Megyn Kelly Tracks Down Veterans Who Served with Tim Walz: ‘He’s Got Absolutely No Integrity’
The article discusses controversy surrounding Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, who was chosen as Vice President Kamala Harris’s running mate for the 2024 election. Journalist Megyn Kelly interviewed veterans from the Minnesota National Guard who served with Walz, and they expressed strong criticisms of him. Key allegations include that Walz abandoned his troops by choosing to run for Congress just before their deployment to Iraq and misrepresented his military rank, claiming to be a Command Sergeant Major, which he never earned.
Several veterans voiced their concerns during the interview, calling Walz a liar and highlighting his lack of integrity and cowardice, asserting that these traits disqualify him from holding a national position. The article notes that the controversy has prompted the Harris campaign to remove references to Walz’s unearned rank from its website, but it suggests that dishonesty is common within the Democratic Party, possibly explaining why Walz was chosen in the first place.
In order to succeed in today’s Democratic Party, one must possess the ability to lie without shame.
With that in mind, Vice President and 2024 presidential nominee Kamala Harris chose Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota as her running mate.
Sunday on the social media platform X, journalist Megyn Kelly announced a “must see” interview with veterans of the Minnesota National Guard who once served with Walz, including one veteran who said of the governor, “He’s got absolutely no integrity.”
That comment and others like it appeared in a 68-second preview. The full interview was released Monday.
Meanwhile, the preview alone added color to an emerging picture of Walz’s dishonesty and cowardice.
Since last month, when Harris chose Walz as her running mate, the controversy surrounding the governor’s lengthy service in the Minnesota National Guard has involved two basic facts.
First, Walz abandoned his men by retiring and running for Congress before the unit deployed to Iraq in 2005.
Then, Walz engaged in stolen valor by publicly characterizing himself as a Command Sergeant Major — a rank he never earned.
The veterans Kelly interviewed focused on these two transgressions. In the 68-second preview, only three of the four spoke, including the first veteran who described Walz as bereft of integrity.
A second veteran denounced Walz as a narcissist.
“It is morally indefensible. He didn’t care. It was all about him,” the second veteran said of Walz.
Then, a third veteran called Walz a “military impersonator.”
“I don’t understand how you do it morally,” the first veteran added.
From there, the second and third veterans took turns denouncing what they regarded as Walz’s stolen valor and cowardice.
“There’s a thousand parents out there that expect that person to lead those people into combat,” the third veteran said of Walz and the troops he abandoned.
“He’s a habitual liar. He lies about everything,” the second veteran said, referring in particular to Walz’s claim to a rank he did not earn.
Then, the third veteran returned to the issue of Walz having abandoned his troops.
“He basically said, ‘I’ve got better things to do. Go pick somebody else to go on a mission,’” the third veteran said.
This, according to the third veteran, should disqualify Walz from the vice presidency.
“If you sold out your Guard unit and abandoned them, what are you going to do at the national level?”
The second veteran agreed.
“I call him a coward because he is,” the second veteran said.
Must see!! ⬇️ https://t.co/JuTDdhQ0qL
— Megyn Kelly (@megynkelly) September 1, 2024
Since the controversy began, the Harris campaign has erased references to Walz’s unearned rank.
But that amounts to a mere matter of optics.
After all, in a party filled with career parasites and other diabolical operatives who lie without remorse, Walz’s cowardice and stolen valor do not distinguish him in any meaningful way.
In fact, his dishonesty probably endeared him to party leaders in the first place.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
