Trump’s hush money trial may conclude next week
The judge in Donald Trump’s hush money trial announced that closing arguments could start next week, indicating a potential swift resolution. If the schedule holds, a verdict on alleged business record falsification may arrive by the following week. The trial, initially expected to last weeks, is likely to conclude sooner. Trump’s attorney plans to wrap up cross-examination by Monday. The judge presiding over Donald Trump’s hush money trial has disclosed that closing arguments may commence next week, hinting at a possible expedited conclusion. If the timeline remains intact, a decision regarding the alleged falsification of business records could be reached the week after. Originally forecasted to be much longer, the trial is now on track for an earlier resolution, with Trump’s lawyer aiming to conclude cross-examination by Monday.
A judge on Thursday said attorneys could begin delivering closing arguments in former President Donald Trump‘s hush money trial as early as Tuesday, clearing the way for the jury to begin deliberating on Trump’s fate by the end of the week.
The schedule, if it holds, would mean a verdict on whether Trump falsified business records could also come by the end of next week, but jury deliberations could stretch for days if needed.
Judge Juan Merchan initially estimated that the trial, which began April 15, would last six to eight weeks, putting it on track to end slightly ahead of schedule.
Trump’s attorney Todd Blanche said when court proceedings ended on Thursday that he planned to conclude his cross-examination of the prosecution’s final witness, Michael Cohen, by Monday morning, according to reports from the courtroom.
From there, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s team will have an opportunity to ask Cohen follow-up questions, and then the trial will flip to the defense to present its side of the case. Blanche indicated that Trump’s team might only call one witness to the stand, former Federal Election Commission Chairman Bradley Smith.
Smith is expected to speak about campaign finance laws, as Trump is facing allegations that he conspired to violate those laws by paying hush money to porn star Stormy Daniels ahead of the 2016 presidential election. Merchan has severely limited Smith to talking only in general terms and not specifically about Trump.
Trump has not testified, and Blanche said he is unsure whether Trump will take the stand next week.
While the former president said several times ahead of his trial that he planned to testify, a decision by Merchan to permit prosecutors to question Trump about some of his unrelated legal troubles, including that he was found liable for business fraud in an unrelated trial, presented a dilemma for Trump.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
Trump is facing 34 counts of falsifying business records to conceal the payment to Daniels, though prosecutors have struggled throughout the case to demonstrate that Trump had detailed knowledge of the process of paying Daniels. Evidence has shown that Cohen made the payment and that former Trump Organization Chief Financial Officer Allen Weisselberg oversaw the bookkeeping elements of it.
Before jury deliberations, Merchan will instruct the jury on how to assess the charges, and from there, jurors must reach a unanimous decision. If they cannot, Merchan would declare a mistrial.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...