Georgetown University Democrats urge DC government to abolish legacy admissions
The Georgetown University College Democrats Push to End Legacy Admissions
The Georgetown University College Democrats are actively lobbying the D.C. Council to put an end to legacy admissions at both public and private schools in the city. Their proposal, called Furthering Admissions Inclusion and Representation, aims to ban admissions preferences for applicants who have family connections to former students or major donors. Notably, historically black colleges and universities would be exempt from this ban.
Following the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn race-based admissions practices in the Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard case, many advocates have shifted their focus to challenging legacy admissions at educational institutions.
Recently, the Virginia House of Delegates unanimously passed a bill to prohibit legacy admissions at public universities, and the state’s Senate did the same the week before. Governor Glenn Youngkin (R-VA) is expected to sign the bill, expressing his belief that admission to Virginia’s universities and colleges should be based on merit.
The Georgetown Democrats are leveraging Virginia’s actions as momentum in their pursuit of a groundbreaking ban on legacy admissions in both public and private schools, as stated in a press release.
According to statistics provided by the group from 2017, legacy applicants were given preferential treatment with a 30% admissions rate, compared to nonlegacy applicants who had a rate of 15.4%. They also highlighted an article from 2020, which claimed that one out of every ten students at Georgetown holds legacy status. Additionally, they celebrated the “91.6% increase in underrepresented minorities” at Johns Hopkins University after it decided to end legacy admissions.
The College Democrats have also circulated a petition urging Georgetown to discontinue the use of legacy admissions, regardless of the D.C. Council’s decision.
Similar moves to ban legacy admissions are being made by other lawmakers and schools.
In November, Senators Todd Young (R-IN) and Tim Kaine (D-VA) introduced a bill to eliminate the consideration of legacy and donor relationships in admissions. Senator Young emphasized that America should be a land of opportunity, not aristocracy, and that legacy admissions hinder opportunities for talented individuals while granting undue advantages to the well-connected.
Education Reform Now, an activist organization, reported that in 2020, approximately half of higher education institutions used some form of legacy consideration in their admissions process. Although around 100 schools have discontinued the use of legacy admissions since 2015, 787 schools still considered it in 2020.
Lawmakers in Connecticut and Maryland are also taking steps to ban legacy admissions.
Harvard University, which has faced scandals in recent months and was at the center of the Supreme Court case on affirmative action, is also facing renewed calls to end its legacy admission policy.
The prestigious private school, known for its selectivity, hinted at defying the Supreme Court ruling by suggesting that applicants discuss their race in admissions essays. Since the departure of Claudine Gay as Harvard’s president, there has been a heated debate surrounding the protection of diversity, equity, and inclusion at the forefront of the institution.
According to Jane Sujen Bock, a Harvard alumna and board member of the Coalition for a Diverse Harvard, “In the face of attacks on Harvard by anti-DEI forces leading to the devastating loss of President Gay, Harvard must reaffirm its commitment to DEI and racial justice more forcefully than ever. Abandoning legacy and donor preferences is one small step that Harvard can take to create a fairer, more inclusive university.”
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
How does the debate over legacy admissions connect to broader conversations about diversity, equity, and inclusion in higher education institutions
Tudent organizations across the country. In 2020, California passed a bill that prohibits public universities from considering legacy status in admissions decisions. Furthermore, organizations such as Students for Fair Admissions and the Generation Progress Action Fund have been advocating for the end of legacy admissions and working towards policy changes.
Advocates argue that legacy admissions perpetuate privilege and inequality in higher education. By giving preferential treatment to applicants with family connections, these policies can limit opportunities for talented students from underrepresented backgrounds. Critics argue that legacy admissions go against the principles of meritocracy and fairness, as they prioritize lineage over individual achievements and qualifications.
Supporters of legacy admissions claim that it fosters a sense of tradition, loyalty, and community within institutions. They argue that families who have a history with a particular university often feel a strong connection and are more likely to contribute to the school’s success through donations and engagement.
However, opponents argue that the benefits of legacy admissions do not outweigh the negative effects on equal access to education. They believe that universities should prioritize a diverse and inclusive student body, representative of different backgrounds and experiences.
The Georgetown University College Democrats are among the student organizations advocating for change in admissions policies. They believe that ending legacy admissions is a necessary step towards creating a fair and equitable admissions process. By eliminating preferential treatment based on family connections, they aim to level the playing field and give all applicants an equal opportunity.
The proposed Furthering Admissions Inclusion and Representation would not only apply to private institutions like Georgetown University but also public schools in the District of Columbia. This initiative aligns with a nationwide trend of challenging legacy admissions and promoting meritocracy.
Opponents of the movement argue that universities should have autonomy in their admissions processes and that eliminating legacy admissions could have unintended consequences. They worry that prohibiting legacy preferences could lead to a decrease in alumni engagement and decreased donations, resulting in financial strain for universities.
While the Georgetown University College Democrats are focusing on legacy admissions, they acknowledge the importance of addressing other forms of preferential treatment in the admissions process, such as athletic recruitment and standardized test score discrepancies.
The debate over legacy admissions raises important questions about equal access to education and the role of universities in promoting meritocracy. It reflects broader conversations about diversity, equity, and inclusion in higher education institutions across the United States.
As the Georgetown University College Democrats continue to advocate for the end of legacy admissions, they join a growing movement of students and activists who are working towards a more inclusive and equitable education system. Their efforts align with recent actions in Virginia and other states, signaling a potential turning point in admissions policies nationwide. Whether or not these efforts will result in tangible policy changes remains to be seen, but the conversation surrounding legacy admissions is likely to continue in the coming years.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...