Schiff Calls for Big Tech Censorship in 2024 Election
Representative Adam Schiff, a Democrat from California, is advocating for major tech companies to increase censorship of what he labels “misinformation” and “disinformation” in the lead-up to the election. He recently sent a letter to CEOs of major platforms like Meta, X, TikTok, and Google, expressing concern over the spread of false information and urging platforms to enhance their actions against it. Schiff cites a study claiming that harmful content poses a significant threat to the upcoming election and questions how companies plan to adjust their policies to address this issue.
This demand comes despite Schiff previously promoting claims about alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election, which have since been widely discredited. He often conveyed unverified allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, suggesting he had seen evidence supporting these claims, which later investigations disputed, including a report by Special Counsel Robert Mueller stating there was no evidence of collusion.
Schiff’s recent push for censorship seems hypocritical to some, as he had previously been involved in efforts to suppress information related to the Russia investigation, including opposing the release of the Nunes memo and attempting to label social media users demanding its release as foreign operatives.
Furthermore, following Mark Zuckerberg’s admission that the federal government had pressured Facebook to restrict free speech during the 2020 election, Schiff’s request raises questions about government involvement in regulating online discourse.
Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., is demanding Big Tech censor so-called “misinformation” and “disinformation” ahead of the election. But just eight years ago Schiff spread the most damaging election misinformation ever — the Russia collusion hoax.
In a letter sent Monday to the CEO’s of several tech giants, including Meta, X, TikTok, and Google, Schiff demanded to know how the companies would censor free speech in order to save “democracy.”
“We write to your platforms as concerned Members of Congress, seeking further information about your preparation for and response to the spread of misinformation and disinformation,” the letter begins. “As the technology on social media platforms rapidly expands, companies must redouble their efforts to combat issues that threaten our democracy.”
The letter cites a study from NYU Stern Center for Business and Human Rights that says “distribution of false, hateful, and violent content” is a “threat” to this year’s election.
Schiff goes on to lament that platforms “have not increased their transparency for external groups who can aid in monitoring election information.” Schiff asks the companies whether they will change their policies between now and Election Day and how they will treat users who spread “mis- and disinformation” “differently” than “ordinary users.”
The letter was signed by seven of Schiff’s Democrat colleagues.
But for years Schiff leveraged his role as the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee to leak unsubstantiated allegations and misleading information to the media about former President Donald Trump’s alleged involvement with Russia.
Schiff claimed on MSNBC in 2017 that “there is more than circumstantial evidence now” linking the Trump campaign to Russia. He later told CNN he had seen “the kind of evidence” a grand jury would want to see. Schiff also told CNN there was “damning” evidence of collusion.
It was later discovered that the FBI obtained a surveillance warrant against Carter Page, a former Trump campaign staffer, via a secret FISA court. The FBI, according to the report from former Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, never disclosed to the court that Christopher Steele — who was behind the discredited “Steele Dossier” — was a spy. Schiff issued a counter-memo in 2018 that “contradicted reality,” as explained by my colleague Margot Cleveland.
Schiff falsely claimed the “FBI and DOJ officials did not ‘abuse’ the [FISA] process, omit material information, or subvert this vital tool to spy on the Trump campaign.”
When social media users began demanding Republicans #ReleaseTheMemo (the Nunes memo, to be clear), Schiff launched a campaign that called for major tech companies to “expose” and “deactivate” the accounts, falsely asserting the accounts were linked to foreign operatives. It was later uncovered by Matt Taibbi that Twitter executives could not identify “any significant activity connected to Russia.”
A report by Special Counsel Robert Mueller also later found no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, despite Schiff’s persistent claims that he had seen “damning” evidence of such collusion.
Schiff’s letter comes just weeks after Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg admitted that Facebook was pressured by the federal government to suppress free speech ahead of the 2020 election. Zuckerberg explained how federal officials within the FBI worked with Facebook to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story. Officials had previously told Facebook to be on the lookout for a dump of Russian “propaganda,” which Zuckerberg later told podcast host Joe Rogan was interpreted to include the laptop story. But Zuckerberg, in his letter to the House Judiciary Committee, said the report on the laptop was “not Russian disinformation, and in retrospect, we shouldn’t have demoted the story.”
Zuckerberg also told the House Judiciary Committee that “senior officials from the Biden Administration, including the White House, repeatedly pressured our teams for months to censor certain COVID-19 content, including humor and satire, and expressed a lot of frustration with our teams when we didn’t agree.”
“I regret that we were not more outspoken about it,” Zuckerberg wrote. “I also think we made some choices that, with the benefit of hindsight and new information, we wouldn’t make today. We’re ready to push back if something like this happens again.”
The reality is, as noted by my colleague John Daniel Davidson, misinformation and disinformation aren’t actually real, they are “Soviet terms that relate to psychological warfare.”
For more election news and updates, visit electionbriefing.com.
Brianna Lyman is an elections correspondent at The Federalist. Brianna graduated from Fordham University with a degree in International Political Economy. Her work has been featured on Newsmax, Fox News, Fox Business and RealClearPolitics. Follow Brianna on X: @briannalyman2
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
