Nathan Wade Resigns as Special Prosecutor in Trump Georgia Inquiry After Judicial Decision
A Twist in the Georgia Election Case: Special Prosecutor Steps Down
In a dramatic shift within the high-stakes Georgia election interference investigation, Donald Trump‘s legal saga saw an unexpected turn – Special prosecutor Nathan Wade tendered his resignation.
The legal chessboard was reset when the Fulton County District Attorney’s Office admitted Wade’s departure, post a crucial decree by Judge Scott McAfee. Only hours before, the judge had established a stark choice: either Wade or DA Fani Willis had to withdraw from the case against Trump, accused of undue influence in the 2020 election proceedings. The ruling surfaced amid contentions that DA Willis could be removed over allegations of fiscal misuse and preferential treatment towards Wade.
Behind the Bench: The Judge’s Decision
Judge McAfee pointed out what he termed a “tremendous lapse in judgment” on the DA’s part, discerning an “impropriety’s appearance,” yet underscored the defense’s failure to provide substantial evidence of a conflict of interest linked to Willis and Wade’s connection.
“Although the court found that ‘the defendants failed to meet their burden of proving that the District Attorney acquired an actual conflict of interest,’ I am offering my resignation in the interest of democracy, in dedication to the American public, and move this case forward as quickly as possible,” Wade stated, signalling his commitment to the integrity of the judicial process as reported by WSB-TV.
Welcoming Wade’s noble exit, Willis expressed heartfelt sentiments, underscoring his valor in confronting the profound allegations enveloping the defendants—allegations that suggested a conspiracy to unravel Georgia’s 2020 presidential election results.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
Personal Intrigue and Professional Ethics
The plot thickened with co-defendant Mike Roman’s accusations hinting at a romantic entanglement between Willis and Wade coinciding with Wade’s hiring for the Trump inquiry. Contradictory testimonies have surfaced, including one attesting that the duo’s romantic ties predate the case, a statement that directly opposes Willis and Wade’s claim of a relationship’s start in 2022.
A former associate from the DA’s office added another layer to the complexity, asserting that Willis and Wade commenced their relationship in 2019. This contested both their accounts firmly placing the initiation of their personal ties well into 2022.
In light of Judge McAfee’s verdict, noted legal scholar from George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley dispensed a striking metaphor, critiquing the outcome: “It’s like finding two people in a bank vault and taking one off to jail.” A reflection on the singularity of the court’s choice to remove only one participant from the legal process.
Leif Le Mahieu contributed to this article.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...