UN Official: Hamas is a ‘Political Movement,’ Not a Terrorist Organization

Martin Griffiths: Hamas is a ​Political Movement, Not a Terrorist Group

In a recent interview, Martin Griffiths, the UN Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Coordinator, made a controversial statement, insisting that Hamas should be seen as a “political movement” rather than a terrorist group.

When asked about Israel’s‍ plans to eliminate Hamas and exclude them from future negotiations regarding Gaza, Griffiths acknowledged ​the difficulty of such a ⁤task. Drawing from ⁢his experience working with various terrorist and insurgent groups, he emphasized the importance of a ⁣negotiated solution that addresses⁣ the aspirations of these groups. He ⁢also highlighted ‌the limited success of military victories against well-established groups.

Unsurprisingly, Griffiths’ remarks ​sparked ‌outrage from Israel, with the state’s official ​Twitter account condemning the UN’s stance on Hamas. They criticized the UN for⁣ considering Hamas a political organization despite their involvement in acts of violence against civilians.

According to @UNReliefChief,⁣ Hamas​ is not a terrorist organization.

They are a political organization, who from time to time murders, rapes and kidnaps civilians to let off steam.

What an ‌abomination the @UN has become. pic.twitter.com/E6cEFjgMmd

— Israel ישראל 🇮🇱 (@Israel) February 15, 2024

Eylon Levy, an‍ Israeli government spokesman, also criticized Griffiths, accusing him of using his position to protect Hamas instead of demanding their surrender.

Martin Griffiths, @UNReliefChief, denies‌ Hamas ‍is a⁢ terrorist organization. No wonder he is abusing his power to save Hamas’ skin after the deadliest terror attack since 9/11 instead of demanding its surrender. pic.twitter.com/0FIA3fmtDU

— Eylon ‌Levy (@EylonALevy) February‍ 15, 2024

In response to the backlash, Griffiths attempted to clarify his position through a tweet. He acknowledged that Hamas is not ‌officially designated as a terrorist organization by the United Nations Security Council⁢ but condemned their acts of terror as horrific and reprehensible.

Just to clarify: Hamas is not on the list ‌of groups designated as terrorist organizations by the United Nations Security ‌Council.

This doesn’t make their acts of terror on 7 October any‍ less horrific and reprehensible, as I’ve⁣ been saying all along.

—‌ Martin Griffiths (@UNReliefChief) February 15, 2024

Israel’s‍ response to Griffiths’ tweet was scathing, accusing him of being a Hamas apologist and⁣ disrespecting the victims of Hamas’ actions.

Just to clarify: @UNReliefChief you’re a ⁢Hamas apologist​ and your statements are an insult to every single victim of October 7th.

Pathetic. https://t.co/blfZgLHyzl

— Israel ישראל 🇮🇱 (@Israel) February 15, ‍2024

Despite ⁣the controversy, Griffiths did not provide a detailed explanation for why he ​referred to Hamas as a “political movement.”

The German Foreign Office also ⁤weighed in on the matter, contradicting Griffiths’ statement by highlighting ‍that ‍the European ⁢Union and many others have designated Hamas as a terrorist organization.

To make it crystal clear: The EU‍ has listed Hamas as a terrorist⁢ organization and so have many others.

— GermanForeignOffice (@GermanyDiplo) February 15, 2024

What are the potential implications of acknowledging the political ⁤aspirations ⁣of groups like Hamas in the pursuit of lasting peace?

Quote class=”twitter-tweet” data-width=”500″ data-dnt=”true”>

To ⁣clarify, I did⁤ not say that Hamas is not a terrorist organization. They are not officially designated as such by the UN Security Council, but their acts of terror are ​indeed horrific and reprehensible. We must work⁤ towards a peaceful⁢ resolution for all parties involved. pic.twitter.com/U2y2SW6a3o

— Martin ‍Griffiths (@UNReliefChief) February 15, 2024

While some argue that ⁤Griffiths’ statement undermines ‌the victims of Hamas’ attacks and the legitimacy of Israel’s security concerns, others believe that understanding Hamas⁤ as a political movement is crucial for seeking a lasting and peaceful solution ‌to the Israeli-Palestinian‌ conflict.

It is important to note that ⁤the⁤ classification of Hamas as a terrorist group is not universally⁣ agreed upon. The European Union, for example, distinguishes between Hamas as a‌ political‌ organization and its armed branch. This distinction reflects the complexity of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and ‍the different perspectives on how to approach it.

Griffiths’ statement invites us to critically examine our understanding of ⁢political movements and terrorism. ‍It raises questions about the root causes ⁤of terrorism and whether military force alone can effectively combat it. By acknowledging the political aspirations⁣ of groups ‍like ⁣Hamas, Griffiths ⁣suggests that a comprehensive approach that addresses the underlying ‌issues of ⁤the Israeli-Palestinian conflict may be more effective in achieving lasting peace.

While‍ the debate over​ the classification of Hamas continues,⁣ it is imperative that all parties involved in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict engage in meaningful dialogue and diplomacy to reach a solution. The international community, including the United Nations, can play a ‌vital role in facilitating this process and​ ensuring that the voices and concerns of all stakeholders are heard and addressed.

Ultimately,⁣ the aim ⁤should ⁣be to find a solution that guarantees the security and well-being of both Israelis and Palestinians, while respecting the‌ principles of human ​rights and international law. By viewing Hamas⁤ as ⁣a political movement and engaging with them in ​negotiations, it may be possible to find common ground and ultimately work towards a peaceful resolution​ of⁤ the conflict.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases