Despite Defiant Dems, Kash Patel FBI Nomination Advances

The Senate Judiciary Committee recently voted on ⁤the confirmation of Kash Patel as FBI director, wiht the vote splitting along party lines – 12 ​Republicans in favor and 10 Democrats against. democrats expressed strong opposition to Patel, describing him as “perilous” and⁢ an “inexperienced ⁣loyalist,” while raising concerns regarding his perceived hostility‍ toward‍ the FBI. ‌Despite their ⁤opposition, Democrats acknowledged they lacked sufficient votes to block his confirmation.

Republican members, including Committee chair Chuck grassley, ‌argued that Patel is necessary for ⁢reforming an FBI​ they characterize as ‌politically ​biased and “weaponized” against Americans. Grassley defended Patel against the⁣ Democrats’​ accusations, suggesting that the opposition’s critiques ‌stemmed from political motivations rather than evidence. Democratic senators voiced​ their⁤ character⁢ concerns about Patel and aimed to⁤ highlight issues they believe are more pressing to the public, such as rising living⁢ costs, rather than focusing on the FBI.

The article ⁣concludes with a mention of Beth Brelje, the author and elections correspondent ⁣for The Federalist, emphasizing her background ‍in investigative journalism.


Tone deaf and powerless, Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee ran out of stall tactics and finally had to submit to a vote Thursday on the confirmation of President Donald Trump’s FBI director nominee, Kash Patel.

“We have a pretty good idea of what the outcome will be today, and I am appalled that my Republican colleagues are prepared to confirm a man so publicly hostile to the agency, its people, its goals, its mission, that he intends to lead,”  Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., said.

Yes Dick, we all did. Last week. When Democrats delayed the vote for a week, and again Thursday morning when Democrats forced two more hours of pointless rehashing of last week’s discussion.

The committee voted along party lines, Republicans 12 and Democrats 10, to advance Patel to the Senate floor for full confirmation.

Democrats never had the votes to block Patel, so they spent time smearing his reputation.

Patel is “extremely dangerous” because of “all of his wild MAGA behavior,” Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., warned.

Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., called Patel an “inexperienced loyalist.”

“This agency should be above politics,” Durbin said, while making it all about politics. “I will not be surprised when my Republican colleagues again claim that the Democrats have weaponized the FBI.”

Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., said the American people are tired of two tiers of justice.

“While my colleagues may be upset for today, I think it’s important to note that they sat silently while you had parents and people of faith and so many that were being confronted [by the FBI].,” Blackburn said. “I know they’re trying to stall and obstruct, but it is important to note that the American people, on Nov. 5, voted to see change. They want transparency and accountability. They want the end of two tiers of justice, and they want to restore faith in our American institutions now.”

Democrats were concerned about saving the jobs of establishment FBI employees.

“I don’t think the American people were up in arms about purging the Department of Justice or the FBI,” Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, said. “I don’t think they were up in arms wanting a stop to or freeze to federal grants to states. I don’t think they were up in arms calling for the [National Institute of Health] to take action that will result in the halting of medical research. No, what they were up in arms was, let’s lower the price of food, milk, bread. They’re still waiting.” 

Committee Chair Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa opened the voting meeting with a lengthy, admonishment of Democrats and the FBI.  

“Mr. Patel should be considered our next FBI director, because the FBI has been infected by political bias and weaponized against the American people. Mr. Patel knows it. Mr. Patel exposed it, and Mr. Patel has been targeted for it,” Grassley said. “The FBI has fallen into really old habits and is long overdue for massive reform. Mr. Patel is the man to do it, and that’s why he’s being attacked so viciously right now. Before we even had a hearing, committee members called Mr. Patel by these adjectives: dishonest, untrustworthy, lacking in character, a wolf at the door, a conspiracy theorist, a staunch political loyalist, and lastly, a nightmare. Since his nomination was announced, committee Democrats have sent at least 11 letters to 11 different agencies and parties demanding records and urging investigation into Mr. Patel. Each letter breathlessly accuses Mr. Patel of something new, often citing ‘highly credible anonymous sources’ that don’t fit the facts.”

“We’ve examined every detail of his life, and he’s been subjected to relentless attacks on his character during this whole period of time. Now what we’ve learned from this committee process is what we knew from his resume. Mr. Patel has spent his whole career fighting for righteous causes.”


Beth Brelje is an elections correspondent for The Federalist. She is an award-winning investigative journalist with decades of media experience.


Read More From Original Article Here: Despite Defiant Dems, Kash Patel FBI Nomination Advances

" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker