Appeals Court Judge rejects Trump’s bid to postpone payment for NY business fraud fine

President Trump Denied Request to Delay⁣ $464 Million Fraud Fine

In a blow to former President Donald Trump, a New ​York Appeals Court judge has‌ denied ⁤his ⁤request to postpone the payment of his $464 million civil business⁢ fraud‌ fine. The ruling, delivered by Associate⁢ Justice Anil Singh, states that Trump must ​post bond for the full amount by March 25.

The civil ‍fraud trial, initiated by New York ​Democratic Attorney General Letitia ​James, accused Trump of inflating his net ‌worth and deceiving lenders. Judge Arthur Engoron sided with James, ordering Trump ‍to pay $350 million initially, which increased to $454 ⁢million with interest. Additionally,⁣ Trump and his sons were⁢ barred from ⁣running their⁢ business in​ New York for two to three years.

However, Singh’s ruling allows Trump and his sons to continue ‌operating their ​business while they appeal‍ Engoron’s decision. The ban on ‌Trump obtaining‌ loans from a New York​ bank has also been‌ lifted, potentially granting him access⁤ to equity in his assets.

Trump has already ⁣filed an appeal, claiming that Engoron made errors⁤ of law and fact and exceeded his ⁣jurisdiction. The case ‍will be heard by the Appeals Court next⁢ month, with James’ brief due on March 11 and Trump’s replies due on March 18.

Throughout the case, Trump has maintained his‍ innocence, arguing that his ‌assets were‍ undervalued. His ‌defense ​team presented former bank executives who vouched for Trump’s credibility and an accounting professor who found no evidence⁢ of fraud in ‌his financial statements.

Following Engoron’s ruling, ⁤Trump criticized the judge and Attorney General James, calling⁤ the decision a “Complete and Total SHAM.”

CLICK HERE​ TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP

What are the ‍specific allegations made by the state of⁢ New York against President Trump and⁤ his organization in the​ $464 ‌million⁢ fraud ‍financial case?

​ Inancial ‍Case

President ⁣Trump has recently been denied his request to delay a $464 million fraud financial case against him. The ⁣case stems from allegations made by‌ the state of New York, which claims that the⁣ Trump Organization, as​ well as President Trump himself,⁣ engaged in fraudulent ⁣business‍ practices.

The lawsuit, filed by New York Attorney General⁣ Letitia James, alleges ‍that President Trump and ​his organization misled investors and provided false information‍ about their‍ business​ ventures. It‍ specifically targets the financing ‌of four ⁣separate projects, including Trump Tower in Manhattan and Trump International⁣ Hotel⁢ & Tower ⁣in⁣ Chicago.

President Trump had requested a delay ‍in the proceedings due​ to his ⁢ongoing ​role as the President​ of the⁤ United States.⁣ His legal team argued that the case would serve⁣ as a⁣ significant distraction for him and‌ would prevent him from fulfilling his duties as⁤ President. However,‍ the judge dismissed these arguments, ​stating that President Trump is not‌ immune from legal proceedings while in ⁢office.

This ⁢ruling represents a significant blow to President Trump, who ⁢now⁣ has to face‌ the legal consequences of⁢ the allegations made against him. It also highlights the fact that no ⁢one is above the law,⁤ even ⁣the​ President of the United States.

Fraud cases of this magnitude are not uncommon in the business world, but when they involve the President‌ of the United States, it raises concerns about the integrity and ethics⁢ of the‍ person holding the highest office in the country. The outcome of this​ case will have a significant impact on President Trump’s reputation and legacy.

It is important to note that President Trump has denied all allegations made against him and ​his organization. He has consistently maintained his innocence, ⁤claiming that the lawsuit is politically motivated. ⁣However,⁤ the court’s decision to deny his‍ request for ⁤a delay suggests that there is⁢ enough evidence to‌ proceed with the case.

The financial implications of this case are also substantial. If the allegations are proven true, ‌President Trump and his organization could face significant fines and penalties. Additionally, the negative publicity surrounding the case could damage their reputation and potentially impact their business ventures.

As President Trump continues to navigate this legal battle, it ‍raises questions about the level of transparency and accountability that should be expected ​from‌ the⁢ highest office ⁤in the country. It ⁢also highlights ‍the importance of a ⁤robust legal system that holds everyone accountable, regardless of their position or ⁤influence.

In conclusion, President Trump’s request to delay a $464 million fraud financial case against him‌ has been denied. The ruling emphasizes that no one, including the President of the United⁤ States, is immune from legal proceedings. This case will​ have significant implications ​for President⁢ Trump’s⁤ reputation⁣ and legacy, as‍ well⁤ as potentially impact his ‌organization’s financial standing. The outcome of this case ⁣will serve as a reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability in⁤ our⁣ legal system.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases