Coca-Cola’s Silent Shift After Years of Backing BLM

After Years of Supporting BLM, Coca-Cola Quietly Makes a Big Change

It ‌seems that Coca-Cola Company has​ finally realized that Black Lives Matter is more than just​ a slogan, but a real group with ⁣its ⁤own agenda that⁣ may not align‌ with the company’s brand. And what brought about this realization? BLM openly supporting a⁤ terrorist organization.

Did Coca-Cola not realize that⁣ a group founded by self-described Marxists, known for causing social⁣ unrest, couldn’t be trusted?⁤ Apparently, this was the breaking point.

Following BLM⁤ chapters openly endorsing attacks by Hamas, Coca-Cola conveniently removed any mention of their donation to BLM from their ‌website without any explanation.

The donation, made by Sprite in June 2020, was part of a campaign ⁢called “The Give Back” ‌aimed at supporting communities affected by​ COVID-19 and racial inequality. ​However, it seems that​ Coca-Cola has ⁤now distanced itself from ‍BLM.

So, what⁢ caused this change? Perhaps it was the⁤ image⁣ of paragliders symbolizing the⁣ Hamas terrorists who attacked innocent civilians. The​ official Black Lives Matter Chicago account expressed support for⁣ Hamas after the attacks, along with⁢ other​ BLM organizations.

Despite all of this, Coca-Cola was⁢ still promoting its connection with BLM until recently. It’s unclear why they made ​this​ change, but it’s possible‌ they were concerned about ​the backlash from supporting a group associated with terrorism.

It’s ironic that corporate ⁢America supported⁢ BLM despite its extremist views ​and⁢ controversies. It’s not surprising that BLM would support terrorist acts, given its history of radicalism.

Overall, it’s clear that Coca-Cola has distanced itself from BLM, but the ⁣question remains: why did ‍it take them so long to realize the true nature of this organization?

Is BLM beneficial to America?

• Yes
• No

A Note from Our Founder:

Silicon Valley and the Big Tech tyrants have done everything they can ‍to put The Western Journal out‌ of business. Our faithful subscribers have kept us going.

If you’ve‌ never chosen⁢ to subscribe, let me be honest: We need your help ⁤today.

I also want ⁢to‍ send you an ⁤autographed copy of “Counterpunch,” which will give you a‌ plan to fight back for our beloved country.

Subscribe right now – The Western Journal stands for truth in this difficult time.

Please stand ⁣with us by⁢ subscribing today.

Floyd G. Brown
Founder of The Western Journal

The post After Years of Supporting BLM, Coca-Cola Quietly Makes ​a Big Change appeared first ‍on⁤ The Western Journal.

What message is Coca-Cola sending ‍by quietly removing mention ⁣of its donation to ‍BLM from its website?

Or these⁤ terrorists, calling⁣ them “freedom‌ fighters” and praising their actions. This support for terrorism is ⁤not aligned with Coca-Cola’s values ​​of peace, equality, and ⁤social justice.

Coca-Cola has built ⁤its brand on promoting diversity and inclusivity. It has positioned itself as a champion ⁣for⁤ equality and⁤ has been vocal​ in its support for the Black⁢ Lives ⁢Matter movement. However, the recent public ⁤support for terrorism by some​ BLM ⁤chapters has put Coca-Cola in⁤ a difficult position. How could a company that claims ‍to stand for justice and fairness continue to ‌support a ​group ⁣that‌ openly endorses violence ⁣against innocent civilians?

It is clear that Coca-Cola ⁢had to make‍ a choice. It could either continue to support⁤ a movement ​that has lost‍ its way and is promoting⁤ violence,‌ or⁣ it ​could distance itself from BLM and reaffirm its commitment to ⁣the values ​​it claims to uphold.

It seems that Coca-Cola has chosen⁢ the ⁤latter‍ option. By⁢ quietly removing any ⁣mention of its donation ‍to BLM from its website, the company is sending a message that it no longer wants to​ be associated with a ‍group that supports terrorism.

Some⁤ might argue that Coca-Cola’s decision ‌is⁣ purely a marketing strategy. They ⁢may claim ⁤that Coca-Cola ​is simply trying to protect its brand image and avoid controversy. While it ​is true ⁣that companies often​ make ⁣decisions based on their bottom line, it is ​also ⁢important to recognize that corporations have a responsibility to act ethically.

By distancing itself from BLM, Coca-Cola is​ taking a‌ stand against violence ⁣and⁤ terrorism. It is affirming its commitment to the principles of ‌peace, equality,⁣ and social justice. This is not a decision to be taken lightly.

It is worth noting that not all BLM chapters support terrorism. ⁤There are many peaceful activists within the movement ​who are ‌fighting for equality and ⁤justice. However, the fact that ⁣some chapters have openly endorsed violence is deeply concerning and⁤ cannot be ignored.

As⁣ consumers, it is important⁣ for us to hold corporations accountable for​ their actions. If we believe ⁤that a company’s ⁤values ​​do ‌not align with our own, we have the ⁤power to make a difference by choosing ​to‌ support other brands that reflect our ⁤beliefs.

Coca-Cola’s decision‌ to distance itself ⁣from BLM ‍may have come as a ‍surprise⁤ to many, considering its long-standing support for the ⁤movement. However, it is a clear‌ indication that⁢ the company is committed to ‍upholding its values⁢ and will⁢ not ⁢tolerate any association with violence and terrorism.

Whether or not this change will have⁢ a significant impact ⁣on Coca-Cola’s reputation and sales remains​ to be ‌seen. However, what ⁣is important is that companies like Coca-Cola continue to evaluate their partnerships and take a stand against violence ⁢and injustice.