The Western Journal

Amid Dem Outrage About USAID, Ernst Sets Record Straight on Potentially Shuttered Agency

In recent news,‍ the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has faced important scrutiny and upheaval due ⁢to actions taken by the Trump governance.As of February 2025, President Trump has ⁤frozen USAID’s budget and shuttered its headquarters,⁣ provoking strong reactions from lawmakers, particularly among Democrats.⁤ Some have labeled this move as⁢ a precursor to dictatorship, with Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen threatening legal action against the administration ‌for attempting to dismantle ‍the agency.

USAID, which had a budget of $44.7 billion for 2024, plays a critical role in providing humanitarian assistance,‌ reducing poverty, and promoting democratic governance globally. However,its operations ⁣have been criticized for a lack of transparency regarding its spending,leading‍ to ⁣calls for investigations from⁢ Republican ​lawmakers like senator Joni Ernst. Critics have raised concerns that funds might ⁣potentially be misallocated, especially in case studies like Ukraine, were aid flows through the United Nations, leaving questions about ‌its destination.

The ⁤current administration’s⁢ viewpoint,including support from figures like Elon Musk,argues for more accountability and⁤ a reevaluation of underperforming⁣ agencies like USAID,suggesting that its functions may be better integrated into the Department ​of State. ⁤As this controversy unfolds, the fate of ‍USAID remains uncertain, with ongoing debates about its effectiveness and ⁤the broader implications of its potential dissolution for international aid efforts.


Before Monday, how many Very Online Democrats do you think even knew about the U.S. Agency for International Development or what it did?

They still don’t know what it does, I don’t think — but the freezing of the agency’s budget and the closing of its headquarters as of Monday, according to The Wall Street Journal, became one of the first great outrages of the second Trump administration, with one lawmaker declaring the move “what the beginning of dictatorship looks like.”

It’s unclear what will happen to USAID, which had a budget of $44.7 billion in 2024. Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency want to eliminate it, while Secretary of State Marco Rubio seemed amenable to folding its functions into the Department of State.

Neither pleased Democratic lawmakers, who tried to enter USAID headquarters Monday and were turned away. Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, leader of the group, vowed to take the administration to court to stop them from “undoing USAID,” according to The Hill. Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar, meanwhile — always able to be counted on for the most OTT take on anything — provided that “dictatorship” quote at the halfhearted protest:

So, what’s the big deal? What does USAID do, anyway?

From an archived version of its currently shuttered website: “We work together with individuals, communities, and countries globally to improve everyday lives. USAID’s efforts provide humanitarian assistance, reduce poverty, strengthen democratic governance, advance economic opportunities, and help achieve progress beyond programs. Our work benefits people around the world, including those in the United States. USAID’s investments help achieve sustainable development progress, advancing our collective security, health, and prosperity.”

Well, that sounds 1) great and 2) profoundly vague. So OK — what does the organization really do?

Good question, GOP Sen. Joni Ernst of Iowa said. Such a good question she had to launch an investigation with a fellow Republican to get some transparency on spending matters, according to the Daily Caller.

Speaking with Greta Van Susteren on Newsmax on Monday, she said that while “that there are good programs that have existed out there that have benefited the stability of many regions around the world,” there’s also a lot of money unaccounted for.

“Unfortunately, we have seen those at the top again that have really tried to stop members of Congress from understanding how our taxpayer dollars are flowing through the agency,” she said, noting that she and GOP Rep. Mike McCaul of Texas began a formal investigation into their finances last year.

“We know in the example of Ukraine — and this is what I was very focused on — is the humanitarian aid wasn’t getting distributed to humanitarian aid contractors. Instead, it was being sent to the United Nations, where we have absolutely no idea where that money is going from that point forward,” she said.

“So we tried to call the question on USAID, and, again, they threatened us, they stonewalled us, until I was able to join forces with Congressman Mike McCaul and announce a formal investigation of the agency,” she continued. “And then, even they slow walked providing any data to us.”

Also, while there are plenty of places in the world where humanitarian money is needed — Africa, for instance — she said Americans needed to know it was going for inoculations and not indoctrination.

“I would rather see us feeding impoverished nations. But we need to know that those dollars are doing it and not going to fund terrorist organizations, not going to support a gender ideology in certain regions,” she said.

“We have to know that it’s going for a specific goal that is approved by Congress and, unfortunately, USAID has abused this system.”

And, yes, as White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt pointed out, plenty of USAID funding has apparently been going to wokeness-related activities:

The people of Peru may want for many things, but thank heavens a U.S.-funded transgender comic book apparently isn’t one of them.

Let this be an object lesson going forward: The issue isn’t that USAID is so critical, or that winding it down would be dictatorial. What the Trump administration wants is a transparent swamp. How much gets wasted via obfuscation and layers of bureaucracy?

Our federal government has created layers of bureaucracy to create enough obfuscation, so that you never find out. It’s the world’s most expensive administrative onion, and there are so many layers to it that the Beltway elite feel confident that nobody will put in the effort to peel them away.

Investigations and inquiries get nowhere. Freezes and DOGE intervention? That, if the anaphylactic reaction to the USAID move is any indication, is enough of a threat to the ossified establishment Washington process that permanent D.C. is perspiring. Good.




Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker