AP’s attempt to use Liz Cheney against Jim Jordan’s Speaker bid fails.
AP Tries to Use Liz Cheney to Thwart Jim Jordan’s Speaker Bid, But It Backfires
Jim Jordan couldn’t have bought an ad that was better.
The Ohio Republican mounting a bid to become the next speaker of the House was the topic of an Associated Press piece on Monday that apparently aimed to scare GOP members with the prospect of a “political brawler” taking the helm.
But using Rep. Liz Cheney to do it was a bad, bad move.
The article was plugged by an AP post published on social media that looked at Jordan from a clearly leftist viewpoint:
Rep. Jim Jordan becoming House speaker would help cement the far right’s takeover of the Republican Party and trigger conflict with Democrats over the size and scope of government. https://t.co/dlRmJLFil5
— The Associated Press (@AP) October 16, 2023
“Rep. Jim Jordan becoming House speaker would help cement the far right’s takeover of the Republican Party and trigger conflict with Democrats over the size and scope of government,” the news service’s post on X stated.
Well, since “conflict with Democrats over the size and scope of government” is more or less the purpose of the Republican Party, it’s tough to see why that might be a problem.
And while scare words like “far right takeover” might be code words in the establishment media to smear GOP members who actually have a spine, they’ve been used for so long they’ve lost whatever sting they might have had. (“Far right” to the establishment media seems to be anyone more conservative than John Kasich.)
But the real tell was in the AP article itself, which sold itself with the sentence “Some members of Congress — including some in his own party — label Jordan an extremist unworthy of the speakership, pointing to his active role in Trump’s bid to stop the certification of the 2020 presidential election, as well as his refusal to honor a congressional subpoena about the Jan. 6 attack at the Capitol.”
Well, that might be appropriately terrifying if the reporters had managed to quote a source in Jordan’s party in Congress that actually said those things. Instead, it turned to two Republicans who are no longer in the House — former Reps. John Boehner of Ohio and Liz Cheney of Wyoming.
To its credit, the article notes that Boehner was a political opponent of Jordan going back to Jordan’s days in the Ohio state legislature. It also notes that Jordan was one of the key conservatives who helped bounce Boehner out of the speaker’s job back in 2015.
It also uses a quote from a Boehner interview with CBS in 2021 where Boehner said, “I just never saw a guy who spent more time tearing things apart — never building anything, never putting anything together.”
Actually, Jordan helped put together the House Freedom Caucus, a group of conservative lawmakers that has been one of the brightest of the few bright spots in the government for the American right.
It’s where the article cites Liz Cheney, thought, that it really shows its hand. It quotes a recent speech Cheney delivered where she said:
“If the Republicans decide that Jim Jordan should be the speaker of the House, there would no longer be any possible way to argue that a group of elected Republicans could be counted on to defend the Constitution.”
This would be nonsense coming from any source, but from Liz Cheney, it’s outright laughable. This is the Liz Cheney who sat on Nancy Pelosi’s handpicked committee to investigate the Capitol incursion of Jan. 6 and came to the utterly foregone conclusion that it was all former President Donald Trump’s fault.
It’s also the Liz Cheney who was routed in the Republican primary in Wyoming last year by a humiliating spread of 37 points.
For the AP to pretend that she is speaking as somehow as a member of Jordan’s own party, just because she calls herself a Republican, is beyond misleading.
But it basically backfired.
As the social media watchdog site Twitchy noted, “Oh sure, they think they’re WARNING people about how horrific it would be to have an actual conservative as Speaker of the House but really all they did with this was remind people on the Right WHY Jordan should take the spot.”
Check out some responses to the AP post here:
In other words, it’s the first step Make America Great Again
— Vince Langman (@LangmanVince) October 16, 2023
I wouldn’t call that ‘far right’.
— Jonny Nomadic (@JonnyNomadic) October 16, 2023
I don’t think you understand what being fiscally conservative means…. pic.twitter.com/7o2evUIORa
— Pam D (@soirchick) October 16, 2023
Thank you for endorsing Jim Jordan as speaker!
— Eric Hellwig (@Coach_Hellwig) October 16, 2023
It’s important to note that these aren’t cherry-picked responses.
Sure there are a few anti-Jordan posts in there, but the vast, vast majority saw the AP post for what it was — a backhanded smear of a man who could well be elected speaker of the House on Tuesday.
It’s far from certain that Jordan has the votes among the Republican conference, and he needs virtually all of them, given the sliver of a majority Republicans have in the chamber.
But the point is, Jordan has been one of the most consistently conservative members of the House since he entered Congress in 2007 after defeating an incumbent Democrat by a margin of 60 percent to 40 percent.
The AP also goes to some lengths to dwell on a sexual abuse scandal at Ohio State University when Jordan served as an assistant wrestling coach in the 1980s and 1990s. The abuse involved a team doctor who died in 2005, as NBC reported last week, when it looked like Jordan’s chances at the speakership were dead.
Much as liberals like to rehash long-ago sex scandals when they don’t involve Democrats, that isn’t likely to affect Jordan’s prospects.
The article also highlights Jordan’s role defending Trump during the Russia “collusion” hoax that bedeviled his presidency, nothing that Jordan ” used his platform on the House Judiciary Committee to rail against the probe as politically motivated and to attack the law enforcement officials who supervised it.”
Given what we know now about the Russia “collusion” hoax and the political motivations at its heart, there are few finer things a news outlet could say about a Republican lawmaker.
It also spends some time on Jordan’s activities in the fallout of the 2020 presidential election, which Jordan supported former President Donald Trump.
Trump awarded Jordan the Presidential Medal of Freedom before he left office.
There’s no way of knowing as of Monday afternoon if Jordan will win the support of all the House Republicans. As Fox reported Friday, he won the nomination by a far-from-unanimous 124-81 vote against Rep. Austin Scott of Georgia.
But one thing is rock-solid true:
Citing Liz Cheney’s criticisms as a reason to vote against Jordan for speaker is the best thing the AP could have done to convince Republicans to support him.
If Jim Jordan had been trying to buy an ad from AP, he couldn’t have gotten a better one.
A Note from Our Founder:
Every morning, we at The Western Journal wake up and pursue our mission of giving you the important information you need about what’s happening in America.
We can’t do that without your help.
America has been on the receiving end of false narratives. The purpose of these false narratives is to make you feel powerless. The Western Journal empowers you by breaking these false narratives.
But I wouldn’t be honest with you today if I didn’t let you know that the future of The Western Journal is in jeopardy without your help.
Silicon Valley and the Big Tech tyrants have done everything they can to put The Western Journal out of business. Our faithful donors and subscribers have kept us going.
If you’ve never chosen to donate, let me be honest: We need your help today.
Please don’t wait one minute. Donate right now – our situation in America is dire. Our country hangs by a thread, and The Western Journal stands for truth in this difficult time.
Please stand with us by donating today.
Floyd G. Brown
Founder of The Western Journal
How does the media’s biased reporting contribute to the division and erosion of trust in our society
Attack, a committee that was clearly biased and driven by a political agenda. This is the Liz Cheney who voted to impeach former President Donald Trump, an action that was widely criticized and seen as a betrayal by many Republicans. And this is the Liz Cheney who is more interested in virtue signaling to the liberal media than in defending the principles and values of the Republican Party.
Using Liz Cheney to try and discredit Jim Jordan only serves to undermine the credibility of the Associated Press. It shows that they are willing to rely on biased sources to push their own agenda, rather than providing unbiased and objective reporting.
Jim Jordan is a strong conservative voice in Congress, and he has consistently fought to uphold the values of limited government, individual liberty, and fiscal responsibility. He has been a staunch defender of President Trump and has been at the forefront of efforts to expose the corruption and bias within the FBI and Department of Justice. He is exactly the kind of leader that the Republican Party needs in these challenging times.
But rather than engaging in a substantive debate about the merits of Jordan’s bid for speaker, the Associated Press and other media outlets prefer to resort to personal attacks and character assassination. They try to paint Jordan as an extremist and a troublemaker, instead of recognizing his dedication to his constituents and his unwavering commitment to conservative principles.
This kind of dishonest and biased reporting only serves to further divide our nation and erode trust in the media. It is a disservice to the American people, who deserve factual and unbiased information in order to make informed decisions.
In conclusion, the Associated Press’s attempt to use Liz Cheney to thwart Jim Jordan’s bid for speaker of the House has backfired. It only exposes the bias and agenda-driven reporting of the media, and it does nothing to undermine Jordan’s qualifications and commitment to conservative principles. Instead of resorting to personal attacks, it is time for the media to focus on substantive issues and engage in honest and objective reporting.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
