2024 State of the Union: Biden highlights ‘shrinkflation’—essential details
Shrinkflation: The Battle Against Corporate Greed
“Shrinkflation” has become the buzzword for the Biden administration as they prepare for the president’s annual State of the Union address. This clever term, a combination of “shrink” and “inflation,” has gained popularity among liberal lawmakers in the Democratic Party who accuse corporations of cheating consumers by reducing product sizes while keeping prices the same.
Interestingly, the Biden administration has recently adopted this line of thinking, possibly as a way to shift blame for the past few years of inflation onto corporations rather than their own economic policies. However, Republicans argue that excessive spending by the administration, along with Federal Reserve monetary policy during the pandemic, is the main culprit.
But “shrinkflation” is not just a partisan issue. It is a real phenomenon that is part of the broader COVID inflation, according to Ryan Young, a senior economist at the libertarian Competitive Enterprise Institute. This concept is already factored into official inflation statistics, such as the consumer price index.
Biden himself has taken a stand against shrinkflation, posting a video ad on social media calling on big consumer brands to stop this practice. The phrase has gained traction, with increased Google searches for shrinkflation and even a mention on Sesame Street.
During an event at the White House, Biden discussed shrinkflation in terms of Sesame Street, highlighting how even Cookie Monster noticed his cookies getting smaller while the price remained the same. This unexpected connection between a popular children’s show and U.S. economic policy sparked controversy and criticism.
As Biden faces a tough reelection challenge, his focus on shrinkflation may be an attempt to deflect blame for the high inflation rates that have made life more unaffordable for consumers. Despite other positive economic trends, such as strong output and job growth, Biden’s approval ratings have not seen a significant boost.
It is likely that Biden will address corporate greed and shrinkflation during his State of the Union address, aligning himself with more liberal Democrats like Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders who have been vocal about this issue. Warren, for example, released a video targeting big corporations like Doritos, Oreos, and even toilet paper for shrinking product sizes while maintaining or increasing prices.
As the White House team and Biden’s campaign work to highlight the positive aspects of the economy, such as low unemployment, they hope to gain support for Biden’s economic policies, which they have dubbed “Bidenomics.” However, recent polling shows that a majority of voters disapprove of Biden’s job performance and his handling of the economy.
How does shrinkflation allow corporations to increase their profits without raising prices?
A broader pattern of corporate greed that has been affecting consumers for decades. Corporations have been using various tactics to increase their profits at the expense of consumers, and shrinkflation is just one of them.
Shrinkflation refers to the practice of reducing the size or quantity of a product while keeping the price the same. This allows companies to maintain their profit margins without explicitly raising prices. For example, a bag of chips that used to contain 200 grams may now only have 180 grams, but the price remains unchanged. Consumers are effectively paying the same amount for less product.
This deceptive tactic has become increasingly common across various industries, from food and beverages to personal care products and household items. It is a subtle way for companies to increase their profits without attracting too much attention from consumers.
What makes shrinkflation particularly troubling is that it often goes unnoticed by consumers. Most people are not meticulously checking the weight or quantity of every product they buy, and companies take advantage of this. They bank on the fact that consumers will assume the price is fair, not realizing that they are getting less value for their money.
Furthermore, shrinkflation disproportionately affects low-income consumers who are more price-sensitive and rely on certain products for their everyday needs. When the size of essential items, such as diapers or toiletries, shrinks without a corresponding decrease in price, it can have a significant impact on a household’s budget.
The battle against shrinkflation requires both consumer awareness and government intervention. As consumers, we must become more vigilant and informed about the products we purchase. By scrutinizing labels, checking weights, and comparing prices per unit, we can hold corporations accountable and make more informed choices.
However, individual consumer actions can only go so far. Government regulations and oversight are necessary to ensure that companies are not engaging in deceptive practices that harm consumers. This includes enforcing clear labeling laws and monitoring price changes relative to the size or quantity of products.
Some countries have already taken steps to combat shrinkflation. For instance, the United Kingdom’s Office for National Statistics has been monitoring package sizes and ensuring that consumers are not misled by deceptive practices. Other countries should follow suit and implement similar measures to protect consumers from corporate greed.
Shrinkflation is more than just a catchy buzzword. It reflects a real problem of corporate greed and deceptive practices that undermine consumer trust and affordability. By addressing shrinkflation and holding corporations accountable, we can create a fairer marketplace that benefits both businesses and consumers alike.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...