Biden’s latest electric vehicle mandate poses challenges for consumers, automakers, and environmental goals
Spring’s Chill: Tesla Owners Stranded
Recall a frosty January where Tesla owners found themselves stranded as their electric vehicle batteries succumbed to subzero temperatures, with charging stations failing. One driver lamented, ”I’ve waited over five hours without a charge.”
Let’s go, Brandon!
The EV Mandate Debate
As spring unfolds, the Biden administration introduces strict emissions regulations critiqued as an undercover “electrical vehicle mandate.” In a bid to cut carbon emissions drastically by 2032, opinions on the mandate range from ambitious to insane, with concerns over increased unpopular EV usage.
- Daren Bakst, from the Competitive Enterprise Institute’s Center on Energy and Environment, criticizes the extreme nature of the rule, impacting Americans’ vehicle choices and personal freedoms.
Consumer Sentiment
Despite the push for EVs, a recent poll revealed that a majority of Americans are hesitant to embrace electric vehicles, signaling a disconnect between policy goals and consumer preferences. Automakers like Ford and GM have responded by halting production of some electric models due to tepid demand.
Rental giant Hertz faced repercussions from its EV-heavy strategy, with its CEO resigning after a sharp decline in EV demand impacted the company’s bottom line.
The EV Conundrum: Demand Drops and Losses Soar
Citing lackluster demand, costly depreciation, and expensive repairs, the Estero, Florida-based company faced a significant setback, taking a $245 million charge and marking its most substantial quarterly loss since the pandemic.
Unveiling Hypocrisy in the Auto Sector
In a game of corporate media hypocrisy bingo, Axios revealed the CEO of the automaker overseeing Chrysler, Dodge, and Jeep warning about a potential EV “bloodbath” if pricing wars persist. Unlike former President Donald Trump, Carlos Tavares of Stellantis used the term “bloodbath” without facing media backlash.
- Reality Ignored: Despite plunging EV demand and financial struggles among automakers, the Biden administration remains unwavering in its push for EV adoption.
You will buy an EV and like it, the White House’s firm directive echoes.
A Political Maneuver
Seeking support from the automaker union vote, particularly in swing states like Michigan, Biden’s EPA is easing the implementation of the rule and integrating more hybrids into the transition campaign. Despite political moves, Trump maintains a lead over Biden in Michigan, possibly fueled by discontent with Biden’s policies in manufacturing-reliant Michigan.
Challenging Perception
The White House asserts the new rule doesn’t favor EVs over other vehicle types, targeting two-thirds of the auto market for EV sales within eight years, while the regulation potentially trades gasoline for coal in the long run.
New York Times’ Praise: The Times lauds the administration’s climate standard, emphasizing significant carbon emission reductions and societal benefits according to the EPA, though acknowledging the vast challenges posed by the transition to electric vehicles.
File all of that under pricey and painful, and the unnecessary kind of pain that only a self-loathing masochist could love.
This push for EV mandates, driven by executive orders, reveals the Biden administration’s strategy to bypass Congress and public sentiment, raising questions on the true popularity and efficacy of EV adoption.
The Electric Vehicle Turmoil: A Prelude to Chaos
As the electric vehicle fervor intensifies, fueled by immense taxpayer subsidies, the industry is witnessing a harrowing turn of events. Layoffs, staggering financial losses, and high-profile CEO departures paint a grim picture, signaling the inception of what could be labeled as the electric vehicle bloodbath.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...