When It Comes To Kamala, Democracy Dies In Darkness
In the past month, American politics has seen significant upheavals, notably the departure of President Joe Biden from the 2024 presidential race due to concerns over his physical and mental state. Despite this major event, he has not provided clarity on his decision or addressed how he can continue to serve as president if he is unfit for campaigning. The media has been criticized for failing to investigate or question this situation adequately.
Meanwhile, Vice President Kamala Harris has also avoided engaging with the press or clarifying her political positions despite being positioned as the new presidential candidate for the Democrats. Her last significant media interaction was months ago, despite calls for her to provide transparency regarding her record. In contrast, former President Donald Trump has been actively participating in interviews, even with challenging media outlets.
The article suggests that the lack of accountability and transparent communication from both Biden and Harris reflects poorly on the current media landscape, which seems to enable their avoidance of hard questions. The author argues that a functioning democracy would demand clear dialogue and transparency from its leaders, especially during such tumultuous times.
The past month has likely been the most eventful in American political history. Yet the two top officials of the most powerful nation in the world won’t answer any genuine questions.
Three weeks have passed since Joe Biden was pushed out of the 2024 presidential race over deteriorating physical and mental abilities, and he has yet to publicly clarify with any specificity why he took this unprecedented step — or why, if he’s incapable of campaigning for the presidency, he’s fit to serve out his term in the White House.
Then again, not one journalist in the corporate or legacy media has explained how Biden’s obvious senility could turn from a democracy-corroding MAGA misinformation operation into an accepted reality in a single day.
If they were fooled for three years, how can we trust them? If they weren’t fooled, and they didn’t tell us, how can we trust them?
Well, we can’t. Because they’re back at it.
The Democrats’ new presidential candidate, who’s never won a single primary vote, might have been crowned but hasn’t given a real interview or even an extemporaneous political statement since Democrat bigwigs pushed Biden aside. In a functioning liberal republic, this would be pretty big news.
The last time the vice president of the United States sat down with any media was June 24, when she was interviewed by the sycophants on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” Before that was the “Momala” Harris interview with Drew Barrymore, which might be the most cringe-worthy display of fawning in recorded history.
“What is the incentive for her [to take more questions]?” a person close to Harris’ campaign told Politico recently. “She’s getting out exactly the message she wants to get out.”
Indeed, it’s quite the paradox. The media continue to baby Kamala and get her message out to the public, so Kamala doesn’t feel the least bit of urgency in clarifying her record.
If they were so inclined, the naval-gazing media could probably get Kamala out of her shell by doing some honest, deep dives into her history and positions. If her lack of transparency were a daily top-of-the-fold story she would be compelled to speak.
Say what you will about Donald Trump, but he’s done scores of interviews and pressers over the past few months, many of them with antagonistic venues — including taking questions at the National Association of Black Journalists convention just weeks after surviving an assassination attempt.
Kamala hasn’t spoken to a hostile outlet in years. She won’t even take questions from her fans.
Trump’s running mate, J.D. Vance, is compelled to answer questions about a throwaway comment he made on a podcast before he was even in the Senate. Kamala just sends her minions to walk back major policy positions that would fundamentally affect every American. She staked out these radical positions only a few years earlier while running for the same office. Kamala isn’t triangulating her views for a general election, she is effectively negating an entire political history through press releases.
Kamala, for instance, says she no longer supports banning all air travel, meat, and combustible engines. That’s nice. Kamala says she no longer believes in decriminalizing illegal border crossings. Good. The media treat her new claims as indisputable. No questions asked. No explanations given.
Is Kamala still going to try to ban semiauto rifles through an executive order? Does she believe all Americans should “end up in the same place” no matter how hard they work? Does she support defunding the police? We have no clue.
Most of the media hackery is driven by partisanship. Some of it is also driven by access. There are practical concerns for journalists. Any reporters who truly challenge Kamala are sure to find themselves on the outs. This is why we need a press, not just an outlet, to take their professional responsibility seriously. Because right now, they don’t.
Instead, the same people who gaslit the nation, concealing the brittle state of the president for years — not just an abdication of their profession but of their responsibility as citizens — are now ensuring that voters won’t be subjected to Kamala’s swirling mind-bending tautologies and nonsensical stories.
And I’d thank them for it … if she weren’t running for president.
David Harsanyi is a senior editor at The Federalist, a nationally syndicated columnist, and author of six books—the most recent, The The Rise of BlueAnon: How the Democrats Became a Party of Conspiracy Theorists. Follow him on Twitter, @davidharsanyi.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
