Senators sound alarm over growing Chinese influence at Panama Canal – Washington Examiner

Senators from both parties recently⁢ expressed concerns about increasing Chinese influence at the Panama Canal during a Senate committee hearing. They warned that such⁣ influence could⁢ threaten U.S. ⁢trade and national security. Senator ​ted Cruz⁣ highlighted the potential⁢ risks posed by Chinese ⁤control over nearby ports and construction ⁤projects, suggesting that China could disrupt U.S. trade by blocking ​the canal if needed. He ⁤noted that U.S. cargo constitutes a significant portion of canal traffic⁤ and that high transit fees‍ disproportionately impact ⁣American businesses. Senator Maria ‌Cantwell echoed these worries,specifically mentioning​ the⁤ proximity of ⁤Chinese ports to the canal​ and the installation of Chinese technology in the ‍area.

The⁢ discussion occurred ​amid broader tensions‍ surrounding the​ Panama Canal, which the U.S. controlled untill 1999.Some senators called for increased support for American companies bidding on projects in Panama ‌to counteract Chinese influence. Simultaneously occurring, the Panamanian government ‍denied any significant foreign interference in its operations. The Panama ‍Canal remains crucial for U.S. trade, with a ample share ​of American container traffic passing through, further illustrating the strategic importance of⁤ the waterway.


Senators sound alarm over growing Chinese influence at Panama Canal

Senators on both sides of the aisle raised concerns over how Chinese aggression and influence on the Panama Canal could have major implications on U.S. trade and national security during a hearing in a key Senate committee on Tuesday morning. 

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), the chairman of the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee, discussed a scenario in which China could disrupt U.S. trade by blocking off the canal. 

“Chinese companies are right now building a bridge across the canal at a slow pace so as to take nearly a decade. And Chinese companies control container ports at either end. The partially-completed bridge gives China the ability to block the canal without warning and the ports give China ready observation posts to time that action,” Cruz said during his opening remarks. “This situation, I believe, poses acute risks to U.S. national security.”

The Texas senator also raised concerns about what he called “high fees for canal transit” that “disproportionately affect Americans.” 

“U.S. cargo accounts for nearly three-quarters of canal transits. U.S. Navy vessels pay additional fees that apply only to warships. Canal profits regularly exceed $3 billion this money comes from both American taxpayers and consumers in the form of higher cost for good,” Cruz added.

Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA), the ranking member of the panel, also expressed concern about Chinese-owned ports and “their proximity to the canal.” Ports on both ends of the canal are owned by Hutchinson, a Hong Kong-based company that they fear could be subject to Chinese influence. 

“I am concerned about Chinese-owned ports in Panama and their proximity to the canal,” she said during her opening statement. “I’m also deeply concerned about the installation of Chinese equipment from Huawei and Chinese companies near the canal.”

The hearing before the committee comes as President Donald Trump has vowed that the United States would take back the Panama Canal, accusing the country of charging America “exorbitant rates” to use it and appearing to hint at Chinese influence over the waterway. Trump has not been clear on how he intends to reclaim the canal, nor did the hearing give any clarity.

The head of the Federal Maritime Commission testified that American companies need to be pursuing development contracts in Panama in order to take back influence.

Louis E. Sola, Federal Maritime Commission chairman, testifies before the Senate Commerce Committee on Jan. 28, 2025. (Graeme Jennings/ Washington Examiner)

“Chinese companies have been able to pursue billions of dollars in development contracts in Panama, many of which were projects directly on or adjacent to the Panama Canal. Many were no-bid contracts,” said Louis E. Sola, Federal Maritime Commission chairman.

“We need to increase support for American companies seeking to do business in Panama and throughout the Americas. Chinese companies must not be the sole bidders on contracts,” he said in his testimony.

Panama had denied claims of Chinese influence, with President José Raúl Mulino stating that “there is no presence of any nation in the world that interferes with our administration,” according to the Associated Press.

The Panama Canal connects the Pacific and Atlantic through Panama. In 1905, Panama granted the U.S. rights to build and administer the canal. It was the single most expensive construction project in U.S. history at the time, costing approximately $375,000,000, or $15 billion today. 

It was operated entirely by the U.S. government from its opening in 1914 until 1977. Negotiations and treaty stipulations negotiated under President Jimmy Carter slowly ceded control to the Panamanian government until 1999.

More than 40% of U.S. container traffic, valued at roughly $270 billion annually, transits the Panama Canal, a point Joseph Kramek, president and CEO of the World Shipping Council, highlighted in his testimony. 

 

“Cargo coming from Asia and bound for the U.S. Gulf and East Coast ports always transits the Panama Canal. Similarly, cargo being exported from U.S. East Coast ports, a large share of which are U.S. agricultural exports, like soybeans, corn, cotton, livestock, and dairy, also almost always transits the Panama Canal,” Kramek said. “The result is that 75% of canal traffic originates in or is bound for the United States.”

The hearing comes as Secretary of State Marco Rubio plans to visit Panama as part of a trip to Latin America next week, part of his first trip in his new role. He also plans to visit Guatemala, El Salvador, Costa Rica and the Dominican Republic, according to the State Department.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker