Russia accuses the U.S. of illegally expanding sea boundaries, yet Russia has a history of boundary-pushing for decades

Russia Accuses U.S. of Boundary Disputes

According to TASS, the Russian ​state-owned news agency, Russia is objecting to⁣ what it ⁢calls the United States’ “illegal attempts to unilaterally change the external boundaries of the continental shelf” ​in regions ⁢of the oceans around the world.

Russian ‌Stance‍ on Continental Shelf Disputes

In advance of the⁤ council of the ⁣International Seabed Authority meetings between ⁤March 18 and March 29, the Russian Foreign ​Ministry issued a statement accusing the U.S. of moving‍ its boundaries.

• Russia opposes the U.S.’ attempts to ⁤alter external boundaries.
• The Russian delegation challenges U.S. actions ‌beyond 200 nautical miles⁢ in ​various ocean regions.
• Russia asserts its stance through official diplomatic channels.

Legacy of Boundaries: Russia’s Arctic ⁣Claims

However, Russia itself sought an extended continental shelf in​ the Arctic Ocean, with Admiral Nikolai Yevmenov advocating for an expansion‌ beyond the 200-mile exclusive economic zone at the International Arctic Forum.

• In 2001, ‍Russia first requested U.N. approval for Arctic ‍Seabed expansion.
• Subsequent submissions in 2015 and ⁤March 2021 aimed to enlarge ⁢Russia’s continental shelf coverage.
• Russia’s claims could impact almost 70% of the⁣ Arctic Ocean and overlap with EEZs of other Arctic nations.

Complexities of Maritime Law and U.S. Stance

“We simply are not ‌persuaded that decisions ​by the International Seabed Authority and international tribunals empowered by this treaty will be more favorable to U.S. interests than bilateral negotiations…”

The 1982 Law of the⁣ Sea Convention established guidelines for navigational rights, maritime zones, and economic jurisdiction. The U.S., despite efforts, has not ratified this convention due to concerns regarding sovereignty and economic implications.

• The convention’s potential litigation exposure and sovereignty infringements are key concerns for U.S. policymakers.
• The Heritage ‍Foundation opposes ratification,⁤ highlighting issues with maritime rights,⁣ fees, and‍ environmental liabilities.

While former President Barack Obama advocated U.S. accession to maximize legal certainty and secure sovereign rights, the U.S. remains outside the convention, navigating a complex landscape of maritime disputes and international relations.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases