Biden Administration Admits Civilian Casualty in Air Strike Targeting Alleged Al Qaeda Leader
The Biden administration acknowledged mistakenly killing a civilian shepherd in a drone strike in Syria, rather than an Al Qaeda leader as initially claimed. Following an extensive investigation, U.S. Central Command revealed the error and the civilian casualty named Mr. Lufti Hasan Masto. The investigation involved senior officials and civilians knowledgeable about intelligence and operations. The Biden administration admitted to mistakenly targeting a civilian shepherd in a drone strike in Syria instead of the reported Al Qaeda leader. U.S. Central Command’s investigation identified Mr. Lufti Hasan Masto as the civilian casualty. The probe engaged senior officials and civilians versed in intelligence and operations.
The Biden administration admitted on Thursday that it killed a civilian shepherd in a drone strike in Syria last year instead of a “senior Al Qaeda official,” as it had initially claimed.
After a months-long investigation into a unilateral counterterrorism air strike in Northwest Syria on May 3, 2023, intended to take out a top Al Qaeda official, U.S. Central Command said in a summary of its findings that U.S. forces had mistakenly identified and taken out a civilian instead of a terrorist.
“The investigation determined U.S. forces misidentified the intended Al Qaeda target and that a civilian, Mr. Lufti Hasan Masto (Masto), was struck and killed instead,” CENTCOM said. “Many of the facts and other findings of the investigation involve classified information and cannot be shared publicly.”
CENTCOM Commander General Michael Erik Kurilla ordered an investigation into the strike on June 6, 2023, after reports that an Al Qaeda operative had not actually been killed in the strike. The investigation was conducted by U.S. Army Brigadier General John P. Cogbill and concluded on November 15, 2023.
The investigative team included ten senior service members and civilian employees not involved with the strike, but with knowledge of intelligence, armed conflicts, and targeting operations, according to CENTCOM.
CENTCOM said the team interviewed over 40 witnesses and visited locations in the United States, Iraq, and Jordan. The investigation came weeks after a Washington Post report raising questions about the strike.
While the report said that the strike did kill a civilian, it said the strike was done in accordance with both international law and U.S. Military policies.
“We are committed to learning from this incident and improving our targeting processes to mitigate potential civilian harm,” CENTCOM said. “U.S. Central Command acknowledges and regrets the civilian harm that resulted from the airstrike. We take all reports of civilian harm caused by U.S. military operations seriously and continue to employ thorough and deliberate targeting and strike processes to minimize civilian harm.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
The incident is similar to a drone strike the Biden administration made in August 2021 during President Joe Biden’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan where the administration claimed to have “conducted a self-defense unmanned over-the-horizon airstrike today on a vehicle in Kabul, eliminating an imminent ISIS-K threat to Hamid Karzai International airport.”
However, the administration admitted a couple of weeks later that the drone strike was a tragic mistake that killed 10 civilians, including seven children.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
This story is a perfect example of why the Biden administration and his traitorous henchmen at the DHS and DOJ should support President Trump’s presidential immunity question before the Supreme Court right now. Now I do realize that the killing of innocent civilians, children, shepherds, etc…don’t rise to the level of horrific crimes that former President Trump faces currently, like Presidential document authority issues or hush money payments to a lying skank years ago, but…