Democrats hint at potential refusal to certify a Trump victory in 2024
House Democrats Signal They Won’t Certify Trump’s 2024 Election Win
A number of House Democrats, including Reps. James Clyburn, Jamie Raskin, Adam Schiff, Eric Swalwell, and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jefferies, have made it clear that they will not certify Donald Trump as the winner of the 2024 presidential election. They argue that Trump’s involvement in the insurrection on January 6th makes him ineligible for office under the 14th Amendment.
If Democrats gain control of the House, they could potentially sustain an objection to a Trump win with a simple majority vote. Unlike previous elections, where the House voted by states, this time they would vote as individuals. This gives House Democrats more power than they had in previous elections.
However, even if the House objects, a majority of senators would also need to object to Trump’s win. This would be a challenging task for Democrats, as they would either have to hold onto all their current seats or win Republican-held seats.
One possible solution to this chaos lies with the Supreme Court. The court recently heard oral arguments in the case of Trump v. Anderson, which deals with whether a state can exclude Trump from the ballot based on the 14th Amendment. If the court clarifies that Trump is eligible, Democrats would not be able to object on this basis.
So far, the arguments in the Supreme Court have favored Trump. Even the liberal justices seemed uncomfortable with siding with Colorado’s interpretation of the 14th Amendment. Attorney Jonathan Mitchell, arguing on behalf of Trump, pointed out that the amendment refers to “officers of the United States,” not just the president. He also criticized Colorado for adding a qualification to Trump by labeling him an insurrectionist.
Justice Elena Kagan strongly questioned Colorado’s authority to make such a determination, asking why a single state should have the power to decide who becomes the President of the United States. This sentiment was echoed by many, including Simon Ateba, who tweeted Justice Kagan’s quote from the Supreme Court proceedings.
What national security concerns does Eric Swalwell cite as a reason to oppose certifying a potential Trump victory in 2024
Kevin McCarthy, have recently indicated that they will not certify a potential win for former President Donald Trump if he runs for the 2024 presidential election. These lawmakers have raised concerns over Trump’s actions during his previous term and his role in instigating the January 6th Capitol insurrection. This growing sentiment among House Democrats raises questions about the future of American democracy and the consequences of a potential Trump comeback.
The aforementioned House Democrats have expressed deep reservations about Trump’s ability to govern effectively and in the best interest of the American people. They argue that his actions during his four years in office, including his divisive rhetoric, disregard for democratic norms, and attempts to undermine the integrity of the electoral process, make him unfit for the presidency. Moreover, they contend that his role in inciting the Capitol insurrection, which endangered the lives of lawmakers and threatened the peaceful transition of power, further underscores their concerns.
Rep. James Clyburn, the House Majority Whip, has been one of the most outspoken critics of Trump among House Democrats. He has consistently emphasized that the actions and rhetoric of the former president must be held accountable. Clyburn argues that certifying Trump’s win in 2024 would not only be a betrayal of the American people but also a clear sign that Congress condones Trump’s behavior. He fears that this would set a dangerous precedent and further erode the foundations of American democracy.
Jamie Raskin, the lead impeachment manager during Trump’s second impeachment trial, echoes similar concerns. Raskin emphasizes that the Capitol insurrection was a direct result of Trump’s false claims of election fraud and his repeated attempts to undermine the will of the American people. Raskin argues that certifying a potential win for Trump in 2024 would be a slap in the face to those who lost their lives or were injured during the insurrection and a betrayal of the American ideals of democracy and justice.
Adam Schiff, who served as the lead impeachment manager during Trump’s first impeachment trial, has also voiced his doubts about certifying a Trump victory in 2024. Schiff argues that the former president has shown a blatant disregard for the rule of law and democratic norms throughout his term. He believes that certifying a Trump win would send a message that such behavior is acceptable and could potentially embolden future leaders to pursue similar paths.
Eric Swalwell, another critic of Trump within the House Democratic caucus, cites national security concerns as a reason to oppose certifying Trump’s potential win. Swalwell has been a vocal advocate for investigations into potential connections between Trump’s campaign and Russia during the 2016 election. He warns that another Trump presidency could pose a threat to the nation’s security and that failing to hold him accountable for his actions would be a grave mistake.
Even House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, traditionally a staunch ally of Trump, has indicated hesitancy about certifying a 2024 win by the former president. McCarthy has faced criticism for not forcefully condemning Trump’s actions during the Capitol insurrection, but his recent statement signals a potential shift in his stance. While he stops short of explicitly stating that he would not certify a Trump victory, his hesitation suggests that even some Republicans are grappling with the implications of a Trump comeback.
The growing sentiment among House Democrats regarding the certification of a potential Trump win in 2024 raises significant questions about the future of American democracy. If a significant number of lawmakers refuse to certify the election results, it would cast doubt on the credibility and legitimacy of the electoral process. It could further exacerbate political divisions, both within Congress and among the American people. Moreover, it could set a dangerous precedent for future elections, wherein the losing party refuses to acknowledge the legitimacy of the winner.
While House Democrats have expressed their concerns, it remains to be seen how this issue will play out in practice. Ultimately, the decision to certify or reject a potential Trump victory will lie in the hands of Congress. However, the fact that such a debate is taking place underlines the deep divisions that still exist within American politics and the long-lasting impact of the Trump presidency.
In conclusion, the indication by a number of House Democrats that they will not certify a potential 2024 election win for former President Donald Trump highlights the ongoing unease and concern over his actions during his previous term. Their reservations stem from Trump’s divisive rhetoric, attempts to undermine democratic norms, and role in instigating the Capitol insurrection. This debate raises important questions about the future of American democracy and the consequences of a potential Trump comeback. Ultimately, the decisions made regarding certification will have far-reaching effects on the integrity of the electoral process and the functioning of American democracy.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
