Washington Examiner

Independent attorney recommends judge dismiss Eric Adams case with prejudice – Washington Examiner

An independent attorney, Paul Clement, has recommended that a case against new York City Mayor eric Adams be dismissed with prejudice, meaning it cannot be refiled in the future. This suggestion follows a request from the Department of Justice (DOJ) to drop the charges, which Clement supports due to the ⁤prosecutionS weakened stance. He ⁤noted that keeping the case open​ could cause ongoing⁢ anxiety for Adams, similar to the “sword of⁤ Damocles.” The DOJ’s Deputy Attorney General, Emil Bove, emphasized that the case could hinder Adams’s cooperation with⁢ the Trump management on‌ immigration issues and could become ‍problematic as the 2025 mayoral primaries ‌approach. If the case is dismissed with prejudice, it would ​provide a definitive closure for Adams, ⁢preventing any potential re-litigation of the charges.


Independent attorney recommends judge dismiss Eric Adams case with prejudice

An independent attorney appointed by Judge Dale Ho to advise on New York City Mayor Eric Adams‘s corruption case said in a court filing that the case should be dismissed with prejudice.

Paul Clement, Ho’s answer to a legal problem in which the prosecution against Adams went limp in its offensive, took the Department of Justice’s request to dismiss charges to the next level in his recommendation.

If Adams’s case is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be brought again. Clement added this to his recommendation because he said the case could hang over Adams’s head like the “sword of Damocles.”

Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove, the DOJ official who requested Adams’s charges be dismissed, argued that the case jeopardized his ability to cooperate with the Trump administration on combating illegal immigration. He also said it came too close to the 2025 mayoral primaries.

DEMOCRATIC LEADERS FLOUNDER IN FACE OF DOJ’S ERIC ADAMS DISMISSAL REQUEST

“The executive’s unilateral option for ending a prosecution — namely, a pardon — more closely resembles a dismissal with prejudice,” Clement wrote.

“And the executive’s undoubted power to decline to initiate a prosecution leaves a citizen’s liberty untouched. But a dismissal without prejudice creates a palpable sense that the prosecution outlined in the indictment and approved by a grand jury could be renewed, a prospect that hangs like the proverbial Sword of Damocles over the accused,” he added.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker