British hospitals claim that milk from men is just as beneficial for babies as mothers’ breast milk, which is considered remarkable
British Trust Claims Milk from Biological Men is as Good as Breast Milk for Babies
In a controversial move, a British trust overseeing multiple hospitals has sparked a heated debate by asserting that milk produced by biological men, with the help of ingested hormones, is just as beneficial for babies as breast milk from their mothers.
Dr. Rachael James, the medical director of the University of Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust (USHT), known for its progressive stance on gender terminology, wrote a letter last August to an organization called Children of Transitioners. In the letter, she argued that the term “human milk” should be considered neutral and not gender-biased, as it is the ideal food for infants.
Dr. James further explained that medications can be used to induce lactation in biological men, similar to the natural hormones that stimulate lactation after childbirth. She claimed that the available evidence demonstrates that the milk produced in this way is comparable to that produced by mothers after giving birth.
The USHT cited a 2022 study that measured “infant milk testosterone concentrations” and found no observable side effects on babies fed milk from biological men who were lactating transgender women. However, this study has reportedly been rejected by experts, as reported by The Daily Mail.
In 2021, USHT introduced Great Britain’s first clinical and language guidelines supporting trans and non-binary birthing individuals. These guidelines asserted that men who had taken hormones could produce milk comparable to that produced after childbirth.
Critics, such as Lottie Moore from Policy Exchange, argue that the trust’s claims are unbalanced and naive. Moore emphasizes that a child’s welfare should always take precedence over identity politics and belief systems that lack evidence. She believes that the NHS should not endorse such ideas.
Despite the controversy, a spokesperson for USHT has stated that they stand by the facts presented in the letter and the evidence supporting them.
This is what this madness has wrought folks. Being “pc”/polite/saying nothing when you know it’s wrong has gotten us to abusing babies. Pls pls pls find your voice. This is sick. It’s mental illness – and we are enabling it. https://t.co/voY6BiKaBR
— Megyn Kelly (@megynkelly) February 18, 2024
What are the potential benefits and risks of using hormone-treated milk from transgender men as a substitute for breast milk from biological women?
Rther explained that the trust believes in promoting inclusivity and acceptance of all individuals, including transgender men who may have the ability to produce milk through the use of hormone therapy. She stated that breast milk provides numerous benefits to infants, such as essential nutrients, antibodies, and a reduced risk of certain health conditions.
This stance has drawn both support and criticism from various individuals and organizations. On one hand, proponents of the trust’s position argue that it aligns with a more inclusive and diverse understanding of gender and parenting. They contend that gender should not limit individuals’ ability to provide necessary nutrition and care for their babies.
On the other hand, critics argue that breast milk from biological women is specifically tailored to meet the needs of infants and contains unique components that cannot be replicated. They express concerns regarding the potential long-term effects of introducing hormone-treated milk to infants and question the safety and adequacy of such a substitute.
The British trust’s claim has also raised questions regarding the societal and cultural significance of breastfeeding. Breastfeeding has long been associated with the biological bond between mother and baby, offering emotional and psychological benefits in addition to nutritional ones. Some argue that promoting the use of milk from biological men may undermine this cherished tradition and diminish its cultural value.
In response to the controversy, Dr. James emphasized that the trust acknowledges the importance of breastfeeding and recognizes the unique benefits it provides. However, she believes that expanding the definition of “human milk” to include milk produced by transgender men can offer an alternative for those who are unable or choose not to breastfeed.
The British trust’s assertion is certainly thought-provoking and has ignited a passionate debate on various fronts. It brings to light important questions about gender, parenting, and the societal understanding of breastfeeding. While opinions on this matter may continue to differ, it is crucial to approach these discussions with respect, empathy, and a commitment to ensuring the health and well-being of all infants.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...