‘Wicked’ Actress Loses It Over Minor Edit to Movie Poster, Can You Spot It at First Glance?

It ‍seems you’ve posted a long XML document that includes several script tags and ⁤a lengthy⁣ narrative regarding a controversy involving actress Cynthia Erivo and fan ‍art related to the⁢ film⁣ “Wicked.”⁤ The content discusses ⁤Erivo’s⁤ reaction ​to edits made to a promotional poster, suggesting that such edits were offensive because they altered her image in​ a⁣ way that she felt degraded⁤ her.

Key⁤ points from the narrative are:

1. **Cynthia Erivo’s Reaction**: ‌She found a⁢ fan-made poster that edited her appearance to be deeply offensive and​ degrading. Erivo expressed her feelings on social media, highlighting that the‍ edits erased her representation.

2. **Fan⁢ Art⁣ Context**: The edited poster was intended to resemble the ‌original​ Broadway musical’s artwork,⁤ which Erivo claims ⁣is an illustration,⁢ while the movie poster features her as a real person.

3. **Support from Ariana Grande**: Grande, who plays Glinda, expressed her respect for Erivo and acknowledged the complexities surrounding AI-generated art and ‍its adjustments ‌to images.

4. **Discussion of Racism**: Social media commentary surrounding the edits touched ​on the ⁤optics of representing a ⁢Black woman in the alterations compared to a white ⁣actress’s portrayal.

5. **Criticism ‌of the Hypersensitivity**: The narrative concludes by criticizing Erivo’s strong language ​around the edits, suggesting it reflects a sheltered perspective ⁢regarding genuine offense ​in society.

If you’d like to explore a ⁤specific‍ aspect of this narrative or if there’s something particular you want to discuss or⁣ summarize, please let me know!


A shadow is offensive?

I don’t think so. Most people don’t think so. But apparently, most people aren’t Cynthia Erivo. She’s the Broadway actress who will play the title role in the film adaptation of the wildly popular musical “Wicked.”

In case you managed to entirely miss that eminently missable play, it involves the transformation from Elphaba Thropp into the Wicked Witch of the West from “The Wizard of Oz” in terms sympathetic to the witch.

Yet, a fan-art poster which makes the poster for the movie look more like the poster for the play is apparently so deeply offensive to her that she’s calling it the most noxious thing to ever hit her eyes or ears.

“This is the wildest, most offensive thing I have seen,” the British-born Erivo said on Instagram last week, calling it equal to “awful Ai of us fighting” or people posing an offensive question first seen on social media a decade ago. (If you really want to know what the vulgar question is, click here. I am not responsible for any offense you might take to the childish obscenity of it, but there you go.)

“None of this is funny. None of it is cute,” she continued.

“It degrades me. It degrades us.”

Because it put a shadow over her eyes?

As people noted, this was a bit of an overreaction, particularly because it resembled the iconic poster for the original musical:

Her explanation for this was that “[t]he original poster is an ILLUSTRATION.” (Oh, and the movie poster is a screenshot from a cinéma vérité production?)

“I am a real-life human being, who chose to look right down the barrel of the camera to you, the viewer. . . because, without words we communicate with our eyes,” she wrote.

“Our poster is a homage, not an imitation,” Erivo added. “To edit my face and hide my eyes is to erase me. And that is just deeply hurtful.”

Just to be clear, this is fan art that existed to make the film poster look more like the Broadway one. And it’s not like she objects to fan art, as demonstrated by the fact she apparently celebrated this pic, definitely not from the initial promotional materials:

Ariana Grande, who plays the Glinda the good witch in the “Wicked” films, supported Erivo in remarks to Variety, although she made it sound like an artist issue with artificial intelligence.

“I think it’s very complicated because I find AI so conflicting and troublesome sometimes, but I think it’s just kind of such a massive adjustment period. This is something that is so much bigger than us, and the fans are gonna have fun and make their edits,” she said.

“I have so much respect for my sister, Cynthia, and I love her so much,” she added. “It’s just a big adjustment period. It’s so much stimulation about something that’s so much bigger than us.”

While one understands that there’s going to be an adjustment period to artificial intelligence, AI fanart is hardly the most offensive thing one has ever seen. Heck, it’s not even the most offensive thing about this story (see: asterisked question in Erivo’s initial Instagram post).

Erivo has more or less been tight-lipped about what her problem with AI is, although it’s assumedly the same ethical concerns we all have about it. However, the matter drew the attention of some fans, who thought that racism was involved.

Again, though: The racism here isn’t overt, or even covert. It’s interpretational, and loosely at that. And even then, for anyone of any race to say that this the single most loathsome act of bigotry they’ve ever experienced in this world is preposterous.

If this is “the wildest, most offensive thing I have seen,” count your blessings at a sheltered life.

Otherwise, cease the absurd hyperbole.




Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker