Biden administration faces lawsuit over surveillance records amidst FISA debate
EXCLUSIVE: Cato Institute Sues Biden Administration for Surveillance Violation Records
The Cato Institute has taken legal action against the Biden administration, demanding records of potential surveillance violations. This comes as Congress debates the reauthorization of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), a crucial statute set to expire on April 19. The institute argues that Congress should have access to information on past violations by the FBI, CIA, and NSA before making a decision.
Seeking Transparency and Accountability
Last June, Cato requested audit records from the Department of Justice regarding potential FISA violations. However, they have received no response. In response, Cato is filing an injunction to compel the release of these records by March 29. The goal is to ensure that Congress can consider them in the reauthorization debate.
Cato Institute senior fellow Patrick Eddington expressed concern about the erosion of personal privacy due to laws like the PATRIOT Act and the FISA Amendments Act. He stated, “The people of our country are demonstrably and dangerously less free from government surveillance abuses and related political repression than at any point since the worst days of the Cold War.”
Debate Over Warrant Requirement
The reauthorization debate in Congress has sparked controversy, particularly regarding the need for warrants to access FISA data on U.S. citizens. National security adviser Jake Sullivan raised eyebrows when he suggested that the Biden administration opposes a warrant requirement. This implies that Congress may need to override a potential veto from President Biden to enforce such a requirement.
Concerns and Alleged Violations
Section 702 of FISA allows the government to conduct surveillance on foreign nationals without a warrant, even if the communication involves someone on American soil. While this tool has been credited with preventing national security threats, it has also faced criticism for potentially infringing on the privacy of U.S. citizens.
Cato argues that FISA has been repeatedly violated by multiple presidential administrations since the enactment of Section 702 in 2008. These violations allegedly include searches of stored data collected under the program, targeting groups engaged in First Amendment protected activities, and even revealing the names of political campaign donors.
Push for Reform
Conservative groups, including those who claim that FISA was used to spy on former President Donald Trump’s political campaigns, are advocating for reform. Representatives Andy Biggs and Warren Davidson have proposed amendments to require warrants or court orders before accessing FISA data on citizens and to prevent the government from circumventing constitutional protections.
Call for Transparency
Cato emphasizes that the audit records they seek are crucial for an informed debate on FISA reauthorization. These records have never been made public, denying both the public and Congress the ability to assess the extent of abuses and the effectiveness of measures to curb them. The institute argues that the release of these records by March 29 is necessary to prevent irreparable harm and to serve the public interest.
The lawsuit filed by Cato requests the processing and release of the records by the specified date, as well as a hearing within 21 days if the court does not rule on the motion sooner. The institute believes it is likely to succeed in its case and highlights the urgent need for information about the integrity and accuracy of FISA Section 702.
The Washington Examiner has reached out to the White House and the Department of Justice for comment.
How do laws like the PATRIOT Act and the FISA Amendments Act contribute to the erosion of personal privacy and increased government surveillance abuses, according to Patrick Eddington
Ign targets located outside the United States for foreign intelligence purposes. However, it has come under scrutiny for potential violations of privacy rights of U.S. citizens.
The Cato Institute contends that the FBI, CIA, and NSA have historically abused their surveillance powers, resulting in privacy breaches and infringements upon civil liberties. They argue that before Congress makes a decision on the reauthorization of Section 702, it is essential to have access to information on past violations to ensure transparency and accountability.
The lack of response from the Department of Justice to Cato’s request for audit records is a cause for concern. By filing an injunction, the Institute aims to force the release of these records before the reauthorization debate, allowing Congress to make an informed decision.
Patrick Eddington, senior fellow at the Cato Institute, raises alarm about the erosion of personal privacy caused by laws like the PATRIOT Act and the FISA Amendments Act. He emphasizes that the American people are now facing increased government surveillance abuses and political repression, surpassing even the levels seen during the Cold War.
One of the key points of contention in the reauthorization debate is the requirement for warrants to access FISA data on U.S. citizens. The Biden administration’s stance opposing a warrant requirement has sparked controversy. If Congress decides to include a warrant requirement, it may face the challenge of overriding a potential veto from President Biden.
Section 702 of FISA is designed to gather intelligence on foreign targets. However, concerns have been raised that this authority has been used to collect information on U.S. citizens without proper justification. These alleged violations further underscore the need for increased transparency and safeguards to protect individual privacy.
In conclusion, the Cato Institute’s lawsuit against the Biden administration seeks to ensure transparency and accountability in the debate over the reauthorization of Section 702 of FISA. The release of audit records would provide crucial information on past violations and enable Congress to make an informed decision. As the controversy over the warrant requirement rages on, it remains to be seen how this issue will ultimately be resolved.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...