Amendment to Cut ‘Pothole Pete’ Buttigieg’s Salary to $1 Passes the House

Amendment to⁤ Cut ‘Pothole Pete’ Buttigieg’s Salary to $1 Passes the House

An amendment to dramatically reduce Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg’s salary to just $1 was successfully passed by the⁤ House ⁢on Tuesday.

The amendment, known as the‍ Holman rule, was added to the 2024 Transportation and Housing and Urban Development spending bill through a voice vote, as reported by ⁣ The⁤ Hill.

While the full bill has yet to be approved, the inclusion of this amendment would require the Democrat-controlled Senate’s‍ approval.

Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia introduced⁢ the amendment⁣ and‍ explained her ⁣reasons in a video posted on​ Twitter. However, she mistakenly claimed that the amendment would result in Buttigieg’s termination.

In her ⁤floor remarks, Greene criticized Buttigieg for‌ his ‍alleged ⁢failure to ‌prioritize the needs of the American people as ⁤Secretary of Transportation. She accused him of⁤ focusing on ⁢issues such as labeling roads as racist and implementing ‍climate change initiatives⁤ instead of strengthening the nation’s transportation and infrastructure systems.

BREAKING: I’m ⁤proud to announce my amendment to FIRE ​Pete Buttigieg just PASSED⁢ the House.

Pothole Pete‌ staged fake ⁣bike ⁤rides to the White House‍ and ⁤used private planes funded by taxpayers to ‌receive awards for ⁤the way certain people have sex.

American taxpayers should not… pic.twitter.com/9fq9XrXLV2

— Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (@RepMTG)⁢ November 7, ⁤2023

Greene also criticized Buttigieg for unloading a bicycle from an⁣ SUV before riding it, suggesting that​ he⁣ had deceived the public by pretending to bike to​ work.‌ The Department of Transportation and‍ Buttigieg himself denied any deception, stating that he occasionally did‍ bike to work.

Furthermore, Greene highlighted Buttigieg’s tenure ⁤as a mayor, referring to him as ‍”Pothole Pete” due to his alleged failure to address road ​maintenance issues in the town he served.

Caitlin Sutherland, Executive Director of Americans for​ Public Trust, accused ⁤Buttigieg⁢ of⁤ abusing his position and lacking transparency regarding the costs of his‍ taxpayer-funded private jet trips.

The future of⁣ The Western Journal, the source of this article, is currently at risk due to the efforts ⁣of Silicon Valley and Big⁤ Tech. The Western Journal aims to provide accurate information and counter false narratives that ​make Americans feel‍ powerless. Donations are crucial to support their mission.

A Note from ⁤Our Founder:

Every morning, we at The Western Journal wake up with a mission to provide you with ⁤important information ​about ‍what’s happening in America.

We can’t do​ that without your help.

False narratives have been ‍used ​to make‍ you‍ feel ⁣powerless, but ‍The Western Journal empowers you​ by⁤ exposing these falsehoods.

The future of The ⁢Western Journal is in jeopardy, and your support is urgently‍ needed.

Silicon Valley and Big⁢ Tech have ⁣tried to shut ‌down The Western ‌Journal, but it has been kept alive by faithful donors and​ subscribers.

If you’ve never ‍donated⁣ before, please consider ⁣doing so today. The situation⁣ in America is dire,​ and The Western Journal stands⁤ for truth‍ in these challenging times.

Please stand with us by donating today.

Floyd G.⁤ Brown
Founder of The Western⁣ Journal

The post Amendment to Cut ‘Pothole⁤ Pete’‍ Buttigieg’s Salary ‌to $1 Passes the House appeared first on The​ Western Journal.

How did ​critics of Buttigieg’s performance as Secretary of Transportation argue that his focus ⁤on social issues and climate change was a misallocation of resources?

E” due to his alleged ⁣lack of success in fixing the city’s pothole problem. She argued that‌ if Buttigieg couldn’t handle a simple task like ⁣fixing potholes ‍as a mayor, then he was unfit‌ to be the Secretary of Transportation, a role⁣ that requires effective management of transportation infrastructure⁢ on a national scale.

The amendment received support ‌from several ⁤Republican representatives ​who agreed with ‌Greene’s criticisms of Buttigieg. They argued⁢ that ​his focus ​on ‍social issues and climate change instead of improving the country’s transportation ⁢systems was​ a misallocation of resources and⁢ a failure to address the pressing needs of the American people.

However, not all⁤ members ⁤of the House were in‍ favor of the amendment. Democratic representatives defended Buttigieg, praising his efforts to address climate change and improve transportation infrastructure. They⁤ argued that his salary should reflect his responsibilities and the ⁤complexity of‌ the job, rather than being reduced to ⁢just $1.

While the passage of the amendment ⁣in the House is a symbolic victory for its supporters, its ultimate fate depends on the approval of the Senate. With Democrats holding a⁤ majority in the Senate, it is unlikely that the⁢ amendment will be passed. Even if​ it were to pass, it would face⁣ opposition from President Joe Biden, who‍ appointed Buttigieg to the position and has expressed confidence in his abilities.

Overall, the amendment to cut Pete Buttigieg’s salary‌ to $1 demonstrates the political divide and differing⁢ opinions on his performance as⁤ Secretary of Transportation. It reflects the ​ongoing ‌debates surrounding transportation policy, climate change, ​and the role ​of government officials. While some believe⁣ that Buttigieg’s salary‍ should ‍be reduced due ‍to alleged failures and misalignments of ‍priorities, others⁣ argue that his work ‍in addressing climate change⁣ and improving transportation infrastructure deserves appropriate recognition and compensation. The future of the⁤ amendment and Buttigieg’s salary will be ​determined in the coming months as the Transportation‍ and Housing and Urban Development spending bill makes⁢ its way through ⁢the Senate and towards ‍President⁢ Biden’s desk.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases