Couples File Lawsuit After Removal from State Foster Care Program Due to Christian Beliefs
Two Christian couples in Vermont are suing state officials because they claim they were denied renewal of their foster care licenses due to their religious beliefs. Brian and Kaitlyn Wuoti, and Michael and Rebecca Gantt, are represented by the Alliance Defending Center and allege that the Vermont Department of Children and Families (DCF) violated their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights by requiring them to comply with DCF Policy 76, which involves supporting and affirming LGBTQ children and youth in matters such as sexual orientation and gender identity. The couples believe this policy forces them to go against their beliefs about sexual ethics and human anatomy. Aryka Radke, a DCF official, defended the department’s stance by emphasizing the importance of valuing and supporting all children irrespective of their sexual orientation or gender identity. The case raises significant First Amendment concerns, mirroring aspects of the 2021 Supreme Court case Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, which dealt with similar issues of religious freedom and discrimination. This lawsuit not only highlights the ongoing legal battles over religious freedom and LGBTQ rights but also underscores the societal and legal challenges facing religious individuals in the foster care and adoption process.
By Anthony Altomari June 15, 2024 at 7:19am
Two Christian couples are suing Vermont state officials over being booted from the foster care program over their Christian beliefs.
The couples, Brian and Kaitlyn Wuoti and Michael and Rebecca Gantt, complained in the suit that the state violated their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights.
According to a complaint filed in federal court on June 4, they alleged that the Vermont Department of Children and Families refused to renew their foster care licenses because they opposed the DCF’s policy regarding sexual orientation and gender identity.
The complaint is chiefly concerned with the application of DCF Policy 76 – “Supporting and Affirming LGBTQ Children & Youth.”
“Policy 76 provides internal guidance for Department staff on placing children who express an LGBT identity, and training foster families on how to support the child’s sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression,” the complaint said.
The court documents said DCF policies require foster parents to “support children in wearing hairstyles, clothing, and accessories affirming of the child’s racial, cultural, tribal, religious, or gender identity.”
The complaint alleged that the Wuotis’ license was denied solely “based on their statements explaining their religious beliefs about the human body and sexual ethics.”
DCF also apparently issued a letter to the Gantts explaining that their license was denied due to their “stance regarding the requirement for affirming care and the fact that they could not envision any education or intervention that may help to shift [their] perspectives.”
Should these families be allowed to adopt and foster?
Johannes Widmalm-Delphonse, an attorney with Alliance Defending Freedom, is representing the couples. He told the Christian Post that he believes Vermont’s policy violates his clients’ constitutional rights.
“The Supreme Court has said for decades that states can’t force citizens to say something that they don’t believe as a condition of receiving a license or any kind of government benefit,” he said.
EXCLUSIVE: Two Christian families are suing the Vermont Department for Children & Families, represented by @ADFLegal, accusing the state of blocking them from fostering due to their religious views on gender.
They speak out first to @DailySignal: pic.twitter.com/J2o9K5tm2b
— Mary Margaret Olohan (@MaryMargOlohan) June 4, 2024
“And here, Vermont is telling the parents that they have to violate their sincerely-held religious beliefs just to serve alongside others and to help vulnerable children.”
Aryka Radke, deputy commissioner of the DCF’s Family Services Division and one of the named defendants in the complaint, spoke in defense of DCF’s decision to deny the license renewals.
“It is a human right for all to be valued and supported, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity,” Radke said. “The Family Services Division is here to serve all, and upholds that expectation for both its staff, as well as the foster parents who agree to take on the care of the youth in our custody.”
Radke also argued that the timing of the suit wasn’t a coincidence.
“It bears mentioning that this suit was filed at the start of pride month — a time when we reflect on the achievements and continued struggles of the LGBTQI+ movement. The department stands in partnership with the community, and continually works to be a better partner, ally, and support system — rather than a barrier to the children and youth who identify as part of this community.”
The couples have demonstrated profound courage in refusing to compromise their beliefs.
It’s disheartening that these people are apparently being singled out solely for their religious beliefs.
The DCF’s actions demonstrate how our society has an ever-growing negative perception of religion.
Moreover, in addition to its societal impact, this case could have important implications when it comes to First Amendment jurisprudence.
It’s worth noting that this situation bears resemblance to Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, a case that was before the Supreme Court in 2021.
In a unanimous decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Supreme Court ruled that Philadelphia’s refusal to enter into a foster care contract with Catholic Social Services based on their beliefs on sexual orientation and gender ideology violated CSS’s First Amendment rights.
The Supreme Court held that the city failed to act in a neutral and generally applicable manner, which is the standard the government must satisfy if laws that burden religion are to survive a First Amendment challenge.
Roberts noted that “a law is not generally applicable if it invites the government to consider the particular reasons for a person’s conduct by creating a mechanism for individualized exemptions.”
“Government fails to act neutrally when it proceeds in a manner intolerant of religious beliefs or restricts practices because of their religious nature,” Roberts wrote.
The Supreme Court has been trending toward expanding First Amendment protections over the past few years. Based on this trajectory, and the similarities with Fulton, the couples should have confidence in their chances at success.
Whatever the result, this case could have a profound effect on religious freedom in America.
A Note from Our Deputy Managing Editor:
“We don’t even know if an election will be held in 2024.” Those 12 words have been stuck in my head since I first read them.
Former Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn recently made that comment to Floyd Brown, founder of The Western Journal.
And if the leftists and the elites get their way, that’s exactly what will happen — no real election, no real choice for the Electoral College, and no real say for the American people.
The Western Journal is fighting to keep that from happening, but we can’t do it alone.
We work tirelessly to expose the lying leftist media and the corrupt America-hating elites.
But Big Tech’s stranglehold is now so tight that without help from you, we will not be able to continue the fight.
The 2024 election is literally the most important election for every living American. We have to unite and fight for our country, otherwise we will lose it. And if we lose the America we love in 2024, we’ll lose it for good. Can we count on you to help?
With you we will be able to field journalists, do more investigative work, expose more corruption, and get desperately needed truth to millions of Americans.
We can do this only with your help. Please don’t wait one minute. Donate right now.
Thank you for reading,
Josh Manning
Deputy Managing Editor
P.S. Please stand with us today.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Physician's Choice Probiotics 60 Billion CFU - 10 Strains + Organic Prebiotics - Immune, Digestive & Gut Health - Supports Occasional Constipation, Diarrhea, Gas & Bloating - for Women & Men - 30ct
Pure Encapsulations Magnesium (Glycinate) - Supplement to Support Stress Relief, Sleep, Heart Health, Nerves, Muscles, and Metabolism* - with Magnesium Glycinate - 90 Capsules