Court Docs Show Pics From Mar-A-Lago Raid Were Media Stunt
The FBI conducted a highly publicized raid on former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence, during which they reportedly used colored cover sheets to highlight certain documents in evidence photos. Journalist Julie Kelly claims that these additions were intended to emphasize the appearance of negligence in handling classified documents by Trump. These staged photos were disseminated widely across media outlets, contributing to a sensational portrayal of Trump’s actions. Additionally, court developments reveal that the prosecution admitted to mismanaging the evidence, leading Judge Aileen Cannon to postpone the criminal case indefinitely to allow for an independent document review. This delay may impact the prosecution’s ability to move forward with the trial ahead of the November election. Critics argue that the presentation and handling of these documents by the FBI were manipulative and politically motivated, aimed at damaging Trump’s reputation.
The FBI purchased glossy cover sheets to use in photos of authorities’ unprecedented raid of former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence.
On Tuesday, journalist Julie Kelly posted court documents on X showing Special Counsel Jack Smith “admitted the FBI added cover sheets to alleged classified documents found at MAL and took photos for evidence.”
“This confirms my report from last month that the FBI doctored evidence to produce stunt photos of classified documents at [Mar-a-Lago],” Kelly said.
In May, District Court Judge Aileen Cannon ordered an indefinite postponement of the criminal classified documents case against the former president to allow an independent review of the documents in the case tampered with by prosecutors. Prosecutors admitted to mishandling the evidence triggering the delay demanded by the judge which now threatens the possibility for Smith’s team to go to trial before the November election.
According to Kelly on Tuesday, the FBI’s colored cover sheets were included in “classified discovery” implicating prosecutors’ desire to keep the details of the added documents concealed from the public.
“The FBI brought colored classified cover sheets to the raid under the guise of using them to substitute classified documents found within Trump’s boxes,” Kelly wrote on X. “Instead, FBI agents attached the scary looking sheets to various files and took photos.”
The images published by prosecutors became emblematic of the former president’s apparent irresponsibility illustrated from the raid. The documents became the feature photos for sensational stories in TMZ, ABC News, Newsweek, Business Insider, Fortune, The Guardian, the Independent, USA Today, and Rolling Stone.
Several weeks after federal stormtroopers combed through Trump’s private residence, the New York Times published an apparent explainer on “How the Picture of Top Secret Folders at Mar-a-Lago Came About.”
“On Wednesday, Mr. Trump took to his social media site to say that ‘the F.B.I., during the raid of Mar-a-Lago, threw documents haphazardly all over the floor (perhaps pretending that it was me that did it!), and then started taking pictures of them for the public to see,’” the Times reported. “But the genesis of the photograph appears to be in keeping with standard protocols for how federal agents handle evidence they come across in a search.”
The image of top-secret classified documents, however, was fake news.
The paper’s reporting is the kind of defensive coverage federal prosecutors have come to expect from friendly outlets. Additional court filings show the FBI was authorized to use “deadly force” against the former president during the Mar-a-Lago search. Trump is now facing 40 charges related to the alleged mishandling of classified documents from Smith’s probe.
President Joe Biden, on the other hand, escaped felony charges over his own mishandling of classified records in February after Special Counsel Robert Hur concluded the incumbent was too senile to face a jury.
“Biden would likely present himself to the jury, as he did during our interview with him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory,” read Hur’s report. “It would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him — by then a former president well into his eighties — of a serious felony that requires a mental state of willfulness.”
Hur’s team declined to press charges despite the Biden case including multiple troves of documents discovered across multiple locations including the president’s “garage, offices, and basement den.”
In his interview with Hur’s investigation, Biden confused current events with the war in Iraq, forgot when he was vice president, and couldn’t recall correct details around his son’s 2015 death from brain cancer.
“And his memory appeared hazy when describing the Afghanistan debate that was once so important to him,” read the Hur report.
Tristan Justice is the western correspondent for The Federalist and the author of Social Justice Redux, a conservative newsletter on culture, health, and wellness. He has also written for The Washington Examiner and The Daily Signal. His work has also been featured in Real Clear Politics and Fox News. Tristan graduated from George Washington University where he majored in political science and minored in journalism. Follow him on Twitter at @JusticeTristan or contact him at [email protected]. Sign up for Tristan’s email newsletter here.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...