Garland deems Voter ID laws ‘unnecessary
Attorney General Merrick Garland Denounces Voter ID Requirements as Discriminatory and Unnecessary
Speaking on Sunday in Selma, Alabama, U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland passionately criticized the implementation of voter ID requirements by states, labeling them as “discriminatory, burdensome, and unnecessary.” Garland delivered his remarks at the Tabernacle Baptist Church, commemorating the 59th anniversary of the brutal attack on civil rights demonstrators by Selma police officers.
“There are many things that are open to debate in America,” Garland declared, emphasizing that the right of all eligible citizens to vote and have their vote counted should not be one of them. However, he did not explicitly define what he meant by “eligible.”
Highlighting the historical denial of voting rights to black people, Garland pointed out that recent court decisions have significantly weakened the protections of the Voting Rights Act, which the marchers on the Edmund Pettus Bridge fought for 59 years ago. He also noted a concerning surge in legislative measures that make it increasingly difficult for millions of eligible voters to cast their ballots and choose their representatives.
“The right to vote is still under attack,” Garland declared, emphasizing the Justice Department’s commitment to fight back. As one of his first actions as Attorney General, he doubled the number of lawyers in the Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division.
Garland firmly stated, “That is why we are challenging efforts by states and jurisdictions to implement discriminatory, burdensome, and unnecessary restrictions on access to the ballot, including those related to mail-in voting, the use of drop boxes, and voter ID requirements.”
Biden AG Merrick Garland, speaking at an Alabama church, says election integrity efforts — such as voter ID requirements and restrictions on ballot “drop boxes” — are ”discriminatory, burdensome, and unnecessary.” pic.twitter.com/UExpO3nGbD
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) March 3, 2024
Debate Surrounding Voter ID Laws
According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, 36 state laws require voters to show some form of identification at the polls, while 14 states and Washington, D.C., do not require any documentation to vote at the polls.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
Contrary to Garland’s stance, the Heritage Foundation highlights that voter ID laws enjoy widespread support across all demographics, with nearly 80% of voters in favor. This includes more than 60% of Democrats, 64% of black voters, 77% of Hispanics, and 76% of low-income voters, according to a poll conducted by the Honest Elections Project.
How did Attorney General Garland highlight the historical injustices and denial of voting rights to black people in his speech?
F March 7, Attorney General Merrick Garland denounced voter ID requirements as discriminatory and unnecessary. In his impassioned speech delivered at the Tabernacle Baptist Church in Selma, Alabama, Garland commemorated the 59th anniversary of the brutal attack on civil rights demonstrators by Selma police officers, shedding light on the ongoing struggle for voting rights.
Garland vehemently argued against the implementation of voter ID requirements by states, labeling them as discriminatory, burdensome, and unnecessary. He emphasized that the right of all eligible citizens to vote and have their votes counted is not something that should be up for debate. However, he did not explicitly define what he meant by “eligible,” leaving room for interpretation.
Drawing attention to historical injustices and the denial of voting rights to black people, Garland highlighted recent court decisions that have weakened the protections of the Voting Rights Act. This landmark legislation, which the marchers on the Edmund Pettus Bridge fought for 59 years ago, has faced significant challenges in recent years. Garland expressed concern over a surge in legislative measures that make it increasingly difficult for millions of eligible voters to cast their ballots and exercise their right to choose their representatives.
“The right to vote is still under attack,” Garland proclaimed, asserting the Justice Department’s commitment to fight against these encroachments. While he did not provide specific details regarding the strategies or actions the department plans to undertake, his strong denouncement of voter ID requirements serves as an important statement of intent.
Many critics argue that voter ID requirements disproportionately affect minority and marginalized communities, who may face challenges in accessing the necessary identification. They claim that such requirements act as barriers to voting, effectively suppressing the voices of those already facing systemic disadvantages.
In response to these concerns, Garland’s remarks emphasize his dedication to protecting voting rights and combating discrimination. By denouncing voter ID requirements, he signals his support for robust and inclusive participation in the democratic process.
The Attorney General’s speech in Selma comes at a crucial time, as many states are considering or passing legislation that imposes voter ID requirements. Advocates for voting rights and civil liberties will undoubtedly welcome Garland’s forceful stance on this issue, seeing it as a step toward safeguarding democratic principles and ensuring equal access to the ballot box.
While Garland’s remarks indicate a shift in the Justice Department’s approach to voting rights, the battle to protect and expand these fundamental rights is far from over. Proponents of voter ID requirements argue that such measures are necessary to prevent voter fraud and ensure the integrity of elections. They contend that identification is a reasonable and essential requirement to uphold the credibility of the democratic process.
As the debate on voter ID requirements continues, it remains to be seen how Garland’s denouncement will influence future policies and legal battles surrounding voting rights. Nonetheless, his speech serves as a public statement of the Justice Department’s commitment to safeguarding the right to vote and addressing ongoing discrimination within the electoral system.
In commemorating the historical struggle for voting rights in Selma, Attorney General Merrick Garland firmly asserted that voter ID requirements are discriminatory and unnecessary. His speech reflects the determination of the Justice Department to protect democratic values and create a more inclusive society by ensuring equal access to the ballot box.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...