Democrats criticize Biden for using ‘illegal’ instead of ‘undocumented
President Biden Faces Backlash for Referring to Migrant as “Illegal” During State of the Union Address
In a surprising turn of events, President Joe Biden used the term ”illegal” to describe an undocumented migrant during his recent State of the Union address. This unexpected choice of words has sparked criticism from members of his own political party.
During his speech, Biden mentioned the tragic murder of Laken Riley, a 22-year-old nursing student at the University of Georgia, allegedly committed by a Venezuelan national who had entered the United States illegally. In response to heckling from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Biden made the off-script remark, saying, “Lincoln [sic] Riley, an innocent young woman who was killed by an illegal. That’s right.”
The President’s use of the term “illegal” quickly drew condemnation from fellow Democrats. Rep. Ilhan Omar stated, “No human being is illegal,” while Rep. Chuy Garcia expressed his disappointment as an immigrant himself, saying he was “extremely disappointed to hear President Biden use the word ‘illegal.'”
Rep. Joaquin Castro described Biden’s remark as “dangerous rhetoric,” but refrained from directly blaming the President, suggesting that he may be receiving misguided advice from his advisors and speechwriters. Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a staunch supporter of Biden, suggested that he should have used the term “undocumented,” although she downplayed the significance of the issue.
The National Immigrant Justice Center criticized Biden’s choice of words, accusing him of echoing the sentiments of anti-immigrant extremists. They argued that using personal tragedies for political gain and associating immigration status with criminality is both racist and dehumanizing.
Interestingly, Biden’s remark contradicts his own administration’s stance on inclusive language. In 2021, his administration urged Department of Homeland Security officials to avoid terms like “illegal alien” and instead use phrases like “undocumented individual” or “undocumented noncitizen.” This shift was seen as a symbolic change to promote a more humane approach towards undocumented immigrants.
How does the use of the term “illegal” perpetuate negative stereotypes and hinder progress towards more humane immigration policies
Party, as well as immigration activists and advocates.
The backlash began immediately after President Biden’s speech, when many took to social media to express their disappointment and frustration with his language. The term “illegal” is seen by many as dehumanizing and stigmatizing, particularly when used in the context of immigration. It reinforces negative stereotypes and perpetuates a narrative that frames migrants as criminals.
President Biden’s use of the term is particularly surprising considering his previous commitment to using more inclusive and respectful language when discussing immigration. Throughout his campaign, he emphasized the importance of treating immigrants with dignity and respect, promising to overturn the hardline policies of the previous administration.
This incident has raised questions about the sincerity of President Biden’s commitment to immigration reform. Critics argue that his use of the term “illegal” undermines the efforts of activists and advocates who have long fought for more humane and just immigration policies. They argue that if the President himself is unable to use respectful language, how can we expect real change to occur?
Furthermore, the use of the term “illegal” is factually incorrect and misleading. Seeking asylum or migrating without proper documentation is not a crime under international law. It is a civil violation. By using the term “illegal,” President Biden perpetuates a misleading and inaccurate narrative that feeds into the demonization of migrants.
Immigration activists and advocates have been calling for a shift in the narrative surrounding migration, urging politicians and the media to use more accurate and compassionate language. They argue that labels like “illegal” only serve to dehumanize and marginalize migrants, making it easier for harmful policies to be implemented.
President Biden’s use of the term ”illegal” during his State of the Union address undermines his credibility and sends a concerning message about his commitment to immigration reform. It is disheartening to see the President of the United States employing language that contributes to the harmful narrative surrounding migration.
It is important for leaders to recognize the power of their words and to use language that promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion. By referring to migrants as “illegal,” President Biden fails to live up to the standard he set for his administration and raises doubts about his ability to bring about meaningful change.
The criticism President Biden is facing for his use of the term “illegal” highlights the urgent need for a shift in the discourse surrounding immigration. It is time for politicians, media outlets, and society at large to recognize the humanity and dignity of migrants and to advocate for policies that reflect these values.
As President Biden continues to face criticism for his choice of words, it is crucial for him to listen to the concerns of immigration activists and advocates. Addressing their concerns and committing to more compassionate and accurate language is an essential step towards rebuilding trust and advancing meaningful immigration reform.
It is our hope that President Biden will reflect on the backlash he has received and take this opportunity to reevaluate his language and approach towards immigration. The United States has a long history of welcoming immigrants and providing opportunities for those seeking a better life. It is imperative that our leaders lead with empathy and compassion and work towards creating an inclusive and just society for all.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...