RFK Jr. criticizes Senate border bill, questions Ukraine funds
Independent Presidential Candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Opposes Senate Bill Coupling Border Security Reforms with Foreign Aid
Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. made a bold announcement on Monday, expressing his opposition to a bipartisan Senate bill that combines border security reforms with funds for Ukraine, Israel, and other foreign causes.
In a powerful post on X, Kennedy shared a photo of President Joe Biden with his hand on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s shoulder, highlighting his specific concern with the bill’s $60 billion in wartime aid to Ukraine, which comes nearly two years after Russia’s invasion. Kennedy stated, “The new Senate Bill is a disaster. We’ve already spent $113 billion on this proxy war in Ukraine. Requesting an additional $60 billion when we have so many problems at home including inflation and the border crisis is reckless. No more money for Ukraine until we have a secure border, a booming economy, and pay off some of our $34 trillion of debt.”
The new Senate Bill is a disaster. We’ve already spent $113B on this proxy war in Ukraine.
Requesting an additional $60B when we have so many problems at home including inflation and the border crisis is reckless.
No more money for Ukraine until we have a… pic.twitter.com/HiVauGjslu
— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) February 5, 2024
In another impactful post, Kennedy criticized the Senate bill’s allocation of $60 billion in military “aid” to Ukraine, stating that the aid actually benefits US defense contractors and corrupt Ukrainian officials. He questioned whether there could be a better use for such a substantial amount of money.
Recent polls indicate that Kennedy is gaining double-digit support in a potential match-up against Biden and former President Donald Trump. This comes as voters express their lack of enthusiasm for a 2020 rematch.
During a discussion on CNN about ballot access, Kennedy expressed his openness to joining forces with the Libertarian Party. In response to one of Kennedy’s posts on X, the party voiced opposition not only to Ukraine aid but also to support for Israel.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
The Libertarian Party’s account responded, stating, “Ukraine is not the only foreign country funded by this bill… No more money for Ukraine OR ISRAEL. Sending the hard-earned money stolen from Americans abroad when we have so many problems at home is reckless. No. More. Foreign. Aid. Period.”
While Trump discouraged GOP lawmakers from supporting the Senate bill, Nikki Haley, his Republican rival, expressed mixed feelings about the legislation. Haley liked some of the asylum changes but disliked other aspects, suggesting that Congress should stay in Washington and work towards a viable compromise.
Biden, whose administration played a role in devising the contents of the compromise bill, urged lawmakers to pass it, emphasizing the bill’s border reforms, support for Ukraine and Israel, and humanitarian assistance for the Palestinian people.
“We’ve reached an agreement on a bipartisan deal that includes the toughest and fairest set of border reforms in decades. And it includes support for Ukraine and Israel and provides humanitarian assistance for the Palestinian people,” Biden said in a post on X. “I urge Congress to pass this bill immediately.”
How do critics of Kennedy’s position argue that foreign aid contributes to global security and economic benefits for the United States?
The Senate bill, Kennedy’s opposition reflects a growing concern among Americans about the prioritization of foreign aid over domestic issues such as border security and the economy.
Kennedy’s stance on the Senate bill aligns with his overall message of putting America first. He argues that with the ongoing border crisis, rising inflation, and a staggering national debt, it is irresponsible to allocate such a significant amount of money to foreign causes. Instead, he believes that the focus should be on securing the border, revitalizing the economy, and addressing the country’s financial obligations.
Critics of Kennedy’s position argue that foreign aid is essential for maintaining global security and stability. They emphasize the importance of supporting countries like Ukraine and Israel, especially in the face of Russian aggression and regional conflicts. They also highlight the potential economic benefits of foreign aid, such as creating jobs for American defense contractors.
However, Kennedy’s opposition resonates with those who prioritize addressing domestic issues before extending a helping hand to other nations. They argue that America must prioritize its own citizens and address the pressing issues at home before allocating significant resources to foreign causes.
Kennedy’s stance on the Senate bill highlights his commitment to fiscal responsibility and his belief in the importance of prioritizing American interests. As an independent candidate, he offers an alternative perspective to the bipartisan politics that have governed Washington for decades. His opposition to the Senate bill demonstrates his willingness to challenge the status quo and advocate for policies that align with his vision for the country.
As the 2024 presidential race intensifies, Kennedy’s opposition to the Senate bill serves as another point of differentiation between him and the established political landscape. While it remains to be seen how his stance will resonate with voters, his willingness to take a stand on this issue shows his commitment to sticking to his principles and putting America’s needs first.
In a political climate dominated by partisan bickering and contentious debates, Kennedy’s opposition to the Senate bill offers a fresh perspective. Whether or not his opposition will sway public opinion remains to be seen, but it is clear that his stance on this issue distinguishes him from the traditional party lines. As the 2024 presidential race unfolds, it will be interesting to see how Kennedy’s opposition to the Senate bill shapes the national conversation and influences voter sentiment.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...