IRS diversity training includes material from a trans academic advocating for the “death of whiteness

The IRS’s Diversity, Equity, and⁢ Inclusion Training Sparks​ Controversy

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has come under‍ fire for its diversity, equity, and⁤ inclusion (DEI) training, which featured content from a transgender professor advocating for ⁣the​ “death of whiteness.” The training, obtained by Judicial Watch, was part ⁤of⁢ a mandatory program⁢ for IRS investigators and included a section by Dafina Lazarus Stewart, a ⁤transgender professor at the University of Denver.

Stewart,‍ who has focused her academic work on “whiteness,” called on other academics to “commit to the death of whiteness”​ in an academic ‌journal article. The⁢ training materials also included questions that seemed to suggest that “whiteness” was a​ threat to other cultures.

This training is just one example ‌of the Biden administration’s efforts to ‍promote⁣ far-left ideology on race ​and gender. The⁣ administration has signed executive⁤ orders to institutionalize‌ Critical Race ‌Theory and radical gender ideology in federal agencies.

Stewart’s article, titled⁣ “‘Dead Honky’ – Against The Technologies of ‌(White) Violence,” argues that “whiteness is itself a violence” and calls for Critical Race Theorists to “commit to the death of whiteness.” The article was ⁤published in the International Journal of Qualitative Studies⁤ in Education, which ‌has also published articles advocating for the eradication of whiteness.

The IRS’s Office of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion, led by Chief Diversity ​Officer Carrie Holland, ‌is responsible for implementing the DEI⁣ agenda. The previous Chief Diversity Officer, Valerie Gunter, made⁢ a​ salary of $200,000 a year, more than double the ⁣median household income.

This training is part⁢ of a larger trend of DEI initiatives being ‌pushed throughout the ​federal government. The National Security Association (NSA) created a DEI glossary endorsing ​Critical Race Theory and gender ideology, and other agencies have funded projects promoting gender ideology.

While the Biden administration continues to push its ideological agenda, there are⁢ plans⁤ to dismantle the administrative state under a potential Trump presidency in 2024. Advocates⁣ for a‍ policy called Schedule F aim⁣ to remove ⁤civil service employment protections from unelected bureaucrats, giving the president⁣ the power to fire those ‌who obstruct his policy objectives.

Should the IRS prioritize ​its limited resources towards​ promoting a divisive social⁤ ideology or towards improving taxpayer services and ⁤reducing fraud

A professor of higher education at ⁤Bowling Green‍ State University in Ohio.

Stewart’s section of the training, titled⁣ “Understanding Whiteness and Building an Authentic White Identity,” has sparked controversy and criticism for its ⁢divisive and potentially offensive content. ​In her presentation, Stewart argues that whiteness is a ‌social construct that perpetuates inequality and suggests that individuals should aim for the “death of whiteness” in⁤ order to ‌achieve a more ⁢equitable society.

Many‌ believe that the inclusion⁤ of such extreme⁣ views in a mandatory training program for IRS investigators is inappropriate and⁤ raises concerns about bias within⁢ the agency. The IRS is ⁣responsible for enforcing ​tax laws ‍and collecting⁢ revenue for⁢ the federal government, ‍and its⁣ employees should be trained in ⁣a fair and unbiased manner.

Critics‌ argue that⁣ introducing controversial and politically charged ideas into‍ a training session for IRS investigators undermines the agency’s credibility and impartiality. It ⁣is ⁣essential that the IRS be ⁢seen as an objective institution that ⁢treats all ⁢taxpayers fairly​ and without any preference or bias. Including content that⁣ promotes the ⁣”death of whiteness” may give the impression that the‌ IRS is⁤ endorsing a particular political agenda, which​ undermines its ability ⁢to carry out its duties effectively.

Furthermore, opponents⁣ of the ​training argue that it is unnecessary⁢ and distracts ⁢from the IRS’s primary functions. Instead of focusing on​ enforcing tax ​laws and ensuring compliance, the⁤ agency‌ seems to be devoting resources​ to promoting a ‌divisive ⁣social ideology. Some believe that the IRS’s limited resources should be‌ directed towards improving ‍taxpayer services‌ and reducing fraud, rather than engaging ​in controversial and potentially inflammatory training programs.

In response to the ⁢controversy, the ⁤IRS has defended‌ its diversity, equity,​ and inclusion⁢ training as an important tool for‍ creating a more ‍inclusive work‌ environment. The ​agency argues that it is committed to​ fostering‌ a workplace culture that values diversity and ensures equal treatment for all employees.

However, ⁣it is important to note that diversity and⁢ inclusion training ​should aim ‌to promote understanding, empathy, and‍ respect among employees. While it is ⁢important to⁤ acknowledge and address‍ issues ⁤of‍ inequality and⁤ discrimination, it is equally ⁢crucial to⁤ do so in a manner that does not demonize or alienate any⁣ particular group.

In conclusion, the IRS’s diversity, equity, and inclusion‍ training has ignited ⁢controversy⁣ due to the inclusion ‍of divisive and potentially ‌offensive content.⁢ This⁤ training, ​featuring a section by a transgender professor ⁣advocating for the “death of⁣ whiteness,” raises concerns about bias and the impartiality of ⁤the agency. The IRS should ensure that its⁤ training programs promote unity, respect, and ⁣fairness among employees, while also focusing on its core responsibilities of tax enforcement and taxpayer service.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases