House GOP looks to slash funding for Jack Smith in DOJ spending bill – Washington Examiner

The House is set to consider several annual spending bills as lawmakers return to Washington this week, including proposals to slash the salaries of top Biden administration officials and defund special counsel Jack Smith’s prosecutions against former President Donald Trump.

Lawmakers are expected to vote on three of their must-pass appropriations bills to fund the departments of Defense and Homeland Security, as well as state and foreign operations. The House Appropriations Committee will also continue its markups for other spending bills that will come to the floor later this summer, including the Commerce, Justice, and Science appropriations bills that allocate funding for agencies such as the Justice Department.

The final bill, in particular, has attracted attention as lawmakers look to include a measure that would defund DOJ special counsel Jack Smith’s prosecutions against Trump. The provision has been repeatedly requested by some of Trump’s top allies in the House, including Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA).

Jordan has also made funding requests for fiscal 2025 to include cuts for “politicized prosecutions from state and local prosecutors engaged in lawfare,” specifically naming Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis in Georgia, and New York Attorney General Letitia James, each of whom has opened cases against Trump.

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) has indicated the House GOP will “rein in the abuses” of Smith’s office, arguing its prosecutions relating to Trump’s handling of classified documents and attempts to overturn the 2020 election are evidence that “the judicial system in our country has been weaponized against President Trump.” Trump is running for a second term in the White House against his 2020 rival, President Joe Biden.

“These cases are coordinated political attacks, plain and simple,” Johnson told reporters last month. “They are a clear attempt to keep Donald Trump in the courtroom and off the campaign trail. That’s what this is. It’s an election interference. It is borderline criminal conspiracy, and the American people see right through it.”

House appropriators will continue marking up the DOJ spending bill, which is expected to come to the floor for a vote in mid-July.

Meanwhile, GOP leaders are looking to advance the Defense, Homeland, and SFOPS bills to the floor this week for full consideration to stay on track with their ambitious appropriations schedule unveiled earlier this year. Under that plan, lawmakers are hoping to vote on all 12 appropriations bills in June and July to have the budget completed through the House before members leave for their August recess.

However, that may be easier said than done after several hiccups in the last appropriations process, and lawmakers are in for what could become a marathon voting session this week.

There are already more than 800 amendments filed for the three appropriations bills up for consideration this week. Among those include several “culture war” amendments on immigration, abortion, environment, and diversity, equity, and inclusion — proposals that will likely cause Democrats to vote against the bills altogether.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Also among the proposed amendments are measures to slash the salaries of top Biden administration officials, including Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, and Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. The proposals would decrease their salaries to just $1.

Even if the three appropriations bills manage to make it through the House, they are unlikely to be considered by the Senate in their current form — setting the stage for a drawn-out spending fight that could extend past the election in November. Senate leaders and the White House could also seek to punt the funding deadline, Oct. 1, until after it is known who will be president in 2025 and which party will be in control of the upper chamber.