Washington Examiner

Airlines should assist families with seating, no need for Biden’s input

If you want⁣ to sit together with your ​children on a plane, common sense⁢ says you have two options:

Pay a premium for buying good seats⁤ next to one⁣ another, or grab the very worst rows, which will hopefully continue to​ be free at the time of purchase.

Some ⁢airlines in recent years have made that latter choice unavailable:

If you’re going⁢ to buy the cheapest tickets, you don’t get to choose where ⁣you sit at ⁤all, and so reserving the three or five worst seats together is not an option. That means that a ​budget-conscious family, which may not care ⁤where it sits as long as they all sit together, ends up paying a premium for seats ⁢or asking a fellow passenger to switch seats —​ which sometimes goes awry.

On social media,​ “family separation”​ on airlines has become a thing, and so President Joe Biden,⁢ in an ​election year, is intervening.

You ought to be able to fly with your child – ​and sit next to them – without paying an additional fee.

It’s⁣ time all airlines offered fee free family ​seating.

— President Biden (@POTUS) February ​5, 2024

On one hand, Biden is right⁣ that all airlines ought to accommodate families in this‍ regard. America has gone too far in the direction of individualism and is now family-unfriendly, which is why we ‌have ⁣record-low rates of marriage and ⁣birth rates.

Accommodating families by allowing them to pick cheap seats in a block⁢ (assuming there are pairs or whole rows of seats available) is not costly to airlines, nor does it inconvenience‍ other ⁤customers. An uncharitable interpretation is that airlines realized that families valued⁣ sitting​ together, and so ⁢they would deliberately split them up unless the families paid to be kept together.

Customers disliked⁣ this, and ​on most ⁣routes, ⁤customers‍ have choices. So airlines that didn’t want to alienate customers changed their policies.

United Airlines announced a‌ new “family seating policy”⁢ one year ago, ⁢making it easier for children under 12 to sit with their families. American⁤ Airlines followed a week ‌later with ​an even more comprehensive plan. As summarized by travel writer Gary Leff:

“They ask you to⁢ book everyone in the same reservation,‍ but still offer to have reservations noted if they are separate.

“You can choose seats together or skip seat selection⁤ if only paid options are available and you don’t want to ‍pay. Even ‍Basic Economy passengers without seat assignments will have seats​ assigned together if⁢ traveling as a family. (If ⁣there aren’t seats available for the entire party to sit together, they’ll ensure ‌at least one adult is next to children‌ under 15 on⁣ the ⁢reservation.)”

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE ⁤WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Southwest Airlines was already doing this — the company has a family seating period that basically allows families to grab a whole row in the back of the ‍plane.

If airlines are accommodating families of their own accord, it’s hard to argue that regulation is needed for the protection of ⁣consumers. ‍In this light, regulation looks like ⁣simple election-year‌ politics.

What challenges do airlines‍ face when implementing fee-free family seating to ensure families ‌can ⁣sit together on planes?

Ican families ‍should not have to pay extra just​ to ensure they can sit together on a plane. It‌ is a basic expectation for parents‍ to be able to sit ​next to their children, especially on long‌ flights ‍where keeping an eye‌ on their well-being is crucial.

However, on the ‍other hand, airlines do operate as businesses, and they have the right to implement⁢ seating policies ⁣that maximize their ⁤profits. By charging extra for preferred seating or offering⁤ free seating selection only for higher-priced tickets, airlines can generate additional revenue. This ⁤is especially important for ‌low-cost carriers that heavily rely on ancillary fees ​to stay competitive.

Nevertheless, ⁣the⁣ issue of family separation ⁢on planes has gained significant ​attention on social media in recent years. Many frustrated‌ parents ⁣have taken ⁢to platforms ⁤like ‌Twitter to express their ⁣discontent with having to pay extra fees just to sit ‌together with their children. President Biden, recognizing this growing concern,‍ has publicly stated that families ⁢should not have to bear this additional financial burden.

While⁣ Biden’s statement does not carry legal implications, it does put pressure on airlines to reconsider their practices. Airlines may see this as an opportunity​ to improve⁢ their customer satisfaction and ⁣differentiate themselves from their competitors. ⁣By voluntarily offering fee-free family seating, ⁤airlines can​ enhance their reputation ⁢as family-friendly‍ carriers and attract more​ customers, ⁣especially those who prioritize convenience and affordability.

Implementing ⁤fee-free family seating​ may⁢ pose challenges to airlines. They need to ensure that families are ⁣seated together without compromising other passengers’ comfort or safety. Airlines may need‍ to reevaluate ​their⁣ seat⁤ allocation strategies, considering factors⁤ such as passenger‌ age, group size, and flight⁤ duration. This could involve reserving specific⁣ rows or sections for families ⁣or ​developing advanced⁣ seat assignment algorithms to accommodate their needs.

Furthermore, airlines need to consider the potential financial ‌impact ‌of offering fee-free family seating. They could‌ explore‍ alternative revenue streams or ⁣adjust​ their ⁢pricing models accordingly​ to compensate for the potential loss in ancillary fee⁤ income.‍ This ‌might involve ​revisiting the‍ pricing strategy for other ⁣premium services or introducing new optional services ‍that can generate additional revenue‍ without burdening families.

In conclusion, the issue of family separation on planes is a ⁢matter that deserves attention ⁤and consideration from both airlines and authorities. While airlines have the right to implement seating ⁣policies that maximize their profitability,⁤ they should also take into account‍ the expectations and needs of their customers. Fee-free family ⁤seating can serve as a win-win solution, ‌benefiting both families and airlines. By offering⁢ this⁢ option,⁣ airlines ‌can⁤ enhance their reputation, attract more ⁣customers,⁤ and potentially generate additional revenue channels. Ultimately, it​ is in everyone’s best ⁤interest to ‍find a reasonable ⁢and fair solution to⁢ the issue of‍ family seating​ on planes.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker