Trump asks federal court to toss hush money conviction – Washington Examiner
Former President Donald Trump has requested a federal court to overturn his felony conviction related to a hush money case and to postpone his sentencing indefinitely. His attorney, Emil Bove, claims that the prosecution infringed on Trump’s constitutional rights and contradicts a recent Supreme Court ruling concerning presidential immunity. This legal move comes as Trump approaches the final weeks of a contentious campaign against Vice President Kamala Harris, who has criticized him using her background as a former prosecutor.
Trump’s legal team contends that transitioning the case to federal court would ensure a more impartial setting, citing perceived biases in state court proceedings. They intend to argue for case dismissal based on immunity, referencing the Supreme Court’s decision that limits the prosecution of former presidents for official actions.
The scheduled sentencing date of September 18 has raised alarms for Trump’s lawyers, as they believe it could disrupt the presidential election process and could be perceived as interference. Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, who had previously denied Trump’s request to move the case, will review this latest motion, which seeks to address the changed circumstances since the initial attempt.
Trump asks federal court to toss hush money conviction
Former President Donald Trump has asked a federal court to intervene in his New York hush money case, seeking to overturn his felony conviction and indefinitely delay his sentencing.
Trump attorney Emil Bove filed the request late Thursday, arguing that the prosecution violated his constitutional rights and contradicted a recent Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity. The filing comes as Trump is headed into the final weeks of a heated campaign against opponent Vice President Kamala Harris, who has used her status as a former prosecutor as a campaign talking point against the former president.
The filing contends that moving the case to a federal court would provide an “unbiased forum, free from local hostilities,” highlighting what they describe as “bias, conflicts of interest, and appearances of impropriety” in the state court proceedings, according to the four-page document.
If the federal court agrees to take over the case, Trump’s team plans to argue for dismissal based on immunity grounds, citing the Supreme Court’s July 1 decision that limits prosecutions of ex-presidents for official acts.
The timing of the sentencing, scheduled for Sept. 18, has also raised concerns among Trump’s lawyers, who argue it could interfere with the presidential election. They warn that if Trump is sentenced as planned, it could affect early voting and be seen as election interference.
Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, who previously rejected Trump’s request to move the case to federal court, will now decide on this latest motion.
Trump’s legal team argues that circumstances have changed since its initial attempt to move the case, claiming that state prosecutors misled the court regarding the involvement of Trump’s official duties in the trial. Defense attorneys also allege that testimony from Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen about uses of presidential powers was improperly included as evidence.
Meanwhile, Trump trial Judge Juan Merchan is weighing a separate request by the defense to delay the Sept. 18 sentencing, and his decision could arrive any day.
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office said in a court filing earlier this month that it did not oppose a delay in the sentencing. Merchan has also said he plans to rule on Sept. 16 whether the Supreme Court’s immunity decision should affect the jury’s guilty verdict in May.
Trump’s conviction involved 34 felony counts related to falsifying business records to cover up a $130,000 payment to porn star Stormy Daniels during the 2016 campaign. The former president maintains his innocence, arguing the case is a politically motivated “witch hunt.”
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...