Washington Examiner

California Democrats engage in a dishonest competition of fast-food victors and victims

California’s decay is⁣ linked​ to corrupt governance under the Democratic Party’s single-party rule, exemplified by recent fast-food regulations. The state approved exemptions from minimum wage laws for certain locations, citing existing high-wage collective bargaining agreements. However, controversies arose over preferential‍ treatment, like the exemption for ⁢bread-selling restaurants linked to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s acquaintance, billionaire Greg Flynn.


Part of California’s decay can be attributed to the corrupt governance and legislating that comes from the Democratic Party’s single-party rule, and that continues to be on display with the state’s new fast food regulations.

California approved exemptions from its fast food minimum wage and oversight board law on Monday for locations in places including airports, arenas, and college campuses, among others. According to legislators, this is because the fast food employees at these locations already have collective bargaining agreements with higher wages and more benefits, and therefore, the law need not cover them.

But there are more juicy details about the exemptions and the process behind them. KCRA 3, the local media outlet based in Sacramento that broke the news about Panera’s possible exemption from the law (more on that later), reported that the Service Employees International Union managed to freeze out other labor groups in negotiations over the law. That reportedly included nondisclosure agreements for representatives of the fast food industry.

That brings us to the other exemption that was not just procedurally suspicious but substantively suspicious. That exemption spares restaurants from the law if they make and sell bread as a stand-alone menu item. Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-CA) is friends with billionaire Greg Flynn, whose company controls several Panera Bread restaurants throughout the state. Newsom’s administration then came out and said it “appears” Panera would not be exempt from the law under its interpretation that it reached in response to backlash.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Yet it hasn’t been made clear who that exemption does apply to and whether or not it applies to Panera. And while Flynn has said he would be raising the minimum wage to match the law, the law contains other provisions aside from wages. It is all shrouded in secrecy, with exemptions handed out to be interpreted later at the convenience of California’s administrative state — which is, of course, run by the Democrats.

Special carveouts and exemptions are how California has been run over the last decade, from COVID-19 lockdown exemptions for Hollywood to doling out exemptions to the state’s freelancing restrictions for some industries while forcing others to continue to operate under the boot. California Democrats like picking winners and losers, so long as they are doing it in backrooms out of sight of any real public accountability.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker