The free beacon

Jamaal Bowman justifies inclusion of controversial figures on school ‘Wall of Honor

Cynthia McKinney, Assata Shakur ‘have complicated biographies,’ Bowman spokeswoman says

Rep. Jamaal Bowman (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

New York Democratic congressman Jamaal Bowman is defending his ⁣decision to glorify a prominent anti-Semite‍ and two cop killers on a “Wall of ‌Honor” at the middle ⁤school he⁤ led, with his campaign saying those figures ⁤”have complicated biographies” and should still be taught to children.

As principal ⁢of Cornerstone Academy for Social Action, Bowman in 2014 curated a “Wall of ⁢Honor” that featured former congresswoman Cynthia McKinney (D., Ga.), Assata Shakur,‍ and Mutulu ​Shakur—all of⁣ whom Bowman said “played a‌ major role in⁣ moving our ⁢society … toward⁢ a world of ​freedom, justice, and equality,” according to ‍a HuffPost report. Years before Bowman established the wall, in 2009, McKinney attended a Holocaust⁢ denial gathering in London,‍ where she praised anti-Semitic leaders ⁢and writers.​ Assata Shakur was convicted for the first-degree murder of a New Jersey state trooper in 1973, while Mutulu Shakur ‌led a group of armed robbers who killed a ⁢guard and two New York police officers in 1981.

Now, Bowman says his inclusion of those figures⁢ on his “Wall of Honor” is nothing to criticize, with his campaign even contending that the lives of ‌McKinney,​ Assata Shakur, and Mutulu Shakur should be taught to American schoolchildren.

“It ⁤is correct that many leaders in the Black liberation movement ‍… have complicated biographies,” Bowman spokeswoman‍ Sarah Iddrissu told Huffpost. “It‌ is completely baseless, and a rhetorical tool of the far-right, to insinuate educating students on‍ major figures of Black American history is serving to promote hateful or divisive rhetoric or actions.”

“Suppressing the education of ‍Black history only serves to ​enable violence​ against Black people,” she concluded.

The‍ ordeal marks yet⁤ another controversy for Bowman, who is facing a difficult primary campaign against Westchester County executive George ‍Latimer.

Bowman in January‍ attended ⁣a New ⁢York City panel discussion titled, “Palestine Oct. 7th and After.” Bowman ⁤took the mic at⁢ the panel to gushingly ⁢introduce Norman ⁤Finkelstein, an anti-Israel author who ⁢celebrated Hamas’s massacre as ​a “heroic resistance” that “warm[ed] every fiber” of his soul. Bowman said he ‌was “starstruck” by⁢ Finkelstein⁢ and other anti-Israel panelists “because I watch them ⁣all the time on YouTube.” After the comment prompted criticism, Bowman said he was “unaware” of Finkelstein’s ​comments.

Just weeks later, the Daily Beast unearthed a poem Bowman published ‍to his ‍personal blog, which suggested the‍ Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks⁣ were a false flag operation used by the U.S. ‌government‍ to wage war in the Middle East. “Allegedly/Two other planes/The Pentagon/Pennsylvania/Hijacked by terrorist/Minimal damage done/Minimal debris found/Hmmm…” Bowman wrote in one stanza. He also served as principal of Cornerstone Academy at the time.

The poem ​may explain‌ Bowman’s affinity for McKinney, ‍who in 2002 ⁣suggested then-president George W. Bush knew about ⁢the Sept. 11‍ attacks in advance and allowed ‌them to happen so his father could make money. McKinney went on to⁤ post a photo to social media that blamed Jews for⁢ the attacks.‌ Her father similarly blamed Jews when McKinney lost her congressional seat in 2002.

“Jews have bought everybody. Jews. J-E-W-S,” ‍he⁤ said.

Bowman, who did⁢ not return a request for comment, has lagged behind Latimer in fundraising. As of Dec. 31,‌ he holds just $631,000 on hand, compared with Latimer’s $1.3 million.

What are the arguments for and against the ⁣inclusion of individuals with controversial backgrounds on a⁢ “Wall of Honor” in a middle school?

In recent news, New York Democratic congressman ⁢Jamaal Bowman has come under scrutiny for his decision to honor individuals with controversial backgrounds on a “Wall ⁢of Honor” at the middle school where he once served as principal. The figures in question are⁢ former congresswoman Cynthia ​McKinney,​ Assata ⁣Shakur, and Mutulu Shakur. While Bowman’s campaign defends his choice, stating⁤ that ​these individuals have “complicated biographies” and should be taught to ‌children,‍ many have raised concerns about the‌ inclusion of an anti-Semite and two ‍cop killers in a place of recognition and inspiration for young minds.

As the principal of ​Cornerstone Academy for Social‌ Action, Bowman curated‍ the “Wall of Honor” in 2014. ‍According to​ reports, he attributed a major role to McKinney, Assata ‌Shakur, and Mutulu Shakur in moving society towards freedom, justice, and ⁤equality.‌ However, their actions and associations raise serious questions about their suitability for ⁣such recognition.⁣ Before the establishment of the wall, McKinney⁣ attended a Holocaust denial gathering in London in 2009, where she praised⁤ anti-Semitic leaders and writers. Assata Shakur was convicted of the ⁢first-degree murder of a New Jersey state trooper in 1973, while Mutulu Shakur⁤ led a group of‍ armed ‍robbers ⁤responsible ‍for the‍ deaths of a guard and two police⁢ officers in 1981.

Bowman’s campaign maintains that the inclusion of these figures on the “Wall of Honor” should ⁣not be criticized​ and that their lives should be ‍taught to American schoolchildren. Sarah Iddrissu, Bowman’s spokeswoman, argues that many leaders in the Black liberation movement have complicated biographies and insinuating ⁤that educating students about these figures promotes hateful or divisive rhetoric ‍is​ baseless. She emphasizes that suppressing the education of Black history only perpetuates ​violence against Black ‍people.

While⁣ it is important to acknowledge the complexities and challenges faced by historical figures, it is equally crucial to critically examine their actions and ideologies. The decision to honor individuals with controversial backgrounds raises concerns⁤ about the values and messages being conveyed to young, impressionable minds. It is crucial to foster an inclusive and respectful learning environment⁣ that promotes empathy, understanding, and tolerance. As such,​ the inclusion of individuals ⁢with anti-Semitic views and those⁣ convicted of heinous crimes on a “Wall of Honor” calls into question the judgment and values underlying such decisions.

This controversy adds ‌to the challenges faced by Congressman Bowman, who is ⁣already engaged in a difficult primary campaign against Westchester County executive George Latimer. The inclusion of individuals with controversial backgrounds on a “Wall of Honor” ⁤raises valid concerns‍ about the choices and messages communicated⁤ to students.⁤ Moving forward, it is essential to engage in constructive dialogue about the appropriate representation of historical figures and to ensure that the education of Black history remains unbiased,‍ accurate, and fosters respect for all individuals.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker