the lives of US soldiers.
Delayed Response
“The tragic deaths of three US troops in Jordan, perpetrated by Iran-backed militias, demanded a clear and forceful response,” expressed House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA). “Unfortunately, the administration waited for a week and telegraphed to the world, including Iran, the nature of our response.”
However, defense officials have defended the decision, deeming the strikes a success.
Successful Strikes
“We hit exactly what we meant to hit,” affirmed Lt. Gen. Douglas Sims, director of operations for the Joint Chiefs of Staff. “We confidently struck targets that will impact their ability to conduct future strikes against Americans.”
For more information, click here to visit The Washington Examiner.
What is the key concern raised by officials in regards to the US strikes on Iran-backed militias?
Out in response to recent attacks on US and coalition personnel in Iraq. The strikes were aimed at deterring future attacks from Iran-backed militias and to protect the lives of American soldiers and their allies.
However, officials in the region argue that these strikes will only exacerbate the already fragile situation in Syria and Iraq. The violation of Iraqi sovereignty is one of the key concerns raised by these officials.
Brig. Gen. Yahya Rasool emphasized that the strikes undermine the efforts of the Iraqi government. Iraq has been striving to regain stability and sovereignty after years of conflict and intervention. The unilateral action taken by the US is seen as a setback to Iraq’s efforts to establish control over its own territory and to maintain the fragile peace.
Critics argue that these strikes may lead to a cycle of retaliation and escalation. The strike on Iran-backed militias will undoubtedly provoke a response from these groups, leading to further violence and instability in the region. This can potentially lead to a wider conflict involving other regional actors.
Moreover, the strikes come at a time when both Syria and Iraq are grappling with numerous challenges, including the fight against ISIS, the ongoing civil war in Syria, and the rebuilding efforts in both countries. The focus should be on addressing these pressing issues rather than engaging in military actions that risk exacerbating the existing problems.
Furthermore, the strikes have raised concerns about the lack of international law and consensus in such actions. The US has carried out these strikes unilaterally, without seeking the approval of the United Nations or any other international body. This undermines the principles of sovereignty, non-interference, and respect for international law.
It is imperative for all parties involved to exercise restraint and seek diplomatic solutions to the ongoing tensions. Dialogue and negotiations should be prioritized to ensure stability and avoid further destabilization in the region.
The international community, including regional powers and the UN, should play a role in de-escalating the situation and facilitating a peaceful resolution. Rather than resorting to military actions, diplomatic efforts and engagement should be encouraged to address the root causes of the conflicts and bring about lasting stability and peace.
In conclusion, the recent US strikes on Iran-backed militias have drawn strong criticism from officials in Syria and Iraq. The violation of Iraqi sovereignty and the potential for escalation are major concerns raised by these officials. It is crucial for all parties to prioritize diplomatic solutions and engage in dialogue to address the underlying issues and ensure lasting stability in the region.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...