Washington Examiner

Iraqi military accuses US airstrike of being a clear assassination, fueling instability

The United States Military Conducts Airstrike in Baghdad, Sparking Controversy

The United States military executed a ‍bold and controversial airstrike⁤ in Baghdad on Thursday, described by an Iraqi military spokesman as a “blatant assassination” that further fuels instability in the ‍region.

At 9:30​ p.m. local time, U.S. Central Command carried out the strike, eliminating a high-ranking‌ commander from Kata’ib Hezbollah. While the ‍commander’s identity remains undisclosed, the U.S. military ⁢stated that he was responsible for planning and participating in numerous attacks against U.S. forces in Syria, Iraq, and Jordan.

Outrage and Concern Over U.S. Actions

Major General Special Forces Yehia Rasool, the ‍spokesman for the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, expressed⁤ outrage over the U.S. strike,⁤ accusing American forces of disregarding civilian lives and international laws. He emphasized that this act not ‍only jeopardizes civil peace but also violates Iraqi sovereignty and endangers the safety of its citizens. Rasool further ‍criticized the coalition ‍for deviating from its original reasons and objectives for being present in Iraqi territory.

“By ⁢this act, the American forces jeopardize civil peace, violate Iraqi sovereignty, and disregard the safety and lives ‍of our citizens. Even ​more concerning is that the coalition ‌consistently deviates from the reasons ⁣and objectives for its presence on our territory.”

The U.S. military maintains a ‍presence in​ Iraq and Syria to ensure the ‌lasting defeat of the Islamic State. However, ongoing discussions between the Pentagon and ⁤their Iraqi counterparts regarding the⁤ future of their⁢ military partnership have been overshadowed by the recent surge in aggression throughout the Middle East.

Rasool emphasized ⁢the urgent need for the Iraqi government to terminate its‌ coalition with the United States, which he ⁣believes has become a ‌destabilizing factor. ⁤He expressed concern that Iraq may‍ become entangled in a cycle of conflict‌ and emphasized the ‍constitutional duty of the armed forces to ​safeguard the security of its people and land.

Escalating Attacks on U.S.​ Forces

Militias in Iraq and Syria‍ have launched‌ over 165 strikes and ‍attacks against U.S. forces since mid-October, with only one attack occurring ​in Jordan. The attack targeted Tower 22, a small U.S. military outpost near the Syrian and Iraqi borders, resulting in the deaths of three U.S. service members and ‍over 40 others‍ wounded.

In response ​to these attacks, the U.S. declared a multi-phased retaliation plan. The initial phase involved a significant number of strikes in both Iraq and‌ Syria, targeting more than ‌85 locations with over 125 precision‌ munitions.

Despite these retaliatory measures, the militias persist in their⁤ attacks against U.S. forces, ​demonstrating their determination and defiance.

It is clear that tensions in the region continue‍ to escalate,⁤ raising concerns about the future‍ stability and security ‍of Iraq and its ‍relationship with the United States.

What justifications does the ⁤U.S. military offer ‍for⁢ conducting the airstrike in Iraq?

Iraq,⁤ which were primarily focused on combating terrorism and providing security support.

Rasool’s sentiments were echoed by political and ‍military leaders‌ across Iraq, with⁣ many condemning the U.S. ⁤airstrike as an act ⁢of aggression ‌that undermines the country’s sovereignty and hampers its efforts towards stability. The incident has reignited anti-American sentiment ⁣among the Iraqi population, who view this ‍as another example of ‌the U.S. ⁢military’s disregard for Iraqi ⁤lives and interests.

Justification for ⁣the Airstrike

On the other hand, the U.S. military defends its actions as a necessary‍ measure to protect its personnel and interests in the region. In a statement, the⁣ U.S. Central Command ‌reiterated that⁤ the targeted⁢ commander and⁣ the Kata’ib‍ Hezbollah militia were responsible for⁤ several attacks ⁣against American forces and their allies. They cited the recent rocket attacks on an Iraqi military base that killed an American contractor and injured ‍several U.S. service members as a direct provocation that‌ warranted a‌ response.

The United States ‌maintains that it has⁣ the right to defend itself and its personnel from‍ threats and has repeatedly warned​ Iran-backed ⁢militias against targeting American interests⁣ in​ the region. This ‌airstrike is seen as⁣ a message ‍to those militias, indicating that the U.S. military will swiftly respond ⁣to any attack on its forces or its ⁤allies.

The Broader Implications

This airstrike comes at a ⁢time of​ increased⁣ tension between the United States and Iran, and it further escalates the already volatile situation​ in the region. The U.S. has blamed Iran for backing and supporting Kata’ib Hezbollah and other militia groups, accusing them of⁢ destabilizing Iraq and threatening American interests.

Experts and⁤ analysts worry that this latest U.S. action could lead‌ to a dangerous​ cycle of reprisals and⁢ retaliation. The risk of further attacks and counterattacks ‌puts the lives​ of both American and Iraqi citizens​ at risk, and raises concerns about a ‌potential escalation of violence in‍ the already⁣ war-torn region.

International Reactions

The international community has ⁢responded to this airstrike with a mix of caution and⁤ criticism. Several⁤ countries, including Russia and China, have called for restraint and de-escalation, urging all parties⁤ to ‌prioritize diplomatic solutions.⁤ The United Nations⁢ has expressed concern over the impact of this strike⁣ on regional stability and reiterated ​the importance ⁤of respecting international law.

There is no ⁢doubt that this U.S. airstrike in Baghdad has‌ sparked controversy and revived the debate about the ​U.S. military’s⁢ presence and actions in the region. As tensions continue to simmer, it remains to be‌ seen how this incident ⁢will shape the future of U.S.-Iraq relations‍ and the broader​ geopolitical landscape in the Middle East.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker