In One Powerful Tirade, Megyn Kelly Proves Why Every Criminal Case Targeting Trump Is Nonsense

In a recent appearance on the “All-In Podcast” ​during the All-In Summit in Los ‍Angeles, conservative ⁢commentator Megyn⁤ Kelly⁤ discussed⁣ the ongoing legal ​challenges facing former President Donald Trump. Kelly, who has a background in⁤ law, expressed her belief that the various lawsuits and prosecutions against Trump​ are ⁤nonsensical and, in her view, indicative of a wider effort from multiple jurisdictions to undermine his candidacy.

When questioned⁢ about whether these cases reflect ​a coordinated effort among different prosecutors, Kelly affirmed that they do, pointing out discrepancies and issues she sees in the individual cases linked to Trump, which involve figures like E. Jean Carroll, New York Attorney General Letitia James, and others. She effectively articulated her criticisms, highlighting ‌a sentiment echoed by other commentators, including legal scholar Jonathan Turley.

Kelly’s passionate defense of Trump, ⁤where she dismantled the⁢ legal arguments ⁣against him, sparked a strong reaction from the audience, emphasizing her commitment to calling out perceived injustices. This aligns ‌with ⁤a growing ‍narrative on the right that suggests a need⁢ to scrutinize the ‍motivations behind the legal actions against Trump, particularly as they seem politically charged. Kelly’s statements reflect a broader ⁣internal and external debate over ⁢the implications of ⁤these ⁤legal battles on Trump’s political future.


Conservative commentator Megyn Kelly reminded everyone that the lawfare against former President Donald Trump is utter nonsense.

Kelly — a former lawyer — was able to speak to the absurdity of going after Trump like few others could during her appearance on the “All-In Podcast” from the All-In Summit in Los Angeles, which took place Sept. 8-10.

Her full appearance can be found here, but one moment sparked a tremendous reaction from the crowd when host Jason Calacanis asked Kelly about Trump.

The first minute of the clip is actually pretty bad for Calacanis as he tried to misrepresent the cases (he was possibly just confusing legal jargon) only to have Kelly correct him in a way that almost deflated any moment he had in the dialogue.

Regardless, Kelly took the chance to tell the panel and audience just why everything being brought against Trump is so nonsensical.

Calacanis — when he finally got around to it — asked, “Will you chalk all five [cases] up in your mind to five different jurisdictions, five different prosecutors, five different juries, and/or judges all conspiring to get him?”

She immediately shot back, “One hundred percent.”

Kelly proceeded to mention the problems with Trump’s cases involving author E. Jean Caroll, New York AG Leticia James, New York DA Alvin Bragg, Georgia DA Fani Willis, and his classified documents case involving attorney Jack Smith.

She even brought up the effort to prosecute those who were present on Jan. 6.

The reader can listen to Kelly dismantle each case one by one as she eloquently articulated the problems.

Putting it simply, it isn’t just those of us who lack legal training that sense something is amiss with the lawfare against Trump.

While its easy to chalk up criticism of the system against Trump to fanatical “MAGA Republicans” who would support him through thick and thin, there are other elements at play.

Kelly isn’t alone, as others, like legal scholar Jonathan Turley, have also been outspoken.

The lawfare against Trump proves how widespread the opposition to his re-election prospects is.

The left is willing to pull out all the stops.

After two assassination attempts, is it really so far-fetched to Calacanis that there is an evil cabal going after Trump by exploiting the system?




Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.


Read More From Original Article Here:

" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker