oann

Alabama Gov. signs law shielding IVF providers from legal liability


The votes for SB159 bill (IVF‌ Fertility Bill) are displayed in the House Chambers,⁢ Wednesday, March ⁤6, 2024, in Montgomery, Ala. (AP Photo/ Butch Dill)

OAN’s Abril Elfi
12:20 PM ​– Thursday, March 7, 2024

Alabama’s governor has signed legislation ⁢into law that is meant to protect IVF ‌doctors from legal liability or repercussions.

Advertisement

On Wednesday, Governor Kay Ivey (R-Ala.) signed a bill‌ that will protect doctors from‍ legal liability in reference to an Alabama court ruling that had ruled frozen embryos were equivalent to children.

“I​ am pleased to sign this important, short-term measure into law so that couples in Alabama hoping and praying to be parents can grow their families through IVF,” Ivey ⁤said.

Last month, the Alabama Supreme Court decided‌ that three couples could file‍ wrongful death claims on⁢ behalf of their “extrauterine children.” The couples were referring to their frozen embryos that had⁢ been destroyed, or killed⁤ as some would say, in a faulty ⁣storage facility incident.

Concerns ‍regarding⁤ clinic‍ civil liabilities were raised by the ruling that treated an embryo the same as a child or gestating‍ fetus⁢ under the wrongful death statute. Soon after, three large ‍IVF clinics​ in the state halted⁣ their operations.

With immediate ⁤effect, the new law protects providers from criminal​ prosecution and​ civil lawsuits alleging that⁤ they had caused “damage ‌to or death of an embryo” during IVF procedures.

Manufacturers of IVF-related products, such as the nutrient-rich solutions used to grow embryos, can still be‍ sued in civil court, but the amount of damages awarded ​would be limited ​to ‍“the price paid ‍for the impacted in vitro ​cycle.”

Doctors from one ⁤of the ⁣facilities that paused⁤ IVF services said that the bill will now allow them to resume embryo transfers.

“We have ‍some transfers tomorrow‌ and some ‍Friday. This means that we will be able to do embryo transfers and hopefully‍ have more pregnancies and⁢ babies in ‍the state of Alabama,” Dr. Mamie McLean said ⁢after the‌ vote.

Stay informed! Receive ​breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts

Share this post!

with Kimberly Fletcher

with Karoline Leavitt

with Bill Wells

with⁤ Rep. Tim Burchett

Investors have piled into Nvidia-focused⁤ ETFs this year on the frenzy around AI.

LinkedIn for the first time​ disclosed‌ sales for its premium subscription⁣ business as the company sees an ‍uptick in adoption of new AI tools.

Over the past several years, social media companies have ‌developed the practice of curbing the free speech of users who don’t fall in line with Silicon Valley’s narratives.

Apple has⁣ terminated Epic Games’ developer⁢ account, ‌the Fortnite video game maker said on Wednesday.

rnrn

‌ How⁢ does the ‍signing of this bill raise⁤ questions about the legal status of embryos and the ethical implications of IVF​ procedures

D. The bill also ‌requires doctors to inform patients about the⁣ potential risks and limitations of IVF procedures.

The signing of this bill is seen as a victory for IVF doctors and couples struggling with fertility issues in Alabama. It provides protection and reassurance to doctors who are‍ working to help individuals and couples realize their dreams of starting a family.

However, not everyone is in favor⁣ of this legislation. Some Democrats feel that it falls short in protecting reproductive rights. They argue that the bill does not ​address the broader issue of access to reproductive healthcare and that it may limit‍ options for individuals and couples who are ⁣unable to conceive naturally.

The controversy surrounding the treatment of embryos as children or fetuses‍ under the wrongful death statute ​highlights the complex and sensitive nature‌ of ‌reproductive‌ healthcare. Balancing the rights and⁢ interests of couples seeking fertility treatment, doctors providing the treatment, and the embryos themselves is a challenging task.

Supporters of the bill argue⁢ that ⁤it​ strikes a necessary ‌balance‌ by protecting doctors from undue legal liability while still holding manufacturers of IVF-related products accountable. They believe that it will ⁢encourage the resumption of IVF ⁤procedures in the state, allowing couples to pursue their dreams of parenthood.

The signing of this⁣ bill‌ in Alabama also raises questions about the​ legal status of embryos‍ and the ethical implications‍ of IVF procedures. It opens up discussions about the‍ rights​ of embryos and the responsibilities of doctors and clinics in their care.

The passage of this legislation in Alabama could potentially influence similar debates and discussions in other states. It sets ‍a precedent for⁢ how ‍IVF procedures are regulated and how doctors are protected from legal liability.

In conclusion, the signing of the legislation in Alabama to protect IVF doctors from legal ⁣liability is a significant development in the field of reproductive healthcare. It ‌provides much-needed reassurance to doctors and couples ⁤struggling with fertility issues, but it ⁣also raises important questions about the ethical and legal status of embryos. The ‌bill has its supporters ​and critics, highlighting ⁢the ongoing debates and discussions surrounding reproductive rights and access to healthcare.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker