Why Congress Needs To Swiftly Pass Concealed-Carry Reciprocity

Republicans in the U.S. House and Senate have introduced the Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act, which President Donald Trump has vowed to sign.

Congress faces a crucial opportunity to reaffirm a cornerstone of our constitutional freedoms: the right to bear arms. National concealed-carry reciprocity legislation would ensure that state borders do not restrict or invalidate this fundamental right, guaranteed by the Second Amendment.

At its heart, this is about acknowledging that constitutional rights are universal, not dependent on geography. The Constitution does not stop at state lines.

A Natural Right, Not a State Privilege

Imagine if a woman lost her right to vote, protected by the 19th Amendment, simply because she crossed into a state with different historical views on sex roles. Or consider if a journalist’s First Amendment protections were recognized in one state but ignored in another. Such infringements are unthinkable — and rightly so.

Yet this is precisely the reality facing law-abiding gun owners who travel with concealed-carry permits. Their constitutional right to self-defense, which has been affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court, is undermined by a patchwork of state laws.

Like other rights enshrined in the Bill of Rights, the Second Amendment exists to protect individuals from government overreach. Allowing states to restrict concealed-carry permits undermines the universality of these protections.

In states with left-leaning legislatures, such as New York and Illinois, gun rights are subjected to restrictions that would never be tolerated if applied to other constitutional rights. This double standard is deliberate. Unlike other amendments, the Second Amendment has been politicized to the point it is often treated as a second-class right.

Opponents of gun rights often cite public safety concerns, but these arguments fail to justify selective infringements on constitutional freedoms. Law-abiding concealed-carry permit holders are among the most thoroughly vetted individuals in the nation. They’ve undergone extensive background checks, training, and permitting processes.

Denying them the ability to exercise their rights simply because they cross into a different state does not enhance public safety. It merely creates an unjust system that penalizes responsible citizens.

The Practical Case for Reciprocity

Beyond the constitutional arguments, there is a compelling practical case for national concealed-carry reciprocity. The current mélange of state laws creates confusion and exposes travelers to potential legal jeopardy. For example, a concealed-carry permit holder driving from Pennsylvania to Florida could unwittingly become a felon upon entering New Jersey, where his permit is not recognized.

National reciprocity streamlines these inconsistencies by requiring states to honor permits other states have issued, similar to how driver’s licenses are universally recognized. Importantly, this legislation would not force states to change their permitting standards. It would simply ensure that permits granted in one state are respected in another, preserving the rights of permit holders while respecting state sovereignty.

Concealed-carry permit holders are statistically among the most law-abiding groups in the country. They commit crimes at rates significantly lower than the general population, including police officers. Allowing them to carry across state lines would not lead to chaos or increased crime. Instead, it would affirm their right to protect themselves and their families wherever they go.

A Matter of Equality and Justice

At its core, national concealed-carry reciprocity is about equality under the law. The current system effectively creates a two-tiered structure of Second Amendment rights, where citizens in some states enjoy full protections while others are without. This disparity is fundamentally at odds with the principles of equality before the law enshrined in the Constitution.

Leftists argue that national reciprocity would infringe on states’ rights. However, states’ rights cannot justify violating individual constitutional freedoms. Just as states cannot override the First or 14th Amendments, they should not be allowed to undermine the Second. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and its protections must apply equally to all Americans.

Passing national concealed-carry reciprocity is not merely a policy decision, it reaffirms the durability of our Constitution. It ensures that the rights guaranteed in the Bill of Rights are not negotiable or subject to arbitrary geographic limitations.

Congress has a duty to uphold the Constitution and protect the rights of law-abiding citizens. The Second Amendment is no less fundamental than the freedoms of speech, religion, or due process. So if Congress is to fulfill its solemn obligation to the American people, it must end the unjust treatment of gun owners and ensure their rights are respected nationwide.

National concealed-carry reciprocity is not a radical proposal; it is a necessary step to preserve the principles of freedom and equality that define America. Congress must act now to make it the law of the land.

Adrian Norman is a writer, political commentator, and author of the book “The Art of the Steal: Exposing Fraud & Vulnerabilities in America’s Elections.” You can reach him daily on Twitter: @adriannormandc.