Biden’s defense budget is tailored for a different reality
Is Biden’s Defense Budget Sufficient for Today’s Global Challenges?
When it comes to rhetoric, President Joe Biden is clear about the importance of U.S. influence and protection across the globe. However, his proposed 2025 defense budget paints a different picture, suggesting a reluctance to back ambitious words with the necessary funds.
The president has vowed to “defend every inch of NATO territory” in the face of Russian hostilities and maintains an “ironclad” defense commitment to the Philippines amidst Chinese aggression. Moreover, Biden has not shied away from promising military aid to Taiwan if China poses a direct threat.
Biden’s Military Promises vs. Global Insecurities
Biden’s military promises to global allies reflect the world’s increasing insecurities. The defense “to-do list” is growing: from ongoing conflict in Israel and Iran’s proxy attacks to threats from North Korea and unforeseen crises like Haiti’s collapse. Military readiness is crucial, yet it hinges on sustained strategic investment—which the current defense budget seemingly fails to address.
Seeking answers, we must ask: does Biden’s $850 billion budget for 2025 align with our security needs?
Breaking Down the Numbers
The budget appears ample at first glance but accounts for less than a 1% increase from the previous year, which doesn’t even keep pace with inflation. As a result, in real terms, the budget spells a cut, further constrained by a 4.5% Defense Department pay raise.
Contrast this with China’s 7.2% hike in its defense expenditure, and the disparity becomes stark. Biden’s budget necessitates drastic reductions in essential areas, particularly in our naval capabilities.
The Consequences of Insufficient Funding
The most jarring outcome is halving our U.S. attack submarine orders—a decision that’s short-sighted given our strategic needs in the Pacific. A more robust initiative would streamline funds into developing our shipbuilding industry, enhancing our capacity to construct not just submarines, but also destroyers and other critical vessels.
Similarly, investment in long-range missiles is a fraction of what’s required. Given the escalating tensions with China, these platforms are not merely assets but necessities for potential conflict outcomes. Our own military officials acknowledge a preparedness gap—a war with China, as it stands, is not something we’re ready for.
Sensible Reductions?
Some proposed cutbacks do make sense; the decommissioning of underperforming littoral combat ships and reprioritizing funds toward naval and aerial forces over the Army echo strategic foresight. Similarly, scaling back on F-35 jet orders might be prudent given the program’s troubled history. Postponing an aircraft carrier order could reflect a shift in modern warfare, considering the rise of AI, space technology, and hypersonic weaponry.
Yet, in an uncertain world, such savings must not result in a lesser budget but reallocated to critical defense programs and R&D to outpace our adversaries.
Meeting Future Security Demands
The Pentagon’s budgetary execution needs refinement, but the bottom line is that the budget itself must be prepared for the immediate and distant future—a future teeming with proliferating threats across warfighting domains and continents.
While Europe’s allies indeed need to ramp up their defense efforts against Russia, the U.S. must also hasten its readiness to potentially face concurrent wars with both Russia and China, countries which may align against us in conflict.
This budget proposal does not instill confidence in that readiness. It might be a difficult pill for Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and the Pentagon to swallow, given the political dynamics. In the end, it points to a disconnect, showcasing a Biden budget that veers away from the stark landscape of geopolitical risk and the heavy mantle of leadership.
A Closer Look at the Implications
As global events evolve rapidly and threats to security grow in complexity, it’s critical that the United States reassesses and adjusts its fiscal priorities in defense. The 2025 budget request will be a decisive factor in maintaining our hallowed role as a global peacekeeping force. To underfund is to undermine our position and our promises—something that the world, and history, may not judge kindly.
For a deeper analysis, you might want to explore further insights from experts on the implications of the defense budget shortfall.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
