Trump’s Electoral College change in key state quashed, shadow loss avoided (for now)
Lawmakers in Nebraska rejected a proposal to switch to a “winner-take-all” system for awarding electoral votes. Nebraska currently assigns electoral votes by popular vote in each congressional district, with two statewide electors. Despite support for change from Gov. Jim Pillen, the state Senate voted down the proposal 36-9. Republican state Sen. Julie Slama introduced the amendment. Based on the provided web search results, here are comprehensive replies to the query regarding Nebraska lawmakers rejecting the proposal for a “winner-take-all” system for awarding electoral votes:
1. Gov. Jim Pillen & Donald Trump’s Support:
Former President Donald Trump supports Gov. Jim Pillen’s efforts to revise how Nebraska allocates electoral college votes. Trump endorses Pillen’s push for change in Nebraska’s electoral voting system, favoring a ”winner-take-all” approach. The collaboration aims to alter the existing electoral vote distribution method.
Source: [Nebraska Jim Pillen voices support of winner-take-all bill – URL](https://www.ketv.com/article/nebraska-jim-pillen-trump-support-winner-take-all-bill/60386146)
2. Legislative Decision:
Despite support from Gov. Jim Pillen, Nebraska legislators, including the state Senate, voted against the proposal to switch to a “winner-take-all” system for electoral votes. Senator Julie Slama’s introduced amendment was rejected, maintaining Nebraska’s current practice of assigning electoral votes based on popular votes in congressional districts.
Source: [Nebraska legislators buck Trump by blocking Electoral – URL](https://www.yahoo.com/news/nebraska-legislators-buck-trump-blocking-052020750.html)
I hope these details provide a clear overview of the situation surrounding Nebraska’s rejection of the proposed electoral vote system change.
Lawmakers in Nebraska rejected an attempt to change the way the state awards electoral votes to a “winner-take-all” system on Wednesday night, but the sponsor of the effort said he intends to try again before the legislative session ends.
Nebraska allocates its electoral votes based on a popular vote in each congressional district with two at-large electors who mirror the popular vote of the entire state, being the only state alongside Maine to do so. Gov. Jim Pillen (R-NE) announced his support to change the system on Tuesday, but the state Senate voted down the proposal 36-9 on Wednesday night.
Republican state Sen. Julie Slama brought the proposal to change the system via an amendment to another bill, saying she wanted to get each senator on the record on the matter.
“Given the recent interest on this issue, it’s incumbent that the NE Legislature finally take a full vote. Whether it passes or fails, we’ll get everyone on the record,” Slama said in a post on X before the vote.
Republican state Sen. Loren Lippincott, who sponsored the original bill to change the system, told the Nebraska Examiner on Wednesday that he would try to get another vote on the proposal via an amendment to LB 541 on Thursday.
The state’s legislative session ends on April 18, meaning the timetable to change the procedure before the 2024 election would have to happen quickly.
For much of the time Nebraska has had its current system in place, it has usually allocated all of its electoral votes to Republicans, but it has split its electoral votes twice. The two times came when the 2nd Congressional District, which has traditionally been a swing district, voted for Democratic candidates in 2008 and 2020.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
If the state changed to a winner-take-all system, it would likely cost President Joe Biden and give former President Donald Trump an electoral vote in the 2024 election, which is expected to be a tight contest.
The CookPoliticalReport rated Nebraska and the state’s 1st and 3rd Congressional Districts as “safe Republican” for the presidential race, while the state’s 2nd Congressional District, worth one electoral vote, is rated as “likely Democrat.”
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...