Senate amends Laken Riley immigration bill to cover assaulted officers – Washington Examiner
The Senate recently amended the Laken Riley Act to include the assault of police officers as a criterion for detaining illegal immigrants. This change marks the first alteration to the bill,which had previously received bipartisan support in the House. The legislation mandates that federal authorities detain illegal immigrants who are charged,arrested,or convicted of theft-related crimes until their deportation. Additionally, it grants state attorneys general greater authority to file lawsuits against the federal government concerning its management of illegal immigration. The bill is named after Laken Riley, a 22-year-old nursing student who was tragically killed.
Senate amends Laken Riley immigration bill to cover assaulted police officers
The Senate approved its first change to the Laken Riley Act on Wednesday evening, adding the assault of police officers to the list of offenses that trigger the detention of illegal immigrants.
The bill, which passed the House on a bipartisan basis last week, would require federal authorities to detain illegal immigrants charged, arrested, or convicted of theft-related crimes until deportation and empower state attorneys general to more easily bring lawsuits against the federal government over its handling of illegal immigration.
The act was named after the 22-year-old nursing student killed last year while jogging at the University of Georgia, allegedly by a Venezuelan illegal immigrant who was previously arrested but released.
Wednesday’s vote marked the first chance senators have had to alter the bill. The amendment on law enforcement, proposed by Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), would add assaulting officers or any crime causing “serious bodily injury” to the list of offenses that trigger mandatory detention.
It passed 70-25, with 21 Democrats crossing the aisle to vote with all Republicans.
The Senate considered a second amendment, filed by Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE), but it failed along party lines 46-49. It would have removed the provision governing states suing the federal government, a component Democrats say would “encourage endless litigation” by Republican attorneys general as currently written.
Coons made the case that passing his amendment would assuage many of Democrats’ concerns. Democrats fear the litigation component could also result in any singular judge barring visas from entire countries at the request of Republican states.
“I will remind you, our states’ attorneys general are roughly equally divided between the parties, and attorneys general can now and today sue against what they believe is manifest injustice in the federal immigration system,” he said. “This provision would encourage them to sue down to individual detention and release decisions.”
If the legislation is eventually passed by the Senate, the House will need to approve the amended bill before sending it to the president’s desk. But the measure still has several hurdles to clear in the upper chamber.
WHAT TO EXPECT FROM TRUMP’S MASS DEPORTATION PLAN
Democrats want more amendments, such as exempting minors and so-called Dreamers who were brought to the United States illegally as children, before most of them will commit additional support likely required to clear another 60-vote filibuster threshold.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) vowed to hold more amendment votes before another procedural hurdle, as lawmakers behind the scenes continued to negotiate which provisions to bring to the floor in the coming days.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...