oann

Newsom sued by ex-Jewish general over alleged anti-Semitic acts


(L-R) California ⁣Gov.⁢ Gavin Newsom speaks during a⁤ press conference on October 06, 2022 in‌ San Francisco, California. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

OAN’s⁤ Elizabeth Volberding
10:44 AM – Monday,⁢ February 12,​ 2024

California Governor Gavin Newsom​ and other state officials are facing legal ⁣action from a fired Air ⁣National⁣ Guard ⁣general, ​who claimed that he was wrongfully terminated last year and was subjected to “anti-Semitic harassment, discrimination, and retaliation.”

Advertisement

On January 24th, ⁣retired Brigadier ‍General Jeffrey Magram, who is Jewish, filed the lawsuit ‌ in a Los Angeles court against Newsom⁢ (D-Calif.) and other state authorities.⁣ Magram was allegedly fired last year after ⁢claims‍ that he “used troops to run personal errands.”

Magram ‍has‍ claimed that his former‍ leader,⁣ Major General Matthew Beevers,‌ who is​ currently the adjutant general‌ of the California Military ⁣Department, engaged in multiple anti-Semitic acts over a two-year​ period, creating a hostile work environment, and that Newsom ignored his⁣ complaints‌ regarding his ⁣behavior.

Magram stated that ⁣Beevers⁤ participated in a number of anti-Semitic ‌behaviors over a two-year period, and ‍that Newsom failed to respond to complaints about his misconduct.

News that Magram ⁢had used troops to run personal errands,⁢ such as taking his mother shopping, and that ‌he had prepared a fighter jet for a “possible domestic mission” in 2020 during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic caused headlines in January 2023.

As a result, this accelerated officials’ fears that the order would lead to a plane “buzzing” ⁢civilian protesters in an effort to disperse crowds.

The numerous accusations made⁣ against ​Magram before his ⁣involuntary transfer to the Air Force retired reserve, which at the time was reportedly “parallel” to‌ firing an‌ employee, were confirmed by an internal disciplinary board.

Nevertheless, Magram ⁤argued those explanations for his firing, claiming that it was‌ because⁢ he exposed Beevers’ purported actions, which he claims included calling out another general for being so cheap that he “gives Jewish people a ⁤bad name” and saying, “How Jewish can ‌you get?” in reference to a fellow ​Jewish service member’s attempt to get a military discount on ‌a ‍car.

Magram claims that at least one other senior officer saw each alleged ​instance of anti-Semitism by Beevers, and⁢ he ⁢reported them to ⁢Newsom’s office on six separate occasions.

When Magram reported the behavior, he claimed that Beevers ⁣started ‌“resurrecting and misrepresenting minor settled issues” that were as⁣ old as ten years old. He⁢ believes that this⁤ was an attempt to remove⁢ him ‍from the department before Beevers’ promotion to become adjutant general in August 2022.

According to the lawsuit, Beevers unsuccessfully tried to take away Magram’s disability claims, for which he was getting ‌benefits from the Guard, after he refused to resign. Beevers then obtained permission from ⁣Newsom to shorten Magram’s disability medical evaluation, which resulted in him losing some benefits.

The lawsuit further states that similar⁤ grievances regarding‌ Beevers’ actions from other senior ⁢officers ⁤were also ​ignored by Newsom’s office.

Magram made a statement to the⁢ press regarding the situation.

“I am extremely proud of my ‌more than 37 years of service to California ​and this great nation, but I​ still have serious concerns for the welfare of the servicemembers and civilians that‌ currently serve in⁢ the Department,” Magram said. “MG Beevers mounted an unprecedented defamatory campaign against me, and it was supported by the Governor.”

“I⁤ want⁣ to make sure this never happens again. MG ​Beevers actions were disturbingly aggressive and unexplainable, and he needs to be ​held accountable,” he continued. “It’s ⁢shocking that Governor Newsom disregarded⁤ the⁣ many ‍attempts made to ⁤correct this situation ‌and appointed MG Beevers permanently⁤ as the Adjutant General.”

The California Military Department, which denounced the lawsuit as “retaliatory and baseless” and provided documents demonstrating Magram’s termination‌ for causing the department to “lose faith, trust, and​ confidence” in his ability to continue⁤ serving as a leader in the ‌organization, was‌ referred by Newsom’s office when the ⁣press contacted for comment.

“In 2021, the United States Air Force Inspector General investigated Brigadier General Magram for multiple instances of misconduct involving ethical violations and ‌maltreatment ​of subordinates. ‍On ⁤26 October 2021, the Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force issued Brigadier General Magram a Letter of Admonishment for these indiscretions,” a​ department spokesperson said in a statement. “This independent action by the Air Force⁢ formed the basis of a removal action initiated by the California Military ⁢Department to hold Gen. Magram accountable for his misconduct. The recommended discipline was ⁤unanimously upheld by a ⁢board of three senior officers with no ⁤involvement in the underlying⁢ incidents. All actions were taken based ⁤on independent ​investigations by the U.S. Air Force and the Military Department Inspector ​General. We look forward to defending our actions to hold a senior leader accountable⁢ for his misconduct.”

Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox ‌for free. Subscribe‌ here. https://www.oann.com/alerts

Share this post!

The White House Treasury Department confirms they were ⁣monitoring Americans’ bank transactions for years.

with Joe Hoft

with John McEntee

with⁤ Rep. ⁣Diamond Garcia

Nvidia briefly surpassed⁢ Amazon.com Inc in⁢ market capitalization on Monday.

Nvidia is building a ​new business unit focused on designing bespoke chips for ‍cloud computing firms and others.

Pinterest dropped over 10% in a sign ​that smaller social media platforms ⁣could be losing the battle to bigger players‍ for⁣ ad‍ dollars.

Google says consumers can pay for‍ better reasoning capabilities as it vies⁢ with ​Microsoft to win subscriptions.

rnrn

What ⁢evidence or documentation does the California Military Department have‌ to ⁢support their ‌claim that Magram’s termination was justified due to misconduct and​ ethical violations

California Governor Gavin Newsom and other state officials are currently facing legal action from ⁢retired Brigadier General Jeffrey ⁣Magram, who claims that he was wrongfully terminated‍ last year and subjected to anti-Semitic harassment, discrimination, and retaliation. Magram, who is Jewish, filed a lawsuit against Newsom and other state authorities⁤ in a⁢ Los Angeles court ⁣on January 24th.

According to⁤ the lawsuit, Magram ⁣alleges that Major General Matthew Beevers, who is currently the adjutant ​general of the California Military Department, engaged in multiple ⁣anti-Semitic acts over a two-year period, creating a hostile‌ work environment. ⁢Magram further claims that Newsom ignored his complaints regarding⁣ Beevers’ behavior.

The initial news that led to Magram’s firing involved ⁤allegations that he used troops to run personal errands, such‌ as taking his mother shopping, and prepared a​ fighter jet for a “possible domestic mission” during the early ‍stages ​of the ⁤COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. This raised ⁤concerns among⁤ officials that the order could lead to a plane “buzzing” civilian protesters to disperse crowds.

While Magram’s firing was confirmed by an internal disciplinary board, he argues that it was because he ​exposed Beevers’ alleged actions, which included derogatory⁢ comments about another general and a fellow Jewish service‌ member. Magram claims that at least one‌ other senior officer witnessed these instances of anti-Semitism and reported them ​to Newsom’s office on six separate occasions.

The ​lawsuit also states that Beevers attempted to take away Magram’s disability claims, resulting in a loss of benefits, after he refused to resign. Beevers obtained⁢ permission from Newsom to shorten Magram’s disability medical‍ evaluation. The lawsuit further claims that other senior⁣ officers’ grievances regarding Beevers’ actions were also ignored by Newsom’s office.

Magram released a statement to the press, expressing his concerns for the welfare of the servicemembers‍ and civilians currently serving in the department. He called Beevers’ actions “disturbingly ⁢aggressive and unexplainable” and ‌called for him ⁣to be held accountable. Magram⁣ criticized Newsom for disregarding attempts to address the situation and appointing Beevers permanently as the Adjutant ‍General.

In response to the lawsuit, the California Military Department denounced it as ‍”retaliatory and baseless” and referred⁢ to documents demonstrating Magram’s termination for causing the ‌department to lose⁢ faith, trust, and confidence in his leadership abilities. They cited investigations by the United States Air Force Inspector General in 2021, which resulted‌ in a ⁢Letter of ‍Admonishment for Magram due to misconduct and ethical violations.

The outcome of this lawsuit will determine whether Magram’s claims of anti-Semitic harassment, discrimination,⁣ and retaliation ⁢are proven and whether there will be any repercussions for‌ Newsom and other state‌ officials involved in this case.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker