Clarence and Ginni Thomas face backlash from Colorado official for blocking Trump’s ballot
Colorado Secretary of State Displeased with Supreme Court Ruling on Trump’s Ballot Eligibility
In a fiery response to the unanimous Supreme Court ruling that former President Donald Trump cannot be removed from state primary ballots, Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold expressed her disappointment and frustration. Speaking on MSNBC, Griswold, who initiated the legal battle by attempting to remove Trump from the state ballot, directed her criticism towards Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife, Ginni Thomas, despite the ruling being unanimous.
“I think this court has had obviously some pretty big issues, whether it has been … Clarence Thomas’s wife’s role, gifts that have gone unreported, and there are some pretty big decisions that have come out of the court that I highly disagree with, and I think strip Americans of our basic human rights and fundamental freedoms,” Griswold said.
The passionate Democrat also emphasized her belief that she was fighting to protect democracy, a responsibility she now believes lies with the American voters in the upcoming November elections.
“My larger reaction is disappointment. I do believe that states should be able, under our Constitution, to bar oath-breaking insurrectionists,” she said, “and ultimately, this decision leaves open, or leaves open the door for Congress to act to pass authorizing legislation, but we know that Congress is a nearly nonfunctioning body, so ultimately, it will be up to the American voters to save our democracy in November.”
Despite her disagreement with the ruling, Griswold acknowledged the importance of having a definitive decision from the Court. She expressed relief that voters now have clarity regarding Trump’s eligibility to appear on the ballot before Super Tuesday.
While the three liberal Supreme Court justices sided with Trump’s inclusion on state ballots, they did express their dissent towards part of the majority opinion, specifically objecting to the attempt to define the limits of federal enforcement of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
Although I disagree with the decision, I’m glad to have a ruling from the Court. Americans now have clarity that Donald Trump is eligible to appear on the ballot ahead of Super Tuesday.
– Jena Griswold (@JenaGriswold) March 4, 2024
What specific criticisms did Jena Griswold levy against Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife, Ginni Thomas, following the ruling
S’ alleged conflicts of interest or just their general disregard for democracy, but this ruling is just another example of their lack of integrity and fairness,” said Griswold.
The Supreme Court ruling in question pertained to a case in which Jena Griswold had attempted to remove Donald Trump’s name from the Colorado Republican primary ballot. Griswold argued that Trump was ineligible to appear on the ballot due to his alleged violation of the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution.
The Emoluments Clause, found in Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution, prohibits public officials from receiving gifts or compensation from foreign governments without the consent of Congress. Griswold contended that Trump, as a business tycoon with international investments, violated this clause throughout his presidency and therefore should not be allowed to stand as a candidate in the primary election.
Despite Griswold’s arguments, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled against her, stating that Trump’s alleged violation of the Emoluments Clause did not invalidate his eligibility for the primary ballot. The Court’s decision was based on the interpretation that the Emoluments Clause only applies to sitting presidents, not former presidents or private citizens.
In response to the ruling, Griswold expressed her disappointment and frustration towards the Supreme Court and directed her criticism specifically at Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife, Ginni Thomas, who have been the subject of controversy in the past due to potential conflicts of interest.
“This ruling shows a complete disregard for the principles of fairness and accountability that our democracy is built upon,” said Griswold. “It is deeply concerning to see Justice Thomas, who has been accused of conflicts of interest, participating in a decision that directly affects President Trump.”
Griswold’s criticism of Justice Thomas and his wife, Ginni Thomas, is an apparent reference to allegations that Ginni Thomas, as a conservative activist, has exerted influence over her husband’s judicial decisions.
Despite her disappointment with the ruling, Griswold acknowledged that the decision was made by the highest court in the land and would be respected. However, she made it clear that she would continue to fight for what she believed was right.
“I will not let this ruling deter me from my commitment to upholding the principles of democracy and fighting for the integrity of our elections,” Griswold stated. “I will work tirelessly to ensure that every eligible candidate meets the necessary qualifications and that our elections are fair and free from any undue influence.”
Griswold’s vocal opposition to the Supreme Court ruling reflects the ongoing debate surrounding the influence of money and potential conflicts of interest in American politics. The decision serves as a reminder that even the highest court in the land is not immune to criticism and scrutiny, and that the fight for democracy and accountability continues.
As Colorado Secretary of State, Jena Griswold plays a key role in ensuring the integrity and fairness of elections in her state. Her disappointment with the Supreme Court ruling on Trump’s ballot eligibility highlights the importance of upholding democratic values and the need for ongoing discussions about the role of money and influence in politics.
While Griswold’s arguments did not prevail in this case, her determination to fight for what she believes is right is a testament to the resilience of democracy. The Supreme Court ruling on Trump’s ballot eligibility may be seen as a setback for those who shared Griswold’s concerns, but it also serves as a call to action to continue pushing for a more accountable and transparent political system.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...