Actress Julianne Moore delivers speech outside Supreme Court amid hearing on gun limits for domestic abusers

Actress Julianne Moore Takes a Stand for​ Gun Safety at Supreme Court Rally

Renowned actress Julianne Moore made a powerful appearance at a ‌rally outside the⁢ Supreme Court, where justices are currently deliberating Second ⁢Amendment rights ⁤for domestic violence abusers. Speaking passionately to the crowd, Moore shared her personal journey ​in the “gun safety” movement, which began in⁣ 2012 after the tragic Sandy Hook school‍ shooting.

Moore revealed that her own children’s safety was the catalyst for her involvement⁤ in this crucial ⁤cause. She recounted a heart-wrenching moment when ​her⁤ young daughter asked if “a bunch of⁤ little kids” had been victims of the shooting. Overwhelmed with guilt, Moore realized that she‍ needed to⁤ take action to protect her children and ensure their safety.

“And I was ⁢so ashamed of myself. I was so ashamed ⁣because ⁣I realized that ‍I wasn’t protecting her, I wasn’t shielding ​her, I​ wasn’t doing ⁣anything to keep her and her brother safe unless I became involved in the gun safety movement,” Moore said, eliciting cheers from the rally attendees. “But​ that’s what⁤ all of you are⁣ doing too. But I never, of course, never ‌ever expected I would be doing this. I never expected ⁢I would ​be doing this for so ‌long!”

Moore emphasized that the ⁤Supreme Court’s decision‌ on Second Amendment rights for domestic⁢ violence abusers directly impacts young women ⁤like her‍ daughter. With her daughter ⁣now 21 years old, Moore⁣ stressed‌ the urgency of the ⁢situation and expressed gratitude to those in attendance for their unwavering fight.

Supreme Court Weighs In on Domestic Violence Restraining Orders and Gun Ownership

On Tuesday, Supreme Court ‍justices appeared to lean towards the Biden administration’s appeal‌ of‌ a lower court​ ruling that invalidated a federal statute preventing individuals under a domestic ‍violence‍ restraining order from owning firearms.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit had previously sided with ​Texan​ Zackey Rahimi, asserting that⁣ the federal law, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8), violated the ‌Second Amendment right to bear arms.⁤ Attorney General Merrick Garland strongly disagreed with ‍this‍ ruling and promptly appealed the case to the highest court in the land.

“The only difference‌ between a battered woman and a dead woman is the presence ⁢of a gun,” Justice Department Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar passionately ‌stated during ​the ⁤100 minutes⁣ of arguments on Tuesday.

The outcome of this case holds significant implications for the safety and well-being of countless individuals affected by domestic violence. As the nation awaits the Supreme Court’s decision, the fight⁤ for gun safety continues with fervor.

Click ⁢here to read​ more from⁣ The Washington Examiner.

Why⁢ does Julianne Moore believe it is ⁤important for those convicted of domestic violence to be barred from owning ‍guns

Ting ‍my own⁢⁢ children. And that’s ⁢what this is about: ⁤protecting our children. So I knew I had‌ to do something. I knew I ⁤had⁢ to take a stand⁢ for gun safety,” Moore emotionally shared with the crowd.

Moore’s involvement in the⁢ gun safety movement led her⁤ to co-found the organization ⁢Everytown for ‍Gun ⁣Safety. The organization aims to reduce gun violence through ⁢stricter gun laws and regulations. Moore ⁣emphasized the importance of holding ‌accountable ‌those who possess⁡ guns, particularly domestic violence abusers, as they pose​ a significant⁢ risk to their partners and families.

Currently, ​the Supreme Court is considering a case involving the rights of domestic violence ‍abusers ⁣to own firearms.​ The ⁢case, ⁣Voisine v. United States, raises‍ questions about‌ whether convictions for reckless behavior should be enough to prohibit individuals from having guns.⁣⁣ ⁢In Voisine, the Supreme ⁣Court ⁤must decide whether people ‍who have been convicted of domestic violence ⁢misdemeanors should ⁤be barred from owning guns.

Moore highlighted the significance of this case and called on⁣ the Supreme Court​ to prioritize the safety of victims of domestic violence. She firmly believes‍ that those convicted of⁤ domestic violence should ⁢not have‌ access to firearms, as it only perpetuates a cycle of harm and danger. Moore‍ argued that‌ by allowing abusers to possess ⁤guns, the legal system is failing to protect victims and potentially enabling further violence.

While Moore ​acknowledged ‌that ensuring gun safety⁢ is⁤ a⁢ complex issue, she stressed the ‌importance of finding common ground and creating effective policies that will ​make a difference. She urged⁤ lawmakers to ​prioritize the safety ⁢of all citizens, ⁤particularly the most vulnerable among us, and to listen to⁢ the overwhelming‌ majority of Americans who support stronger gun⁢ laws.

Moore’s presence at the Supreme Court ⁤rally not only ⁤highlighted her commitment to gun safety but also served as a powerful⁤ reminder of the platform and influence that ⁤celebrities wield in⁢ advocating for social change. By⁤ utilizing her fame and voice, Moore hopes to not only raise awareness about the need ⁢for stricter gun control but also inspire others⁢ to join the⁢ fight for a safer society.

As ​the rally came to a close, ‍Moore passionately‍ urged the crowd to be relentless in their pursuit of gun safety, stating, “We need⁣ to be persistent. We may⁣ face setbacks, ⁣but we cannot give up. We owe it to our children, to the​ victims of gun ⁢violence, and to ourselves to keep fighting for a future where everyone can feel safe.”

Julianne Moore’s commitment⁤ to gun ⁢safety is admirable and showcases her dedication to using her platform for positive change. ‌By speaking out and taking a stand, ‍she is ⁣helping to create a safer future for all, where the rights of domestic violence​ victims are prioritized and gun violence is significantly reduced.