Washington Examiner

Summit to retry carbon pipeline in North Dakota

Summit Carbon Solutions Gets Another ⁤Chance ⁣at Carbon Pipeline in⁢ North Dakota

Summit Carbon Solutions is set to make another attempt at building a carbon pipeline in North Dakota following a ⁤recent ruling by the state’s public service commission. This decision comes after changes made​ in 2019, which established that state rules take precedence over local zoning ordinances.

Randy Christmann, Chairman of the North Dakota⁣ Public Service Commission, acknowledged that this‍ may not be a‍ popular move, but emphasized that when ⁤it comes to ‍pipelines, local control is no longer an⁤ option. He clarified that⁣ this ruling specifically applies to pipelines, not electric transmission lines‍ or power plants.

The dispute arose when Burleigh County and a group called the ‌Bismarck Area Intervenors argued that the‌ state ⁣rule only applied⁤ to construction permits, while ‍Summit Carbon Solutions had only⁤ requested a certificate of site compatibility. However, the issue at hand ⁢was not whether the state rules preempt local zoning, but ‍rather whether this preemption is automatic.

“The Commission concludes that, based on the plain language of​ N.D.C.C. § 49-22.1-13, the approval of a‌ route permit for a​ gas or liquid​ transmission facility automatically supersedes and preempts local land use or⁢ zoning regulations, except for road ​use agreements, even though local ordinances may be filed for Commission⁢ review and consideration,”‌ the order ‌stated.

Summit Carbon Solutions will now have the opportunity to present their case in ⁣a new series of hearings as they seek approval for the construction of ⁤a 305-mile⁢ pipeline across the state. However, it is ⁣expected that the hearings will‌ not commence for approximately four weeks, ‌as the​ pipeline application has generated an extensive amount⁤ of documentation, comparable to that of the Dakota Access Pipeline case.

In December, Summit Carbon Solutions announced that they had already acquired 80% of the ⁣necessary land for the pipeline​ and had rerouted it in Burleigh, Emmons, and Dickey counties. Additionally, the ⁤pipeline will also pass through ⁢Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska,⁤ and⁣ South Dakota. While the Iowa⁤ Public Service Commission has held⁢ hearings on⁤ the matter, ‍no decision has been made yet. On the other hand, South Dakota regulators have rejected Summit’s application.

​ What are the potential economic benefits of building a carbon pipeline in North ⁢Dakota ‌and how does it ​enhance the state’s position as a leader in carbon capture and storage

Dakota Public Service Commission, announced the decision stating that Summit ‌Carbon Solutions has been granted an additional chance to construct a carbon pipeline in North Dakota.⁢ This ruling has ‌significant ​implications for the energy and environmental ‍sectors,⁣ as it demonstrates the‍ state’s commitment​ to carbon capture and storage efforts.

Summit ‍Carbon Solutions, a subsidiary of Summit Agricultural Group,⁢ has been working ​diligently​ to advance the⁢ construction of a carbon ⁣pipeline ‌in ​North Dakota. The company aims to capture‌ and‌ transport carbon ‍dioxide emissions from agricultural and industrial ‌sources and deploy them for use in enhanced oil ​recovery (EOR) operations.

The recent ruling by the North Dakota Public Service‌ Commission marks a‌ notable shift ‌in policy. Previously, local zoning ordinances had precedence over state regulations, which ​hindered the⁣ progress⁢ of carbon infrastructure projects. However, in 2019, changes were made to‌ establish that state rules would hold greater authority on such matters.

This decision has‍ not come without⁣ its fair share ​of ⁣controversies. Opposition ​to carbon‌ pipelines primarily stems from concerns​ regarding land usage and potential⁢ environmental ⁢impact. Some critics argue that pipelines could harm‌ the ⁣land or pose a risk of ⁤leakage and subsequent contamination.⁤ However, proponents of the project​ argue that a well-regulated, technologically advanced carbon pipeline system would mitigate such risks and⁢ offer‍ substantial environmental benefits.

The‌ decision to grant Summit Carbon ‌Solutions ‍another opportunity to build a carbon pipeline indicates the state’s recognition of the importance of carbon capture and storage. Carbon emissions from industrial and agricultural‍ activities are major​ contributors to greenhouse gas emissions, and effective carbon capture infrastructure⁤ can play a pivotal role ⁤in reducing these emissions.

Moreover, the deployment ⁢of ‍carbon dioxide for enhanced oil recovery ⁢operations is an environmentally friendly method for⁢ improving oil production. By injecting carbon dioxide ⁢into‌ aging oil ⁣fields, the ‍process increases oil recovery​ while simultaneously⁢ reducing the carbon footprint associated with‌ oil extraction. It presents a win-win situation for both the energy industry and the environment.

The construction of a carbon pipeline in North Dakota would ⁢also bring economic benefits to the⁣ region. It could ‍create jobs,⁣ attract investment, and accelerate‍ growth within the energy ‌sector. Additionally, it would bolster the state’s position​ as a leader in ⁣carbon capture and ⁤storage, ⁢attracting ⁣further technological advancements and collaborations.

However, it is essential to address concerns from those opposed to carbon pipelines. Strict regulatory measures, comprehensive risk assessments, and ‌regular monitoring should⁣ be implemented ‍to ensure that any potential environmental risks are minimized. Public engagement and transparency are crucial‌ for fostering trust and‍ facilitating informed ⁣decision-making processes.

Summit Carbon Solutions has consistently emphasized its commitment to responsible and sustainable carbon capture infrastructure. The company aims ​to work closely with local communities,​ stakeholders, and regulatory bodies to address ⁣any concerns and ensure the project’s ‍successful implementation.

In conclusion, the recent ruling by the North Dakota Public Service ​Commission granting Summit Carbon Solutions another opportunity to construct a carbon pipeline marks⁤ a significant milestone for carbon capture and storage efforts. By ⁢prioritizing ‍state regulations over local zoning ordinances, the ruling demonstrates ‌the⁤ state’s dedication to embracing⁢ innovative solutions⁤ to combat climate change. If‍ implemented​ with proper oversight and environmental safeguards,⁢ the project could prove to be a crucial step towards a low-carbon future⁤ while simultaneously generating economic benefits for the region.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker