Harsh Penalties Reintroduced for Smash-and-Grab Robberies
California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed a new law aimed at addressing rampant retail thefts, including large-scale stealing schemes and smash-and-grab robberies. This legislation reinstates harsher penalties for those who cause damage exceeding $50,000 while committing felonies, a measure that had expired in 2018. The law is set to last until 2030 and reflects a broader effort by Democratic leaders to show they are tough on crime, especially as they face criticism regarding rising shoplifting rates.
The bill is part of a bipartisan package designed to combat thefts more effectively and increase consequences for repeat offenders. Public concern about retail theft has escalated due to noticeable crimes captured on video, leading to significant store closures and restricted product access in some areas. The California Retailers Association supports the new penalties as a deterrent, but navigating crime policies remains challenging for state Democrats, who have traditionally advocated for progressive reforms focused on rehabilitation rather than strict sentencing.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill Thursday bringing back tough criminal penalties targeting large-scale stealing schemes and smash-and-grab robberies that have fueled voter frustration across the state.
The new law requires prosecutors to start imposing harsher sentences again for those who damage or destroy property valued at more than $50,000 while committing a felony. A similar law expired in 2018. The new law will sunset by 2030.
The decision to bring back tough penalties comes as Democratic leaders attempt to prove that they are tough enough on crime — while also trying to convince voters to reject a ballot measure that would bring even harsher sentences for repeat offenders of shoplifting and drug charges.
While shoplifting has been a growing problem, large-scale, smash-and-grab thefts, in which groups of individuals brazenly rush into stores and take goods in plain sight, have become a crisis in California and elsewhere in recent years. Such crimes, often captured on video and posted on social media, have brought particular attention to the problem of retail theft in the state.
The new law is part of a bipartisan legislative package of about a dozen bills aiming to crack down on thefts, making it easier to go after repeat shoplifters and auto thieves and increase penalties for those running professional reselling schemes.
“Violent ‘sledgehammer crimes’ and flash-mob attacks by organized gangs must stop now,” Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas, who authored the bill, said in a statement. “Our business owners and workers should not have to live in fear that these crimes will come to their doorstep.”
The measure is also supported by the California Retailers Association, which said the new penalties would serve as “a deterrent against ‘smash and grabs’ and retail crime.”
How to tackle crimes in California has become increasingly difficult to navigate in recent years for state Democrats, many of whom have spent the last decade championing progressive policies to depopulate jails and prisons and invest in rehabilitation programs.
As the issue could even affect the makeup — and control — of Congress, some Democrats broke with party leadership and said they supported Proposition 36, the tough-on-crime approach.
It is hard to quantify the retail crime issue in California because of the lack of local data, but many point to major store closures and everyday products like toothpaste being locked behind plexiglass as evidence of a crisis. The California Retailers Association said it is challenging to quantify the issue in California because many stores don’t their data.
The Western Journal has reviewed this Associated Press story and may have altered it prior to publication to ensure that it meets our editorial standards.
Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...