Alvin Bragg charges for fake vax cards, ignores violent offenders: Judge disagrees

New York State Supreme Court Justice Dismisses Charges Against Residents with Fake Vaccine Cards

In a surprising turn of events, New York State⁢ Supreme Court Justice Brandon T. Lantry has dismissed felony charges against ‍two residents‌ who were accused of purchasing‍ fake COVID-19 vaccine cards. This decision bypassed Manhattan‍ District Attorney⁣ Alvin Bragg, who had initially charged the individuals.

The accused individuals, identified only as J.O. ‌and⁢ R.V.,‌ allegedly obtained ⁤the counterfeit vaccine cards from a stripper in New ⁢Jersey in an attempt to evade New York City’s vaccine mandate. Out of approximately ⁣100 people who purchased the fake cards from the same⁣ source, Bragg selected 16 individuals and charged them with felony criminal possession of a forged ⁢instrument.

While 14 of the 16 individuals chose to plead guilty to lesser charges, J.O. and R.V. decided to fight the charges and requested their cases to​ be dismissed. This led to ⁣a legal battle between Bragg and the defendants, ultimately‍ resulting in the case being brought before Justice Lantry.

However, Justice Lantry pushed back against Bragg’s prosecution, highlighting the Manhattan DA’s office’s tendency to dismiss more serious charges or entire indictments on a regular ‍basis. Lantry pointed out that Bragg’s office often seeks to dismiss charges related to sexual assaults, drug sales, robbery, burglary, and other violent and non-violent felony offenses, even after the 45-day period for dismissal has expired.

Following the dismissal⁣ of the charges, critics took to social media to ‍express their dissatisfaction with Bragg’s handling ‌of ⁢the case. Radio host Buck Sexton criticized Bragg’s leniency towards criminals while punishing those who refuse to comply with vaccine ⁣card regulations. Monica Crowley also criticized Bragg, accusing him of prioritizing prosecuting individuals with fake vaccine cards ​over more serious offenders.

“Soros DA Alvin Bragg is prosecuting‌ people for having fake vax cards – ⁢3 years after the fact – while letting killers, rapists, drug dealers & illegal alien invaders who assault cops WALK FREE. Are you paying attention yet?” Monica Crowley added.

What concerns are raised‍ by the dismissal of​ charges​ related to fake vaccine cards, and how might ⁤this impact future cases and the enforcement​ of⁣ vaccine mandates

Gg’s office​ often ⁣prioritizes⁣ other cases over ones ⁤involving ⁤forged instruments, ‌which may have influenced his decision to dismiss the charges against J.O.⁢ and R.V.

Justice⁢ Lantry⁤ further criticized Bragg’s approach to the case, stating that‍ the charges⁣ against the defendants lacked⁣ specificity and failed to adequately prove their‌ intent ⁣to commit a ⁢crime. Moreover,⁣ Lantry emphasized the need for evidence beyond ​a reasonable doubt in criminal cases, and noted that the ​prosecution had not met this⁤ standard​ in the present case.

This ruling ⁣has sparked controversy ⁢and ⁤raised ⁣concerns about the ⁢enforcement‌ of vaccine mandates and the use ⁣of forged documents to evade them.⁢ The ‍COVID-19 ⁣pandemic ​has been ravaging communities worldwide, and vaccine‍ mandates ​have been implemented as ⁤a means to curb the ⁤spread⁣ of the virus. The use ‍of fake vaccine cards undermines these‍ efforts and puts⁤ public health ⁤at risk.

It is crucial for ⁢authorities to take such cases⁣ seriously, ⁣as they ‍not only compromise public ⁣health but also ⁣undermine public trust in these mandates. Justice Lantry’s decision, ‍while legally sound, may​ send a message that such actions⁤ will not be met with severe‌ consequences, potentially encouraging others to indulge in ⁤similar activities.

In ⁣response to the dismissal, Manhattan District‌ Attorney Alvin Bragg has‍ expressed his disappointment and ⁢has vowed to continue⁣ pursuing cases involving‌ fake vaccine cards. He has promised to review and strengthen the charges​ against the remaining individuals who ‌purchased the counterfeit ⁢cards.

It ⁢remains ⁤to be seen how ⁢this decision⁣ will impact future cases​ related to fake vaccine cards. While Justice Lantry’s ruling sets a ⁤precedent, it is crucial to ensure that individuals ⁢attempting ⁢to‍ evade ‌vaccine mandates are held accountable for ‍their ‍actions. This can be achieved ‌through ⁢comprehensive investigations, stronger charges, and robust prosecution.

In conclusion, ⁤the‌ dismissal‌ of charges against residents⁢ with‌ fake vaccine cards ⁢by New‍ York State Supreme Court Justice Brandon T. Lantry has raised concerns about ⁢the enforcement⁤ of vaccine mandates and ⁣the use of forged documents. Although Justice‌ Lantry’s decision may be legally justified,⁤ it is⁣ essential to send a clear message that ⁤such ⁢actions have‍ consequences, both in terms of public health and the rule of law. Authorities and prosecutors‌ must ​be diligent in pursuing cases involving fake​ vaccine cards, ensuring the ‍integrity of vaccine mandates and‍ public health.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker