White House angered by report on Biden’s ‘weak recollection
President Biden’s White House Counsel Criticizes Special Counsel’s Report on Memory Issues
The White House counsel for President Joe Biden expressed strong disagreement with the special counsel’s report on Biden’s handling of classified material, particularly the sections that highlighted his memory problems. Richard Sauber, Special Counsel to the President, and Bob Bauer, Biden’s personal counsel, wrote a letter to Special Counsel Robert Hur, stating their belief that the report’s treatment of Biden’s memory was inaccurate and inappropriate.
The report acknowledged that Biden had retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency, but concluded that no criminal charges were warranted. However, the report’s assessment of Biden’s mental fitness could have significant implications for his re-election campaign, as a majority of American voters have concerns about his age and health.
Memory Issues Raise Concerns
“Mr. Biden’s memory was significantly limited, both during his recorded interviews with the ghostwriter in 2017, and in his interview with our office in 2023,” stated the special counsel report. ”We have also considered that, at trial, Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.”
Prosecutors acknowledged that jurors would find it challenging to convict Biden, given his age and memory issues. Biden’s lawyers argued that the report used prejudicial language to describe a common occurrence among witnesses: a lack of recall of past events. They claimed that such remarks had no place in a Department of Justice report and that there was ample evidence of Biden performing well during questioning.
Biden’s lawyers attributed his memory issues to the October 7 terrorist attack in Israel, which occurred the day before the interview. They also downplayed the seriousness of his memory problems, stating that it was not unusual for individuals to struggle with recalling details from years ago.
Signs of Memory Issues
Contrary to the lawyers’ claims, the special counsel’s report highlighted major events that Biden struggled to remember, even during his 2017 interviews with a ghostwriter. The report described Biden as “struggling to remember events and straining at times to read and relay his own notebook entries,” indicating signs of diminished faculties and faulty memory.
The special counsel, Robert Hur, confirmed that Biden’s memory was worse during their interview. Biden could not recall when his vice presidency ended or began, and he even forgot when his son Beau died. His memory also appeared hazy when discussing the Afghanistan debate, mistakenly citing General Karl Eikenberry as an opponent instead of an ally.
Biden’s lawyers criticized the special counsel for treating Biden differently from other witnesses and using prejudicial language to describe his memory. They argued that such language was not supported by the facts and was inappropriate for a federal prosecutor.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
In what ways does the report’s characterization of Biden’s memory as “significantly limited” overlook a broader context of his cognitive abilities?
Rgued that the report’s focus on his memory problems was unfair and potentially misleading. They insisted that Biden’s memory issues were not significant and should not be a determining factor in assessing his fitness for office.
In their letter to Special Counsel Robert Hur, Sauber and Bauer criticized the report’s characterization of Biden’s memory as “significantly limited.” They argued that this assessment was based on a narrow interpretation of the evidence and ignored a broader context of Biden’s cognitive abilities.
Furthermore, they contended that the report’s mention of Biden presenting himself as a sympathetic elderly man with a poor memory during a trial was irrelevant and potentially prejudicial. They insisted that Biden should not be judged solely on his memory abilities, but rather on his overall competence and leadership qualities.
Sauber and Bauer also raised concerns about the potential impact of the report on Biden’s re-election campaign. They highlighted the fact that a majority of American voters have concerns about Biden’s age and health, and the report’s focus on his memory problems could further exacerbate these concerns. They urged Hur to reconsider the inclusion of these sections in the final report.
The special counsel’s report has sparked a debate about the relevance of memory issues in assessing a political leader’s fitness for office. While some argue that memory problems can have serious implications for decision-making and leadership, others insist that it should not be the sole determining factor, especially considering the complexities of the modern political landscape.
As President Biden continues to navigate the challenges of his presidency, it remains to be seen how this controversy will impact public perception of his leadership abilities. The debate surrounding his memory issues is likely to persist, as his supporters and critics continue to scrutinize his actions and statements. Ultimately, the American people will have the final say on whether they believe Biden’s memory problems are a cause for concern or if they should focus on other aspects of his presidency.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...